1
ϩ
13
1
The following dimer relative abundance was shown by H
NMR spectroscopy performed on crude reduction mixture:
m/z 534.8 (M ϩ Na) ; C NMR (see Table 1), H NMR (see
Table 3).
7
a (I) 6%; 5a (II) 53%; 8a (III) 5%; 6a (IV) 36%.
The second fraction yielded 1,1Ј-dibenzyl-1,1Ј,2,4Ј-tetra-
hydro[2,4Ј]bipyridinyl-3,3Ј,5,5Ј-tetracarboxamide 6b (250 mg,
25% yield with respect to the salt 3b); mp 182 184 ЊC; UV
(MeOH) λmax 295 (ε 14 300) and 388 nm (ε 5250); MS (ESI)
m/z 534.8 (M ϩ Na) ; C NMR (see Table 2), H NMR (see
Table 4).
Preparative HPLC (eluent 3 MeOH 55%–0.07
M aq.
Ϫ1
NH HCO 45%; flow rate 8 cm min ) of the crude residue
4
3
(
950 mg) gave three fractions. Each fraction was evaporated
ϩ
13
1
under vacuum to eliminate the methanol, the aqueous solution
was repeatedly extracted with dichloromethane, and, lastly, the
organic solvent was removed.
The first fraction afforded 1,1Ј-dibenzyl-1,1Ј,2,2Ј-tetrahydro-
N,NЈ,NЉ,NЈ-tetramethyl[2,2Ј]bipyridinyl-3,3Ј,5,5Ј-tetracarbox-
Photocatalysed rearrangement of 2,2Ј-and 2,4Ј-linked dimers to
4,4Ј-linked dimers
amide 7a; mp 164–166 ЊC; UV(MeOH) λ
MS (ESI) m/z 591.2 (M ϩ Na) ; C NMR (see Table 1), H
286 and 409 nm;
max
ϩ
13
1
Samples of the crude mixtures from the reduction of 3a and 3b
were dissolved in CH Cl and exposed to irradiation, at 254 nm,
2
2
NMR (see Table 3).
in vacuum-sealed vials. At appropriate time intervals the com-
position of the solutions was monitored by analytical HPLC:
the chromatograms showed the rapid disappearance of the 2,2Ј-
linked dimers, the gradual decrease of the 2,4Ј-linked dimers,
and the corresponding increase of the 4,4Ј-linked dimers (Figs.
2a, b; 4a, b). Dimers 7a,b and 8a,b totally disappeared in 10–15
min whereas the complete transformation of dimers 6a,b into
1
,1Ј-Dibenzyl-1,1Ј,4,4Ј-tetrahydro-N,NЈ,NЉ,NЈ-tetramethyl-
4,4Ј]bipyridinyl-3,3Ј,5,5Ј-tetracarboxamide 5a (400 mg, 40%
yield with respect to the salt 3a) was obtained from the second
[
fraction; mp (from AcOEt) 189–191 ЊC; UV(MeOH) λ
261
C
max
ϩ
13
sh and 362 (ε 6990) nm; MS (ESI) m/z 591.2 (M ϩ Na) ;
1
NMR (see Table 1), H NMR (see Table 3).
The third fraction yielded 1,1Ј-dibenzyl-1,1Ј,2,4Ј-tetrahydro-
N,NЈ,NЉ,NЈ-tetramethyl[2,4Ј]bipyridinyl-3,3Ј,5,5Ј-tetracarbox-
amide 6a (270 mg, 27% yield with respect to the salt 3a); mp
5
a,b was observed after 160–180 min.
(
from AcOEt) 176 178 ЊC; UV (MeOH) λmax 295 nm (ε 14 600)
ϩ 13
Acknowledgements
and 390 (ε 5336); MS (ESI) m/z 591.2 (M ϩ Na) ; C NMR
1
(
see Table 2), H NMR (see Table 4).
This work was supported by 60% funding from MURST
(
Italy).
Electrochemical reduction of salt 3b
-Benzyl-3,5-dicarbamoylpyridinium bromide 3b (1.3 g) was
1
3
References
added to 300 cm of pH 7 0.1 M NaH PO buffer, and the
2
4
solution was electrolysed, in the dark, at Ϫ1.0V vs SCE under
the above reported conditions. At the end of the electrolysis the
solution was lyophilized, in a dark-glass flask, to a dry residue,
which was extracted with MeOH. Removal of the solvent
yielded a crude product (900 mg), which was analysed by HPLC
using the following solvent system: MeOH 55%–0.01 M
1 (a) P. J. Elving, in Topics in Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics,
ed. G. Milazzo, Wiley, New York, 1976, vol. 1, 179; (b) H. Jaegfeldt,
Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 1981, 8, 355; (c) Y. Ohnishi and M. Kitani,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1979, 52, 2674; (d ) J. Kovar and H. Klukanova,
Biochim. Biophy. Acta, 1984, 788, 98.
(a) V. Carelli, F. Liberatore, A. Casini, R. Mondelli, A. Arnone,
I. Carelli, G. Rotilio and I. Mavelli, Bioorg. Chem., 1980, 9, 342; (b)
E. Ragg, L. Scaglioni, R. Mondelli, V. Carelli, I. Carelli, A. Casini,
A. Finazzi-Agro’, F. Liberatore and S. Tortorella, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 1991, 1076, 37; (c) F. Micheletti Moracci, F. Liberatore, V.
Carelli, A. Arnone, I. Carelli and M. E. Cardinali, J. Org. Chem.,
2
3
Ϫ1
aq. NH HCO 45%; flow rate 1 cm min . The eluate was
4
3
monitored at 275 and 380 nm.
The elution profile showed four peaks: I (t 6.5 min, λ 288
R
max
and 402 nm), II (tR 9.2 min, λmax 262 and 369 nm), III (tR
1
978, 43, 3420.
1
0.3 min, λmax 288 and 402 nm) and IV (t 11.5 min, λ 295
R max
3
4
5
(a) V. Carelli, F. Liberatore, A. Casini, B. Di Rienzo, S. Tortorella and
L. Scipione, New J. Chem., 1996, 20, 125; (b) V. Carelli, F. Liberatore,
A. Casini, S. Tortorella, L. Scipione and B. Di Rienzo, New. J. Chem.,
1998, 22, 999.
and 388 nm) (Fig. 3a, b).
The following dimer relative abundance was shown by H
NMR spectroscopy performed on the crude reduction mixture:
1
(a) O. Mumm and W. Beth, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1921, 54, 1591;
7
b (I) 4.5%; 5b (II) 49%; 8b (III) 6.5%; 6b (IV) 40%.
(
(
b) O. Mumm and H. Ludwig, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1926, 59, 1605;
c) O. Mumm and J. Diederichsen, Justus. Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1939,
Preparative HPLC (eluent MeOH 45%–0.07 M aq. NH -
4
3
Ϫ1
HCO 55%; flow 7 cm min ) of the crude residue (900 mg)
3
5
38, 195.
gave two fractions. Each fraction was evaporated under vacuum
to eliminate the methanol, the aqueous solution was repeatedly
extracted with dichloromethane, and the organic solvent
removed to dryness.
F. T. McNamara, J. W. Nieft, J. F. Ambrose and E. S. Huyser, J. Org.
Chem., 1977, 42, 988.
6 J. C. Leprêtre, D. Limosin, G. Pierre, P. Chautemps and J. L. Pierre,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 2237.
7
K. Wallenfels and H. Schuly, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1959, 621,
1
,1Ј-Dibenzyl-1,1Ј,4,4Ј-tetrahydro-[4,4Ј]bipyridinyl-3,3Ј,5,5Ј-
tetracarboxamide 5b (350 mg, 35% yield with respect to the salt
b) was obtained from the first fraction, mp 194–196 ЊC; UV
MeOH) λmax 262 (ε 13 950) and 369 nm (ε 7150); MS (ESI)
1
06.
8
L. Avigliano, V. Carelli, A. Casini, A. Finazzi-Agro’ and F.
Liberatore, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1983, 723, 372.
3
(
9 H. Meyer and H. Tropsch, Monatsch. Chem., 1914, 35, 781.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 542–547
547