Journal of the American Chemical Society
ARTICLE
3) A comparison of k = 1 ꢁ 10 and k = 5.4 ꢁ 10 s-1
-
11
-9
(4) Richard, J. P.; Amyes, T. L. Bioorg. Chem. 2004, 32, 354–366.
(5) John, R. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1248, 81–96.
(
o
o
for catalysis by 0.01 M benzaldehyde and salicylaldehyde,
respectively, shows that the ortho-phenoxy substituent
stabilizes the transition state for deprotonation of glycine
by 3.8 kcal/mol (Chart 6). This is due to the stabilizing
intramolecular hydrogen bond between the ring oxygen
(6) Jansonius, J. N. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998, 8, 759–769.
(7) Christen, P.; Mehta, P. K. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 436–447.
(8) Eliot, A. C.; Kirsch, J. F. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73, 383–415.
(9) Toney, M. D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 433, 279–287.
(10) Sun, S.; Toney, M. D. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 4058–65.
(11) Watanabe, A.; Yoshimura, T.; Mikami, B.; Hayashi, H.;
3
6
anion and the iminum ion. The strong intramolecular
hydrogenbondcausesthe carbonacidpK to increase from
3 for 2-IMH to 25 for 3-IMH. This decrease in carbon
a
Kagamiyama, H.; Esak, N. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 19166–19172.
12) Major, D. T.; Gao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16345–16357.
2
(
acidity attenuates the transition-state stabilization from
hydrogen bonding, by causing a decrease in the reactivity
of 3-IMH toward deprotonation by hydroxide ion.
(13) Zhou, X.; Toney, M. D. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 311–320.
(14) Zhou, X.; Jin, X.; Medhekar, R.; Chen, X.; Dieckmann, T.;
Toney, M. D. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1367–1377.
(15) Jackson, L. K.; Brooks, H. B.; Osterman, A. L.; Goldsmith, E. J.;
(
4) The substitution of the strongly electron-withdrawing
Phillips, M. A. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 11247–11257.
(16) Jackson, L. K.; Brooks, H. B.; Myers, D. P.; Phillips, M. A.
Biochemistry 2003, 42, 2933–2940.
pyridinium cation for the phenyl ring at 3-IMH causes
-
9
-6 -1
k to increase from 5.4 ꢁ 10 to ∼4.6 ꢁ 10
s .
o
Neglecting the small effect of the o-methyl group on the
(17) Fogle, E. J.; Liu, W.; Woon, S.-T.; Keller, J. W.; Toney, M. D.
reactivity of DPL-IMH , there is an additional 4 kcal/
2
Biochemistry 2005, 44, 16392–16404.
mol stabilization of the transition state for deprotonation
of glycine (Chart 6). This reflects the strong electron
demand of the pyridinium cation, which drives the
stabilizing delocalization of charge across the extended
π-system.
(
(
18) Lin, Y.-L.; Gao, J. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 84–94.
19) Kirsch, J. F.; Eichele, G.; Ford, G. C.; Vincent, M. G.; Jansonius,
J. N.; Gehring, H.; Christen, P. J. Mol. Biol. 1984, 174, 497–525.
(20) Hayashi, H.; Kagamiyama, H. Biochemistry 1997, 36,
13558–13569.
(21) Hayashi, H.; Mizuguchi, H.; Miyahara, I.; Islam, M. M.; Ikush-
In conclusion, these results provide an impressive example of
how the summation of several relatively small effects in the
assembly of the complex molecules PLP and DPL has produced
iro, H.; Nakajima, Y.; Hirotsu, K.; Kagamiyama, H. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2003, 1647, 103–109.
(
22) Liu, W.; Peterson, P. E.; Langston, J. A.; Jin, X.; Zhou, X.;
Fisher, A. J.; Toney, M. D. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 2982–2992.
23) Miles, E. W. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 140–151.
33
a type of catalyst of truly extraordinary power. It is an open
question whether modern chemists will be able to match the
brute-force success of the trial and error of evolution and succeed
in designing either small- or large-molecule catalysts with the
power of those observed in nature.
(
(24) Dunn, M. F.; Niks, D.; Ngo, H.; Barends, T. R. M.; Schlichting,
I. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33, 254–264.
(25) Schirch, V.; Szebenyi, D. M. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9,
4
82–487.
26) Paiardini, A.; Contestabile, R.; D’Aguanno, S.; Pascarella, S.;
Bossa, F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1647, 214–219.
27) Rios, A.; Crugeiras, J.; Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
(
’
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(
S
Supporting Information. Table S1 of first-order rate
b
Soc. 2001, 123, 7949–7950.
(28) Crugeiras, J.; Rios, A.; Riveiros, E.; Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2041–2050.
constants, k , for exchange for deuterium of the first R-proton
ex
of glycine in the presence of acetone and HFIP buffers; Table S2
of first-order rate constants, k , for exchange for deuterium of
(29) Toth, K.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3013–3021.
(30) Jencks, W. P. Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology, 2nd ed.;
Dover: New York, 1987.
ex
the first R-proton of glycine in the presence of benzaldehyde;
Table S3 of first-order rate constants, k , for exchange for
ex
(
31) Felten, A. E.; Zhu, G.; Aron, Z. D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
916–1919.
32) Denesyuk, A. I.; Denessiouk, K. A.; Korpela, T.; Johnson, M. S.
J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316, 155–172.
33) Richard, J. P.; Amyes, T. L.; Crugeiras, J.; Rios, A. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 1–9.
34) Morrow, J. R.; Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008,
deuterium of the first R-proton of glycine in the presence of
salicylaldehyde and HFIP buffers. This material is available free of
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
1
(
(
’
AUTHOR INFORMATION
(
Corresponding Author
anamaria.rios@usc.es; jrichard@buffalo.edu
41, 539–548.
(35) Bordwell, F. G.; Fried, H. E. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4327–4331.
(36) Crugeiras, J.; Rios, A.; Riveiros, E.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 15815–15824.
(37) Glasoe, P. K.; Long, F. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 188–190.
’
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
(
38) Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
129–3141.
39) Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
0297–10302.
40) Derived by assuming that the concentration of imine/iminium
We acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (Grant GM
9754 to J.P.R.), and the Ministerio de Educaci ꢀo n y Ciencia
and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Grant
CTQ2008-03462 to A.R. and J.C.) for generous support of this
work.
3
1
3
(
(
ion is negligible because only 1% of glycine is converted to the imine/
iminium ion adduct in the presence of 0.5 M acetone at pD 10.5.
’
REFERENCES
(41) The secondary solvent deuterium isotope effect for deprotona-
(
(
1) Rios, A.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8375–8376.
2) Rios, A.; Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
tion of 1-IM-L, 3-IM-L, and 2-IM by lyoxide ion is assumed to be the
same as that for deprotonation of acetone: Pocker, Y. Chem. Ind. 1959,
1383–1384.
(42) Richard, J. P.; Williams, G.; O’Donoghue, A. C.; Amyes, T. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2957–2968.
9
8
373–9385.
3) Rios, A.; Richard, J. P.; Amyes, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
251–8259.
(
3
182
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja110795m |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3173–3183