Original Papers 1345
and 3 by using different doses (range 20–100 µM). The IC50 values
calculated from cell viability dose-response curves obtained by
incubating HeLa cells for 72 h were 98 11 µM for 3 and 101
8 µM for 1.
20 min), and hispidulin-7-O-neohesperoside (1 mg, tR = 38 min).
Fraction E (248 mg, 1350–1410 mL), fraction G (77 mg, 1545–
1620 mL), and fraction I (115 mg, 1725–1830 mL) were directly
subjected to RP-HPLC with MeOH–H2O (2:3) as the eluent to give
pure verbascoside (2.4 mg, tR = 13 min), compound 5 (5.6 mg,
tR = 20 min), hispidulin-7-O-neohesperoside (7.4 mg, tR = 38 min)
from fraction E, isoacteoside (5.1 mg, tR = 20 min) from fraction G,
and luteolin-7-O-neohesperoside (2.2 mg, tR = 29 min) and hispi-
dulin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (2 mg, tR = 45 min) from fraction
I. Fraction N (120 mg, 1950–1995 mL) was purified by RP-HPLC
with MeOH–H2O (35:65) as the eluent to give pure rosmarinic
acid (6.6 mg, tR = 35 min). Part of the CHCl3–MeOH extract (10 g)
was chromatographed over Sephadex LH-20 column (5 × 70 cm,
flow rate 2.0 mL/min) using MeOH as the eluent and collecting
164 fractions of 20 mL that were grouped by TLC into twelve ma-
jor fractions (A–N). Fraction F (189 mg, 1220–1480 mL) was puri-
fied by RP-HPLC with MeOH–H2O (35:65) as the eluent to yield
phlinoside B (11.9 mg, tR = 22 min). Fraction H (70 mg, 2040–
2200 mL) was also purified by RP-HPLC with MeOH–H2O (2:3)
as the eluent to yield hispidulin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside
(8.6 mg, tR = 38 min). Part of the CHCl3 extract (10 g) was chroma-
tographed over silica gel column (9 × 20 cm) eluting with CHCl3
followed by increasing concentrations of MeOH in CHCl3 (be-
tween 1% and 50%, CHCl3 7.5 L, CHCl3-MeOH 99:1 3 L, CHCl3-
MeOH 98:2 4 L, CHCl3-MeOH 97:3 1.5 L, CHCl3-MeOH 95:5
3.5 L, CHCl3-MeOH 9:1 1 L, CHCl3-MeOH 1:1 1 L). Fractions of
75 mL were collected and grouped by TLC into 18 fractions (A–
T). Fraction H–L (1.6 g, 5.5–7.5 L) was purified by RP-HPLC with
MeOH–H2O (7:3) as the eluent to yield 2β-angeloyloxy-5β-hy-
droxy-7α,10β-methyl-eudesm-3-ene-1-one (1.5 mg, tR = 19 min).
Fraction O (500 mg, 12.4–13 L) was purified by RP-HPLC with
MeOH–H2O (3:2) as the eluent to yield 14,15-dihydro-15-hy-
Materials and Methods
!
General experimental procedures
Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarim-
eter equipped with a sodium lamp (589 nm) and a 1 dm micro-
cell. UV spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer-Lambda spec-
trophotometer. CD spectra were measured on a JASCO J-810
spectropolarimeter with a 0.1-cm cell in DMSO at room temper-
ature under the following conditions: speed 50 nm/min, time
constant 1 s, bandwidth 2.0 nm. NMR experiments were per-
formed on a Bruker DRX-600 spectrometer at 300 K. 2D NMR
spectra were acquired in CD3OD in the phase-sensitive mode
with the transmitter set at the solvent resonance and TPPI (time
proportional phase increment) was used to achieve frequency
discrimination in the ω1 dimension. The standard pulse sequence
and phase cycling were used for DQF-COSY, TOCSY, HSQC, HMBC,
and NOESY experiments. The NMR data were processed on a Sili-
con Graphic Indigo2 Workstation using UXNMR software. ESIMS
were obtained using a Finnigan LC‑Q Advantage Termoquest
spectrometer, equipped with Xcalibur software. HRESIMS were
acquired in the positive ion mode on a Q‑TOF premier spectrom-
eter (Waters-Milford). TLC was performed on precoated Kieselgel
60 F254 plates (Merck); compounds were detected by spraying
with Ce(SO4)2/H2SO4 (Sigma Aldrich) and NTS (Naturstoffe re-
agent)-PEG (Poliethylene glycol 4000) solutions. Column chro-
matography was performed over Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia);
reversed-phase (RP) HPLC separations were conducted on a Shi-
madzu LC-8A series pumping system equipped with a Shimadzu
RID10A refractive index detector and a Shimadzu injector, using a
C18 µ-Bondapak column (30 cm × 7.8 mm) and a mobile phase
consisting of MeOH‑H2O mixtures at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. GC
analyses were performed using a Dani GC 1000 instrument. Di-
molybdenum tetracetate was purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
droxy-3-epicarioptin (5.5 mg, tR = 11 min) and compound
1
(5.4 mg, tR = 22 min). Fraction Q (292 mg, 17.3–17.8 L) was puri-
fied by RP-HPLC with MeOH–H2O (2:3) as the eluent to yield
compound 2 (1.8 mg, tR = 27 min). Fractions R (294 mg, 19.7–
20.2 L) and S (270 mg, 20.3–20.4 L) were purified by RP-HPLC
with MeOH–H2O (45:55) as the eluent to yield compound 3
(1.8 mg, tR = 20 min) from fraction R and compound 4 (1.3 mg,
tR = 12 min) from fraction S. All the compounds met the criteria
of ≥ 95% purity, as inferred by HPLC and NMR analyses.
Plant material
Aerial parts of C. splendens G. Don were collected in El Zoharia Re-
search Garden of Cairo, Egypt, in March 2010 and identified by
Dr. Mamdouh Shokry (El Zoharia Research Garden, Cairo, Egypt).
The voucher specimen (No. 7191 C. splendens G. Don/1) was de-
posited at the Herbarium Hortii Botanici Pisani, Flora Aegyptiaca,
Pisa, Italy.
2α-acetoxy-3β-(2′,3′-diacetoxy-2′-methyl)-butanoyloxy-14-hy-
dro-15-hydroxyclerodin (1): colorless amorphous powder; [α]D25
− 9.4 (c 0.45, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see l Table 1; ESI MS
"
m/z 749 [M + Na]+, 689 [M + Na – 60]+, 531 [M + Na – 218]+, 489
[M + Na – 218–42]+, 471 [M + Na – 218–60]+, 411 [M + Na – 218–
60–60]+; HR ESIMS [M + H]+ 727.3204 (calcd. for C35H51O16
727.3177).
Extraction and isolation
3β,15-dihydroxy-14-hydro-clerodin (2): colorless amorphous
powder; [α]2D5 + 5.7 (c 0.15, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see
l Table 1; ESI MS m/z 491 [M + Na] , 431 [M + Na – 60] , 371 [M
+ Na – 60–60]+, 467 [M – H]−, 425 [M – H – 42]−, 383 [M – H – 42–
42]−; HR ESIMS m/z 469.2500 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C24H37O9
469.2438).
Dried powdered aerial parts of C. splendens (775 g) were succes-
sively and separately extracted for 48 h with n-hexane, CHCl3,
CHCl3–MeOH (9:1), and MeOH, by exhaustive maceration (2 L),
to give 15.6, 13.5, 21.7, 26.8 g of the respective residues. The
MeOH extract was partitioned between n-BuOH and H2O, to af-
ford an n-BuOH residue (5.7 g). The n-BuOH fraction was submit-
ted to a Sephadex LH-20 column (5 × 70 cm, flow rate 1.5 mL/
min) using MeOH as the eluent, yielding 133 fractions of 15 mL
that were grouped by TLC into twelve major fractions (A–N).
Fraction B (1 g, 810–1170 mL) was partitioned between n-BuOH
and H2O, to afford a n-BuOH residue (780 mg) that was purified
by RP-HPLC with MeOH–H2O (2:3) as the eluent to give pure
phlinoside B (9 mg, tR = 13 min), compound 5, (1.1 mg, tR =
+
+
"
2α,15-dihydroxy-3β-(2′-hydroxy-2′-methyl-3′-acetoxy)-butanoyl-
oxy-6α,18-diacetoxy-4α,17-epoxy-clerodan-11,16-lactone
(3):
colorless amorphous powder; [α]2D5 − 5.7 (c 0.11, MeOH); H and
1
13
+
"
C NMR data, see l Table 1; ESI MS m/z 665 [M + Na] , 605 [M +
Na – 60]+, 486 [M + Na – 176]+; HR ESIMS m/z [M + H]+ 643.2899
(calcd. for C31H47O14 643.2966).
3β,14S,15-trihydroxy-6α,18-diacetoxy-4α,17-epoxy-clerodan-
11,16-lactone (4): colorless amorphous powder; [α]2D5 + 2.6 (c
Faiella L et al. Diterpenes and Phenylpropanoids… Planta Med 2013; 79: 1341–1347