H.-X. Li, et al.
PhytochemistryLetters34(2019)25–29
Fig. 3. Key HMBC, 1H-1H COSY and ROESY correlations of compounds 3 and 4.
(B1–B3). Subfraction B1 was subjected to repeated silica gel CC eluting
with PE-acetone (40:1, v/v) and CHCl3-MeOH (100:1, v/v) to yield
compounds 15 (12 mg) and 16 (5 mg). Subfraction B3 was purified by a
silica gel CC eluting with CHCl3-MeOH (50:1, v/v), a Sephadex LH-20
CC (CHCl3-MeOH, 1:1, v/v) and a preparative HPLC (MeOH-H2O, 4:6,
v/v) to yield compounds 2 (70 mg), 11 (7 mg), 17 (30 mg) and 19
(5 mg). Fraction C (200 g) was purified by a silica gel CC (CHCl3-
acetone, 20:1 to 0:1, v/v) and repeated preparative HPLC (MeOH-H2O,
25%–45%, v/v) to give compounds 1 (140 mg), 3 (19 mg), 4 (16 g), 5
(20 mg), 6 (24 mg) and 7 (40 mg). Fraction D (100 g) was purified by a
silica gel CC (CHCl3-acetone, 5:1 to 1:1, v/v) and repeated preparative
HPLC (MeOH-H2O, 25%–45%, v/v) to give compounds 8 (410 mg) and
9 (18 mg).
Table 2
In vivo analgesic activities of compounds 1–10 (n = 5).
Sample
Dose (mg/kg)
Number of writhes (
x
s)
Inhibition (%)
Control
–
39.5
15.7
15.3
13.7
26.0
21.0
20.0
20.3
17.3
20.0
17.7
16.5
17.7
1.3
–
1
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
200
3.5*
2.1*
1.2*
3.6*
1.8*
2.6*
1.0*
1.2*
3.2*
1.5*
6.6*
3.2*
60.2
61.2
65.3
34.1
46.8
49.3
48.6
56.2
49.3
55.3
58.2
55.3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Indomethacin
Aspirin
The PE soluble portion (180 g) was divided into eight fractions
(I–VIII) by silica gel CC eluting with gradient PE-EtOAc (1:0 to 0:1, v/
v). Fraction IV (24 g) was subjected to repeated silica gel CC with PE-
EtOAc (80:1 to 0:1, v/v) to afford compound 10 (310 mg). Fraction VI
(6.5 g) was chromatographed on a MCI gel column (MeOH-H2O, 1:1 to
1:0, v/v) and a Sephadex LH-20 column (CHCl3-MeOH, 1:1, v/v), suc-
cessively, then was further purified by a silica gel column with PE-
EtOAc (20:1, v/v) to give compounds 12 (16 mg), 13 (18 mg), 14
(19 mg) and 18 (60 mg).
Control: 0.5% CMC-Na. Compared with the control group, *P < 0.05.
recorded by a Nicolet 380 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific,
Madison, WI, USA) with KBr pellets. Preparative HPLC analysis was
performed on a Shimadzu LC-20AP series instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto,
Japan). Silica gel (Qingdao Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, P. R.
China), Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and
MCI gel (75–150 μm; Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were
used for open column chromatography. Silica gel GF254 plates (Qingdao
Marine Chemical Ltd.) were used for thin layer chromatography (TLC)
detection.
3.3.1. Terngymnoside A (1)
Brownish yellow solid; [ ]D22 -29.3 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
λmax (log ε): 223 (4.27), 291 (3.82) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3375, 2953,
1730, 1617, 1522, 1445, 1282, 1179, 1076, 862, 802, 628 cm−1; HR-
ESI-MS m/z: 615.1725 [M−H]− (calcd for C30H31O14, 615.1719). 1H
and 13C NMR spectroscopic data see Table 1.
3.2. Plant material
The aerial parts of Ternstroemia gymnanthera (Wight et Arn.)
Beddome were collected in Yangbi County, Yunnan Province, P. R.
China, in July 2017 and identified by Dr. De-Quan Zhang at the College
of pharmacy and chemistry, Dali University, P. R. China. A voucher
specimen (NO. 2015 1008-6) has been deposited at the Institute of
Materia Medica, Dali University.
3.3.2. Terngymnoside B (2)
Brownish yellow solid; [ ]D22 -27.6 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
λmax (log ε): 224 (4.33), 285 (3.75) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3374, 2932,
1730, 1609, 1519, 1445, 1365, 1273, 1166, 1077, 862, 810, 619 cm−1
;
HR-ESI-MS m/z: 599.1761 [M−H]− (calcd for C30H31O13, 599.1770).
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data see Table 1.
3.3. Extraction and isolation
3.3.3. Terngymnoside C (3)
Brownish yellow solid; [ ]D22 -26.0 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
λmax (log ε): 223 (4.22), 291 (3.84) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3404, 2946,
2824, 1728, 1607, 1519, 1445, 1362, 1282, 1168, 1078, 776,
The air-dried aerial parts (14 kg) of T. gymnanthera were crushed
and soaked with 95% ethanol (60 L ×12 h × 8) at room temperature.
The ethanol extracts were evaporated to dryness under reduced pres-
sure by a rotary evaporator, and the residue (2.3 kg) was suspended in
water and partitioned with petroleum ether (PE) and ethyl acetate,
successively. The EtOAc soluble portion (726 g) was divided into seven
fractions (A–G) by silica gel column chromatography (CC) eluting with
gradient chloroform-methanol (1:0 to 0:1, v/v). Fraction A (16 g) was
chromatographed on a MCI gel column (MeOH-H2O, 1:1 to 1:0, v/v) to
yield compound 20 (40 mg). Fraction B (200 g) was subjected to a silica
gel CC (CHCl3-acetone, 9:1 to 0:1, v/v) to yield three subfractions
614 cm−1; HR-ESI-MS m/z: 465.1405 [M−H]− (calcd for C22H25O11
,
465.1402). 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data see Table 1.
3.3.4. Terngymnoside D (4)
Brownish yellow solid; [ ]D22 −60.0 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
λmax (log ε): 220 (4.38), 292 (3.99) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3369, 1725,
1607, 1524, 1446, 1363, 1286, 1194, 1113, 1079, 1011, 964, 798,
608 cm−1; HR-ESI-MS m/z: 615.1702 [M−H]− (calcd for C30H31O14
,
615.1719). 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data see Table 1.
28