this strongly reducing environment), and it has at least a C2
symmetry. These considerations provide an empirical formula
of C2(CH3)2H2N2.
The presence of two different groups of carbons is
supported by the vertical expansion of Figure 5 (see
Supporting Information) revealing splittings from two pairs
of 13C nuclei with splittings of 2.17 and 2.55 G. All of this
suggests that 1•- is a N,N′-dimethyl-1,4-diazabutadiene anion
radical.
As in the alkyl-substituted butadiene anion radicals,6 1•-
can be in the cis or trans configuration (Scheme 1); this issue
can be resolved via DFT calculations.
Scheme 1. cis-trans Equilibrium of the Diimine Anion Radical,
Lying Predominantly in the Direction of the trans Isomer
Figure 4. (Upper) Low-field half of the x-band EPR spectrum
obtained from the K over-reduction of p-nitrophenol in per-
deuterated-HMPA. (Lower) A computer simulation using aD’s )
2
2
1.21 G (6 Hs), 0.637 G (2 Hs), and 6.01 G for two 14N’s. I ) 1
for all of the nuclear spins and the ∆wpp ) 0.20 G. The g-tensor
anisotropy effects due to the nitrogen splitting were included in
the simulation. The arrow marks the spectral center.
equivalent deuteriums of aD ) 0.637 to aH ) 4.15 G and I
) 1 to 1/2 reveals a near perfect fit (see Figure 5) to the
original spectrum shown in Figure 1.
The B3LYP//6-311++G** calculation predicts the trans
isomer to be of lower energy by 4.06 kcal/mol. The B3LYP//
6-311++G**/EPR-III computed electron-nuclear couplings
(blue) compare favorably, except for aN, to the empirical
values (red). Volumes have been written, and not without
controversy,7 concerning calculated aN’s and the reasons for
poor and good agreement with the empirical values. Interest-
ingly, EPR-II predicts an aN of 6.11 G which is very close,
but EPR-II makes poor predictions for the non-nitrogen
coupling constants. EPR-III, however, predicts less than half
of the empirical value of 6.01 G (see Supporting Informa-
tion).
A reasonable mechanism for the initial formation of the
cis configuration of 1•- involves the attack of the phenolic
Figure 5. (Upper) Low-field half of the x-band EPR spectrum
obtained from the potassium over-reduction of p-nitrophenol in
isotopically natural abundance HMPA. (Lower) This spectrum was
computer simulated using coupling constants of 7.870 G for six
H’s, 4.145 G for two H’s, and 6.01 G for two 14N’s. The vertical
arrow marks the spectral center, and ∆wpp ) 0.25 G.
(6) Gerson, F.; Hopf, H.; Merstetter, P.; Mlynek, C.; Fischer, D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4815–4824.
(7) (a) Hermosilla, L.; Calle, P.; Garcia de la Vega, J. M.; Sieiro, C. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 13600–13608. (b) Engels, B. Calculation of NMR
and EPR Parameters Theory and Applications; Kaup, M., Buhl, M., Malkin,
V. G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; pp 483-492. (c) Wetmore,
S. D.; Boyd, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 9332–934. (d) Bartra, R.;
Giese, B.; Spichty, M.; Gescheidt, G.; Houk, K. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 18371–18379.
A somewhat redundant but revealing experiment involves
the use of NO2-C6H4-OD, which expresses no incorpora-
tion of deuterium into 1•-. The HMPA degradation product
is composed only of atoms originating from the HMPA. We
also know that (1•-) is N to N conjugated, having the set of
two protons on carbons (the H-N bond cannot endure under
(8) (a) Wertz, J. E.; Bolton, J. R. Electron Spin Resonance; McGraw-
Hill: New York, 1986; pp 58-60. (b) Atkins, P.; de Paula, J. Physical
Chemistry, 7th ed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, 2002; pp 432-435. (c)
See also: Wiberg, K. B.; Rablen, P. R.; Marquez, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 8654–8668.
(9) Franz, K. D.; Dieck, T. H.; Starzewski, K. A. O.; HohMann, F.
Tetrahedron 1975, 31, 1465–1469.
4566
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009