1804
Md. I. H. KHAN et al.
Table 2. Steady-State Kinetics Parameters of Mutant Enzymes in Reductive Amination Reaction
ꢃ1
)
Km (mM)
NH4Cl
kcat (sꢃ1
)
kcat=Km (sꢃ1ꢂmM
2-OG
Enzyme
2-OG
OAA
NADH
2-OG
OAA
OAA
Wild type
G82K
M101S
0.65
>100
>100
NDa
4.16
2.27
55.1
125
135
0.07
0.095
0.091
344
0.013
0.012
NDa
3.45
5.68
529
<10ꢃ5
<10ꢃ5
NDa
0.829
2.50
aND, Not detectable.
OAA, we determined the kinetic parameters of those
two mutants. The steady-state kinetic parameters of the
wild-type and the mutant enzymes are shown in Table 2.
G82K showed a kcat value of 3.45 sꢃ1 for OAA
compared to its kcat value of 0.013 sꢃ1 for 2-OG. The
former value was 265 fold higher than the latter one, and
was 1.2% of that of the wild-type enzyme for 2-OG. The
Km values of G82K for OAA and NADH were 4.16 and
0.095 mM respectively, whereas for 2-OG the Km was
greater than 100 mM indicating that the G82K mutant
showed binding affinity good enough to endorse dehy-
drogenation catalysis of OAA but not of 2-OG.
Similarly, the kcat value of M101S for OAA was
5.68 sꢃ1, which is 1.7% of that of wild-type enzyme
for 2-OG, whereas the kcat value for 2-OG was
0.012 sꢃ1, showing that about a 473-fold higher catalytic
shift had been achieved for OAA. The Km values of
M101S for OAA, NADH, and 2-OG were 2.27, 0.091,
and greater than 100 mM respectively. Therefore, the
estimated catalytic efficiency, kcat=Km values of G82K
that Met101 is close to the ꢁ-carboxyl group of OAA
and that the hydroxyl group of Ser101 therefore makes a
hydrogen bond with that of one ꢁ-carboxylate oxygen of
OAA, and thus facilitates binding and catalysis. The
most evident means of achieving the changed specificity
of the substrate is to change the substrate binding
residues without disturbing the catalytic residues ex-
clusively involved in catalytic chemistry. G82K and
M101S, however, still display low kcat values for OAA
in relation to the figure for the wild-type enzyme with its
natural substrate, 2-OG. It might be more fruitful to
combine molecular evolutionary engineering with spe-
cific selection to achieve further subtle improvements in
catalytic capability. In addition, we are making progress
in resolving the crystal structure of these single mutant
enzymes and hope to identify the details of the structural
basis of their substrate specificities to OAA.
Acknowledgments
ꢃ1
and M101S for OAA were 0.829 and 2.50 sꢃ1ꢂmM
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (C) (no. 15580079) from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan.
respectively. Although these kcat=Km values were 0.16
and 0.47% of that of wild-type enzyme for 2-OG
(529 sꢃ1ꢂmMꢃ1), the use of a large amount of mutant
enzymes gave comparable activities of aspartate dehy-
drogenase (AspDH). Furthermore, in the oxidative
deamination reactions, the single mutants G82K and
M101S showed specific activity on L-aspartate 0.39 and
0.21 unitꢂmgꢃ1 respectively. Hence the NADPþ-type
AspDH from archaea, the only one found in nature, has
been reported to show low Kcat 4.9 sꢃ1 even at temper-
atures as high as 70 ꢀC.11)
References
1) Ohshima, T., and Soda, K., Biochemistry and biotech-
nology of amino acid dehydrogenases. Adv. Biochem.
Eng. Biotechnol., 42, 187–189 (1990).
2) Olson, J. A., and Anfinsen, C. B., Kinetic and equilib-
rium studies on crystalline L-glutamic acid dehydrogen-
ase. J. Biol. Chem., 202, 841–856 (1953).
The differences in substrate specificity can be ascrib-
ed to the amino acid residues that line in the active site
pocket; very small changes that orient active site
residues with that of its native substrate can play a
large role in substrate binding and catalysis. The 3D
structures of the G82K-OAA, G82K-2-OG, M101S-
OAA, and M101S-2OG complexes were determined by
using the MOE 2004.03 docking program. Because
OAA is a smaller molecule than 2-OG, the G82 residue,
which forms the active site pocket, is assumed to be
closer to the ꢁ-carboxylic group of OAA than to the ꢀ-
carboxylic group of 2-OG. Conversion by lysine residue
might ensure binding of the "-amino group of Lys82
with one of the ꢁ-carboxylate oxygens of OAA
effectively through a salt bridge. The possibility of
M101S forming complex with OAA, similarly, suggests
3) Struck, J., and Sizer, I. W., The substrate specificity of
glutamate dehydrogenase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 86,
260–266 (1960).
4) Britton, K. L., Baker, P. J., Engel, P. C., Rice, D. W., and
Stillman, T. J., Evolution of substrate diversity in the
superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenases: Prospects
for rational chiral synthesis. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 938–945
(1993).
5) Britton, K. L., Baker, P. J., Rice, D. W., and Stillman,
T. J., Structural relationship between the hexameric and
tetrameric family of glutamate dehydrogenases. Eur. J.
Biochem., 209, 851–859 (1992).
6) Stillman, T. J., Baker, P. J., Britton, K. L., and Rice,
D. W., Conformational flexibility in glutamate dehydro-
genase: role of water in substrate recognition and
catalysis. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 1131–1139 (1993).
7) Baker, P. J., Britton, K. L., Engel, P. C., Farrants, G. W.,