7
T. Murase and M. Fujita, Chem. Rec., 2010, 10, 342–347.
8 T. Murase, S. Horiuchi and M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
866–2867.
9 T. Murase, S. Peschard, S. Horiuchi, Y. Nishioka and M. Fujita,
Supramol. Chem., 2011, 23, 199–208.
Table 2 Liquid-phase Cu-mediated reduction of dimethyl azidoter-
ephthalate
a
2
b
Entry
Cu source (eq.)
Ligand (eq.)
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
Cu(ACN)
Cu(ACN)
Cu(ACN)
Cu(ACN)
Cu(ACN)
None
4
4
4
4
4
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
6
6
6
6
6
(0.25)
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)
Propylamine (5.5)
Propylamine (5.5)
Propylamine (2.75)
Propylamine (1)
None
Propylamine (5.5)
Propylamine (5.5)
Propylamine (5.5)
50
100
10
10 Y. Inokuma, M. Kawano and M. Fujita, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 349–358.
11 R. K. Deshpande, J. L. Minnaar and S. G. Telfer, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 4598–4602.
5
1
2 H. Sato, R. Matsuda, K. Sugimoto, M. Takata and S. Kitagawa, Nat.
Mater., 2010, 9, 661–666.
3 K. K. Tanabe, C. A. Allen and S. M. Cohen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
010, 49, 9730–9733.
4 R. K. Deshpande, G. I. N. Waterhouse, G. B. Jameson and S. G. Telfer,
,5
,1
,1
,1
1
2
Cu(acac) (0.5)
2
CuO (0.5)
1
Reaction conditions: dimethyl azidoterephthalate (0.09 mmol) in
THF (3 mL) with copper and ligand stirred for 12 h at room
temperature. Equivalents of copper and ligand are indicated in
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1574–1576.
15 H. B. Zhao, H. Fu and R. Z. Qiao, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 3311–3316.
16 Y. Monguchi, T. Maejima, S. Mori, T. Maegawa and H. Sajiki, Chem.–
Eur. J., 2010, 16, 7372–7375.
b
1
brackets. Determined using H NMR analysis.
1
1
7 Y. Goriya and C. V. Ramana, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 7642–7650.
8 T. Gadzikwa, O. K. Farha, C. D. Malliakas, M. G. Kanatzidis, J. T.
Hupp and S. T. Nguyen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13613–13614.
4 6
amount of Cu(ACN) PF from 5.5 to 2.75 equivalents reduces the
yield from 100 to 50% (entry 1).
1
9 T. Gadzikwa, G. Lu, C. L. Stern, S. R. Wilson, J. T. Hupp and S. T.
Nguyen, Chem. Commun., 2008, 5493–5495.
We thus determined that for this reaction to proceed, both
copper(I) species and nitrogen-coordinating ligands are required,
as found in the MOF 3a.
2
0 Y. Goto, H. Sato, S. Shinkai and K. Sada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
30, 14354–14355.
1 M. Savonnet, D. Bazer-Bachi, N. Bats, J. Perez-Pellitero, E. Jeanneau,
1
2
Based on these findings, we can postulate that, in the MOF 3a,
the reduction of azido occurs via the oxidation of the copper(I)
triazolylmethanamine complex in its vicinity, to give the
corresponding amino and N . After N removal, protons of Cu-
V. Lecocq, C. Pinel and D. Farrusseng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
4518–4519.
2
2 J. Canivet, S. Aguado, C. Daniel and D. Farrusseng, ChemCatChem,
011, 3, 675–678.
3 C. J. Doonan, W. Morris, H. Furukawa and O. M. Yaghi, J. Am.
2
2
2
2
coordinated water molecules (Scheme 2) are transferred to the
remaining nitrogen to form the aryl amine. Indeed, Cu(II) dosing
using a SQUID magnetometer shows an increase of the quantity
of this ion under reaction conditions (100 uC under vacuum, see
ESI{) since Cu(II) quantity increases from 0.61 wt% to 0.64 wt%.
In conclusion, we report here for the first time the self-reactivity
of a MOF through the reaction between two of its functionalities
anchored on its walls. A MOF-supported copper complex,
introduced by click chemistry and characterized by EPR, was
found to reduce some of the remaining azido functions in the
MOF in the solid state by gentle heating under vacuum, the
temperature used being much lower than that of the azide self-
decomposition. Moreover, this case study could allow new insight
into the mechanism of the copper-mediated azide reduction.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9492–9493.
24 M. J. Ingleson, J. P. Barrio, J. B. Guilbaud, Y. Z. Khimyak and M. J.
Rosseinsky, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2680–2682.
25 W. Morris, C. J. Doonan, H. Furukawa, R. Banerjee and O. M. Yaghi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12626–12627.
6 Z. Q. Wang and S. M. Cohen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1315–1329.
2
27 Z. Q. Wang, K. K. Tanabe and S. M. Cohen, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48,
2
96–306.
8 X. Zhang, F. Llabres and A. Corma, J. Catal., 2009, 265, 155–160.
9 K. Barthelet, J. Marrot, G. Ferey and D. Riou, Chem. Commun., 2004,
20–521.
2
2
5
30 BASF, PCT Appl. WO2008129051, 2008.
31 A. Fateeva, P. Horcajada, T. Devic, C. Serre, J. Marrot, J. M.
Greneche, M. Morcrette, J. M. Tarascon, G. Maurin and G. Ferey, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem., 2010, 3789–3794.
32 C. Volkringer, M. Meddouri, T. Loiseau, N. Guillou, J. Marrot, G.
Ferey, M. Haouas, F. Taulelle, N. Audebrand and M. Latroche, Inorg.
Chem., 2008, 47, 11892–11901.
3 M. Savonnet, D. Bazer-Bachi, C. Pinel, V. Lecocq, N. Bats and D.
3
Notes and references
Farrusseng, FR Pat., 2951722, 2009.
3
4 V. Sendra, S. Gambarelli, B. Bersch and J. Coves, J. Inorg. Biochem.,
009, 103, 1721–1728.
5 S. Van Doorslaer, G. M. Cereghetti, R. Glockshuber and A. Schweiger,
1
2
3
G. Cohn, Chem. Rev., 1948, 42, 527–579.
2
G. Kaupp, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 254, 95–183.
M. Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T. Okano and M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 3243–3247.
T. Kawamichi, T. Kodama, M. Kawano and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8030–8032.
M. Yoshizawa, J. K. Klosterman and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 3418–3438.
K. Ikemoto, Y. Inokuma and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010,
3
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 1631–1639.
36 S. Gambarelli, F. Luttringer, D. Padovani, E. Mulliez and M.
Fontecave, ChemBioChem, 2005, 6, 1960–1962.
37 A. M. Tyryshkin, S. A. Dikanov, E. J. Reijerse, C. Burgard and J.
H u¨ ttermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3396–3406.
38 P. Dorlet, S. Gambarelli, P. Faller and C. Hureau, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 9273–9276.
4
5
6
49, 5750–5752.
4
108 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 4105–4108
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012