JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
ARTICLE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
cell-surface interactions, what led to the formation of spheri-
cal aggregates of cells.
8 P. Goddard, L. E. Hutchinson, J. Brown, L. J. Brookman, J.
Control. Release 1989, 10, 5–16.
9
F. C. Gaertner, R. Luxenhofer, B. Blechert, R. Jordan, M.
Essler, J. Control. Release 2007, 119, 291–300.
0 D. Christova, R. Velichkova, W. Loos, E. J. Goethals, F. D.
CONCLUSIONS
1
Poly(2-oxazoline)-based hydrogels have recently been recog-
nized as promising scaffolds for the cultivation of fibro-
Prez, Polym. (Guildf). 2003, 44, 2255–2261.
11 T. R. Dargaville, R. Forster, B. L. Farrugia, K. Kempe, L.
Voorhaar, U. S. Schubert, R. Hoogenboom, Macromol. Rapid
Commun. 2012, 33, 1695–1700.
1
2
45
blast,
as well as cancer cell lines.
Up to date, the
cultivation studies were limited to the poly(2-oxazoline)s
crosslinked by thiol-ene click reaction. In our work, we
focused on the hydrogels prepared by the copolymerization
of (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) with bis(2-oxazoline) crosslinkers.
1
2 B. L. Farrugia, K. Kempe, U. S. Schubert, R. Hoogenboom,
T. R. Dargaville, Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2724–2732.
3 M. Hartlieb, D. Pretzel, K. Kempe, C. Fritzsche, R. M. Paulus,
1
M. Gottschaldt, U. S. Schubert, Soft Matter 2013, 9, 4693–4704.
We synthesized a series of hydrogels by copolymerization of
14 C. Legros, M. C. De Pauw-Gillet, K. C. Tam, S.
Lecommmandoux, D. Taton, Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 4801–4808.
2
1
-ethyl-2-oxazoline with three different bis(2-oxazoline)s –
0
0
15 C. Legros, M. Pauw-gillet, De, K. Chiu, S. Lecommandoux,
D. Taton, Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 62, 322–330.
,4-butylene-2,2 -bis(2-oxazoline),
1,6-hexamethylene-2,2 -
0
bis(2-oxazoline), and 1,8-octamethylene-2,2 -bis(2-oxazoline).
The bis(2-oxazoline) crosslinkers with the longer aliphatic
chain were used for the preparation of hydrogels for the first
time. Hydrogels showed a comparable SD in distilled water,
ethanol, and dichloromethane. The SD in water varied with
the type and molar percentage of crosslinker from
1
6 A. M. Kelly, F. Wiesbrock, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012,
3, 1632–1647.
3
1
7 U. S. Schubert, M. Hartlieb, K. Kempe, J. Mater. Chem. B 2014,
8 Y. Chujo, K. Sada, K. Matsumoto, T. Saegusa, Macromole-
1
cules 1990, 23, 1234–1237.
9 J. Rueda, R. Suica, H. Komber, B. Voit, Macromol. Chem.
Phys. 2003, 204, 954–960.
0 A. M. Kelly, A. Hecke, B. Wirnsberger, F. Wiesbrock, Macro-
mol. Rapid Commun. 2011, 32, 1815–1819.
1 V. Schenk, E. Rossegger, C. Ebner, F. Bangerl, K.
1
21.32 6 0.88 for 2% ButBisOx, to 1.72 6 0.16 for 10% Oct-
BisOx. Young’s modulus varied from 11.5 6 4 kPa for 2%
ButBisOx to 85.6 6 17.1 kPa for 10% OctBisOx. The hydro-
gels with lower crosslinking density and a shorter aliphatic
chain of crosslinker were well tolerated by fibroblast 3T3
cells in both contact and extract toxicity studies. The pancre-
atic bTC3 cells were cultivated within the hydrogels for 12
days and formed spherical aggregates. The modification of
hydrogel samples to promote the cell adhesion will be the
subject of the ongoing studies.
2
2
Reichmann, B. Hoffmann, M. H o€ pfner, F. Wiesbrock, Polym.
(Basel) 2014, 6, 264–279.
22 M. Hartlieb, S. Schubert, K. Kempe, N. Windhab, U. S.
Schubert, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014, 53, 10–14.
23 T. Li, H. Tang, P. Wu, Soft Matter 2015, 11, 1911–1918.
24 J. C. Rueda, H. Komber, B. Voit, J. Polym. Sci. Part A:
Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 122–128.
2
5 L. N eꢀ ry, H. Lefebvre, A. Fradet, Macromol. Chem. Phys.
003, 204, 1755–1764.
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
26 T. Morisaku, J. Watanabe, T. Konno, M. Takai, K. Ishihara,
Polym. (Guildf). 2008, 49, 4652–4657.
The authors thank the Slovak Grant Agency, VEGA, for the finan-
cial support in the projects No. 2/0163/15 and 2/0156/15.
A. Zahoranov ꢀa wants to acknowledge I. Chodak and O. Sluciak
for their useful advices and comments.
2
7 M. B. Ahmad, M. B. Huglins, Polym. Int. 1994, 33, 273–277.
8 V. Schenk, E. Rossegger, C. Ebner, F. Bangerl, K.
2
Reichmann, B. Hoffmann, M. H o€ pfner, F. Wiesbrock, Polym.
Basel) 2014, 6, 264–279.
9 M. Glassner, D. R. D’hooge, J. Young Park, P. H. M. Van
(
2
Steenberge, B. D. Monnery, M. F. Reyniers, R. Hoogenboom,
REFERENCES AND NOTES
Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 65, 298–304.
3
0 S. Yang, K. F. Leong, Z. Du, C. K. Chua, Tissue Eng. 2001, 7,
1
M. W. Tibbitt, K. S. Anseth, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103,
6
79–689.
655–663.
3
2
1 F. G. Thankam, J. Muthu, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
014, 35, 111–122.
2
3
4
D. Seliktar, Science (80-) 2012, 336, 1124–1128.
R. Hoogenboom, H. Schlaad, Polym. (Basel) 2011, 3, 467–488.
R. Luxenhofer, Y. Han, A. Schulz, J. Tong, Z. He, A. V.
3
2 S. H. Kim, C. C. Chu, J Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 53, 258–
66.
2
Kabanov, R. Jordan, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33,
3
3 J. T. Y. Lee, K. L. Chow, Scanning 2012, 34, 12–25.
1613–1631.
5
J. Kronek, Z. Kronekov aꢀ , J. Lusto nꢁ , E. Paulovi cˇ ov aꢀ , L.
3
4 M. Tanaka, T. Hayashi, S. Morita, Polym. J. 2013, 45, 701–
Paulovi cˇ ov aꢀ , B. Mendrek, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22,
7
10.
1
725–1734.
35 A. Kishi, M. Tanaka, A. Mochizuki, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008,
11, 476–481.
36 P. Kas aꢀ k, Z. Kronekov aꢀ , I. Krupa, I. Lac ꢀı k, Polym.(Guildf).
011, 52, 3011–3020.
J. Kronek, E. Paulovi cˇ ov aꢀ , L. Paulovi cˇ ov aꢀ , Z. Kronekov aꢀ , J.
1
6
Lusto nꢁ , J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 1457–1464.
R. Luxenhofer, G. Sahay, A. Schulz, D. Alakhova, T. K.
Bronich, R. Jordan, A. V. Kabanov, J. Control. Release 2011,
53, 73–82.
2
7
37 D. E. Discher, P. Janmey, Y. L. Wang, Science (80-.) 2005,
310, 1139–1143.
1
1
558
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2016, 54, 1548–1559