R. Chokchaisiri et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 5 (2012) 361–366
365
increasing proportion of the more polar solvent and followed by
Sephadex LH-20, eluted with MeOH, to yield compound
(KBr) 3491, 1654, 1594, 1497, 1431, 1344, 1289, 1212, 1159, 1126,
1080, 1039 cmꢁ1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRTOFMS (ES,
negative ion mode) m/z 607.1656 [MꢁH]ꢁ (calc. for C28H32O15–H,
607.1663).
9
(Suksamrarn et al., 2008) (28.1 mg) as prisms, m.p. 129–130 8C
(EtOAc–n-hexane), lit. 129–130 8C (Suksamrarn et al., 2008).
Fraction E2 (15.2 g) was chromatographed, eluting under isocratic
condition of CH2Cl2–MeOH (100:2) followed by Sephadex LH-20,
eluted with MeOH, to yield compound 10 (Suksamrarn et al., 1994,
3.7. Rhamnocitrin 3-O-
a
-L
-rhamnopyranosyl-(1!2)-O-
a-L-
arabinopyranoside (4)
2008) (67.2 mg), ½a D26
ꢁ1.73 (c 1.48, EtOH). Compound 10 was
ꢀ
shown to be a 3:1 mixture of 3S and 3R enantiomers by the
modified Mosher’s method (Dale and Mosher, 1973; Ohtani et al.,
1991) in the same manner as described in the previous work
(Suksamrarn et al., 2008). Fraction E3 (42.1 g) was subjected to
column chromatography twice, using CH2Cl2–MeOH (100:3) to
furnish compound 11 (Suksamrarn et al., 2008) (111.4 mg), m.p.
99–100 8C (from CH2Cl2–n-hexane), lit. 100–101 8C (Suksamrarn
Pale yellow amorphous solid; ½a D30
ꢁ155.2 (c 0.18, MeOH); UV
ꢀ
(MeOH) lmax (log e) 350 (4.30), 266 (4.36), 207 (4.56) nm; IR nmax
(KBr) 3491, 1657, 1594, 1513, 1497, 1447, 1431, 1345, 1289, 1212,
1159, 1127, 1078 cmꢁ1 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1;
;
HRTOFMS (ES, negative ion mode) m/z 577.1556 [MꢁH]ꢁ (calc. for
C27H30O14–H, 577.1557).
et al., 2008), ½a D28
ꢀ
ꢁ5.2 (c 0.41, EtOH). The absolute stereochemistry
3.8. Acid hydrolysis of 1
of 11 was determined to be 3S by the modified Mosher’s method.
Fraction E4 (63.2 g) was subjected to column chromatography
eluted with solvents of increasing polarity, CH2Cl2, CH2Cl2–MeOH
and MeOH, to give 6 subfractions. Subfraction 3 (178.3 mg) upon
standing yellow solid separated out, which was rechromato-
graphed eluting under isocratic condition with CH2Cl2–MeOH
(100:5) to furnish compound 1 (13.1 mg) and compound 2
(23.4 mg). The mother liquor was evaporated and the residue
(97.8 mg) was chromatographed on a Sephadex LH-20 column
eluting with MeOH, followed by repeated column chromatography
eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (100:8) to yield compound 5 (Zong
et al., 2009) (15.4 mg) as yellow amorphous solid, m.p. 241–242 8C
(from MeOH), lit. 251–253 8C (MeOH) (Abou-Shoer et al., 1993);
A mixture of 1 (10 mg) in EtOH (10 ml) and 5% HCl (10 ml) was
heated at 80 8C for 3 h. The mixture was neutralized with 5% aq.
K2CO3 and EtOH was evaporated under reduced pressure. The
mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢂ 15 ml) to give the
aglycone (1.5 mg) which was identified as 7,30-di-O-methyl-
quercetin or rhammazin by comparison of spectroscopic data
with those reported in the literature (Subhadhirasakul et al.,
2003). Most of the water was removed by azeotropic distillation
with n-BuOH under reduced pressure. The sugar in the
concentrated water-soluble portion was compared with stan-
dard sugars on a TLC plate, with n-BuOH–EtOAc–iso-PrOH–
AcOH–H2O (7:20:12:7:6) as developing solvent system (Ngou-
nou et al., 2000) and the spots were detected with the
anisaldehyde reagent. The Rf value of arabinose, lyxose, ribose
and xylose was 0.38, 0.46, 0.45, and 0.47, respectively. The sugar
component was identified as arabinose. The inorganic salt was
removed from the concentrated aq. solution by repeated
½
a 2D9
ꢀ
ꢁ79.7 (c 0.20, MeOH), lit. ½aꢀD ꢁ49 (c 0.1, MeOH) (Abou-Shoer
et al., 1993). Subfraction 4 was separated on Sephadex LH-20
column, eluting with MeOH, followed by silica column chroma-
tography, eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (100:6), to afford compound
6 (Wang and Lee, 1999) (15.4 mg) as yellow needles, m.p. 249–
250 8C (from MeOH), lit. 250–251 8C (MeOH) (Wang and Lee,
precipitation with MeOH to yield
a
-arabinose (1.86 mg), ½a D30
ꢀ
1999); ½a 2D9
ꢀ
ꢁ120.4 (c 0.51, pyridine), lit. ½a D23
ꢀ
ꢁ97.2 (c 0.72,
+70.9 (c = 0.186, H2O), lit. ½a D30
ꢀ
+103 (Arima and Danno, 2002).
pyridine) (Wang and Lee, 1999). Subfraction 5 was chromato-
graphed on Sephadex LH-20 twice, eluted with MeOH and then
subjected to repeated reversed phase RP-18 using MeOH–H2O
Positive optical rotation indicated that this sugar is
(Arima and Danno, 2002).
L-arabinose
(30:70) to afford compounds
4
(11.6 mg) and
3
(24.8 mg).
3.9. Acetylation of 1
Subfraction 6 was purified by Sephadex LH-20 using MeOH to
give compound 7 (4.4 mg).
Compound 1 (2.0 mg) was dissolved in pyridine (1 ml) and
Ac2O (8 drops) was added. The mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 6 h. Water (10 ml) was added and the mixture
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢂ 15 ml). The combined CH2Cl2
layer was washed with water and evaporated under reduced
pressure to dryness. The crude mixture was purified by Sephadex
3.4. Rhamnazin 3-O-a-L-arabinopyranoside (1)
Pale yellow needles; m.p. 240–241 8C (MeOH); ½a D29
ꢁ87.3 (c
ꢀ
0.52, pyridine); UV (MeOH) lmax (log e) 355 (4.30), 255 (4.38), 208
(4.58) nm; IR
n
max (KBr) 3287, 1661, 1606, 1590, 1520, 1498, 1340,
LH-20, eluting with MeOH, to give rhamnazin 3-O-
pyranoside 5,40,200,300,400-pentaacetate (1a) (2.4 mg), 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz)
7.94 (1H, d, J = 1.1 Hz, H-20), 7.59 (1H, dd,
a-L-arabino-
1292, 1208, 1093, 1073, 1007 cmꢁ1
;
1H and 13C NMR data, see
Table 1; HRTOFMS (ES, negative ion mode) m/z 461.1097 [MꢁH]ꢁ
d
(calc. for C22H22O11–H, 461.1084).
J = 8.4, 1.1 Hz, H-60), 7.12 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-50), 6.78 (1H, d,
J = 1.8 Hz, H-6), 6.58 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-8), 5.51 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz,
H-100), 5.35 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 7.2 Hz, H-200), 5.21 (1H, m, W1/2 = 7 Hz,
H-400), 5.13 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 3.3 Hz, H-300), 3.79 (1H, dd, J = 13.0,
2.4 Hz, H-500b), 3.51 (1H, br d, J = 13.0 Hz, H-500a), 3.96 (3H, s, 30-
OCH3), 3.88 (3H, s, 7-OCH3), 2.43 (3H, s, 5-OAc), 2.32 (3H, s, 40-
OAc), 2.09 (3H, s, OAc), 2.06 (3H, s, OAc), 2.01 (3H, s, OAc); ES-MS
m/z: 673 [M+H]+.
3.5. Rhamnocitrin 3-O-a-L-arabinopyranoside (2)
Pale yellow needles; m.p. 242–243 8C (MeOH); ½a D29
ꢁ95.0 (c
ꢀ
0.74, pyridine); UV (MeOH) lmax (log e) 349 (4.25), 266 (4.31), 207
(4.46) nm; IR
nmax (KBr) 3209, 1661, 1601, 1586, 1498, 1343, 1288,
1212, 1182, 1079, 1010 cmꢁ1
;
1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1;
HRTOFMS (ES, negative ion mode) m/z 431.0980 [MꢁH]ꢁ (calc. for
C20H21O10–H, 431.0978).
3.10. Acid hydrolysis of 2
3.6. Rhamnazin 3-O-
a
-
L
-rhamnopyranosyl-(1!2)-O-
a
-
L
-
Compound 2 (10 mg) was subjected to hydrolysis in the same
manner employed for compound 1 to yield rhamnocitrin or
kaempferol 7-O-methyl ether (2.1 mg). The identity of the
flavonoid was confirmed by comparison of spectroscopic data
with the reported values (Iwashina and Ootani, 1990).
arabinopyranoside (3)
Pale yellow amorphous solid; ½a D30
ꢁ97.7 (c 0.90, MeOH); UV
ꢀ
(MeOH) lmax (log e) 353 (4.23), 255 (4.32), 207 (4.52) nm; IR nmax