Communication
RSC Advances
the high cost of purifying media post fermentation, we also
studied the effect of impurities on PG formation over 5%Ru/C
catalyst. The postfermentation medium for L. delbrueckii PCM
4 Z. Zhang, D. J. Miller and J. E. Jackson, US Patent 6,403,844
B1, 2002.
5 T. A. Werpy, J. G. Fryye, A. H. Zacher and D. J. Miller, US
Patent 7,038,094 B2, 2006.
490 was catalytically reduced as an untreated sample, as well as
the samples which had undergone purication on active carbon
6 Merchant Research & Consulting Ltd., World Propylene
Glycol Market, 2014, http://mcgroup.co.uk/news/20140418/
propylene-glycol-market-reach-supplydemand-balance-
2015.html.
7 M. Pagliaro and M. Rossi, The future of glycerol, RSC Green
Chemistry No 8, ISBN: 978-1-84973-046-4, The Royal Society
of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
8 M. A. Dasari, P.-P. Kiatsimkul, W. R. Sutterlin and
G. J. Suppes, Appl. Catal., A, 2005, 281(1–2), 225–231.
9 J. Feng, H. Fu, J. Wang, R. Li, H. Chen and X. Li, Catal.
Commun., 2008, 9(6), 1458.
ꢁ
1
(
ERCARBON GE, 3 g 50 mL ) or on a mixture of active carbon
ꢁ
1
and silica (POCH Gliwice SA, 5 g 50 mL ) (Table 3).
Hydrogenation of LA was performed in a 50 mL autoclave
ꢀ
(
Parr Company) at a temperature of 130 C and under 3.5 MPa of
H pressure. The reactions were conducted with equal amounts
2
of catalyst (mcat ¼ 0.5 g). The mixture was stirred at 500 rpm.
The autoclave was ushed with Ar, then ushed again with H ,
2
and pressurized with H
gradually raised to 130 C at a heating rate of 20 C min . The
reaction was sustained for 4 hours. The reaction conditions
2
to 3.5 MPa. The temperature was
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ1
were optimized for 5%Ru/C catalyst (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS 10 M. G. Musolino, L. A. Scarpino, F. Mauriello and
06180) (Fig. 4). Aer the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to R. Pietropaolo, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 1511.
room temperature and the reaction mixture ltered and 11 E. S. Vasiliadou, T. M. Eggenhuisen, P. Munnik, P. E. de
2
analyzed using an HPLC (LaChrome, Merck-Hitachi with UV
detector) to determine the concentration of lactic acid. Products
Jongh, K. P. de Jong and A. A. Lemonidou, Appl. Catal., B,
2014, 145, 108.
of LA hydrogenation were also screened for using GC-FID 12 S. Zhau, X. Gao, Y. Zhau, Y. Zhau, H. Zheng and Y. Li,
analysis (Hewlet Packard 5890A with FID detector). The liquid J. Catal., 2013, 303, 70.
products were also analyzed using a PerkinElmer GC-MS (model 13 P. M ¨a ki-Arvela, I. L. Simakowa, T. Salmi and D. Yu. Murzin,
Clarus 580 with MS Clarus SQ 8 S). Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1909.
The results of catalytic reduction of all fermentation media 14 S. Varadarajan and D. J. Miller, Biotechnol. Prog., 1999, 15,
which had undergone partial purication are summarized in 845.
Table 3. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that this 15 M. Dusselier, P. Van Wouwe, A. Dewaele, E. Makshina and
treatment of the broths was sufficient for the effective conver- B. F. Sels, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 1415.
sion of LA into PG. The proposed method of partial purication 16 H. Jang, S.-H. Kim, D. Lee, S. E. Shim, S.-H. Baeck, B. S. Kim
of fermentation broths allows the problematic and expensive and T. S. Chang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2013, 380, 57.
steps of lactic acid purication and byproduct utilization to be 17 Z. Zhang, J. Miller, J. E. Jackson, US Patent 6,403,844 B1,
avoided, which is particularly important for industrial
applications.
2002.
18 Z. Zhang, J. E. Jackson and D. J. Miller, Bioresour. Technol.,
2
008, 99, 5873.
9 R. Datta and M. Henry, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2006,
1, 1119.
1
Conclusions
8
2
2
0 P. Gallezot, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1538.
1 H. Broadbent, G. Campbell, W. Bartley and J. Johanson, J.
Org. Chem., 1959, 24, 1847.
2 T. Y. Jang, K. B. Chung, H. R. Eom, D. K. Noch, I. K. Song,
J. Yi and S. Baeck, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2011, 37, 1275.
3 M. Kitson and P. S. Williams, US Patent 5149680 A, 1992.
4 M. Kitson and P. S. Williams, US Patent 4985572 A, 1991.
5 T. A. Werpy, J. G. Frye Jr, A. H. Zacher and D. J. Miller, US
Patent 6841085 B2, 2005.
6 T. Werpy, J. G. Frye Jr, Y. Wang and A. H. Zacher, US 7186668
B2, 2007.
7 R. P. John, G. S. Anisha, K. M. Nampoothiri and A. Pandey,
Biotechnol. Adv., 2009, 27, 145.
8 M. A. Abdel-Rahman, Y. Tashiro and K. Sonomoto,
J. Biotechnol., 2011, 156, 286.
A new, bio-catalytic method of propylene glycol production
from enzymatic digests of sugar beet pulp enables the replace-
ment of fossil resources with byproducts from food processing.
Appropriate strains of lactic acid bacteria efficiently convert
sugars contained in enzymatic hydrolysates of SBP into lactate,
which is reduced to propylene glycol via heterogenic catalysis.
2
2
2
2
Acknowledgements
2
2
2
2
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the
National Centre for Research and Development, Applied
Research Programme – Project PBS1/B8/3/2012.
Notes and references
9 M. A. Abdel-Rahman, Y. Tashiro and K. Sonomoto,
Biotechnol. Adv., 2013, 31(6), 877.
1
2
J. J. Bozell and G. R. Petersen, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 539.
P. N. R. Vennestrøm, C. M. Osmundsen, C. H. Christensen 30 X. Jiang, Y. Xue, A. Wang, L. Wang, G. Zhang, Q. Zeng, B. Yu
and E. Taarning, Angew. Chem., 2011, 50(45), 10502. and Y. Ma, Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 143, 665.
A. E. Martin and F. H. Murphy, Glycols, Propylene glycols, 31 S. K u¨ hnel, H. A. Schols and H. Gruppen, Biotechnol. Biofuels,
Dow Chemicals, report#117-01785-0306, 2014. 2011, 4, 14.
3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 2299–2304 | 2303