K. Hojo et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 2849–2851
2851
water on both the CLEAR resin and the poly(ethylene
glycol)-grafted Rink amide resin, although the yields
were lower than that of Met-enkephalin amide pre-
pared in organic solvents. We have examined the poten-
tial of the CLEAR resin and the poly(ethylene
glycol)-grafted Rink amide resin for solid-phase synthe-
sis in water, but neither resin swelled sufficiently in
water. Future work should aim to develop a new resin
that swells more than these two resins in water.
References
Figure 1. HPLC profiles of synthetic crude Met-enkephalin
amide synthesized by the solid-phase method in water. A:
Crude Met-enkephalin amide prepared on CLEAR resin. B:
Crude Met-enkephalin amide prepared on the poly(ethylene
glycol)-grafted Rink amide resin. The main peaks at 18 min in
the eluates in both A and B contained Met-enkephalin amide.
Column, DAISOPAK SP-120-5-ODS-B (4.6×250 mm). Flow
rate, 1 ml/min. Eluent, CH CN/H O containing 0.05% TFA.
1. Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149–2154.
2. Hojo, K.; Maeda, M.; Kawasaki, K. J. Peptide Sci. 2001,
7, 615–618.
3. Eckert, H.; Forster, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987,
26, 894–895.
4. Pms-ONp 6: mp. 134°C (decomp.), Tof-MS m/z: 334.2
+
1
(M , C H NO S requires 334.4), H NMR (400 MHz,
16
16
5
CD CN): l 8.30 (2H, d-like, J=9.3 Hz); 7.99 (2H, dd-like,
3
2
3
Gradient: 10/9050/50 (20 min). OD at 220 nm.
J=8.5, 1.2 Hz); 7.85 (1H, tt-like, J=7.4, 1.2 Hz); 7.75
(
2H, dd-like, J=7.4, 8.5 Hz); 7.43 (2H, d-like, J=9.35
thioanisole. After purification by HPLC, the yield of
Met-enkephalin amide prepared on the poly(ethylene
glycol)-grafted Rink amide resin was 32%. The
poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted Rink amide resin swells
better than CLEAR resin in water, which might
account for the slightly higher yield of Met-enkephalin
amide prepared on the poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted
Rink amide resin. The two synthetic Met-enkephalin
amides (prepared on either type of resin) were verified
by comparison with the HPLC of authentic Met-
enkephalin amide prepared by the traditional fluorenyl-
Hz); 4.67 (1H, m); 4.45 (1H, m); 4.04 (1H, m); 3.96 (1H,
24
m); 3.32 (3H, s). Pms-Met-OH 8: [h] −33.6° (c=1.0,
D
+
CH CN), Tof-MS m/z: 344.3 (M , C H NO S requires
3
15 22
4 2
2
4
344.5). Pms-Cys(Acm)-OH 9: [h]
−20.1° (c=1.0,
D
+
CH CN), Tof-MS m/z: 387.5 (M , C H N O S requires
3
16 23
2
5 2
2
4
D
387.5). Pms-Cys(Trt)-OH 10: [h] +7.3° (c=1.0, CH CN),
3
+
Tof-MS m/z: 558.5 (M , C H NO S requires 558.7).
32
32
4 2
24
Met-enkephalin amide: [h]D −6.7° (c=0.8, 20% CH CN/
3
+
H O), Tof-MS m/z: 573.7 [(M+1) , C H N O S requires
2
27 36
6
6
572.7]. Amino acids analysis, Tyr 1.01; Gly 1.00; Phe 0.95;
Met 0.93 (average recovery 94%).
9
methoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) group-based solid-phase
5. Bayer, E.; Rapp, W. In Chemistry of Peptides and
Proteins; V o¨ lter, E.; Bayer, E.; Ovchinikov, Y. A.; Ivanov,
V. T., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, 1986; pp. 3–8.
6. Kempe, M.; Barany, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
method using organic solvents. The yield of Met-
enkephalin amide prepared by the Fmoc group-based
solid-phase method was 76%.
1083–7093.
The new reagent, Pms-ONp, was designed to prepare
Pms-amino acids including sulfur-containing amino
acids. Because the reagent is a crystalline compound
and can be kept stable in a refrigerator, the preparation
of Pms-amino acids is much easier with Pms-ONp than
it is with the former method (route A, Scheme 1).
Met-Enkephalin amide was successfully synthesized in
7. Sheehan, J. C.; Cruickshank, P. A.; Boshrt, G. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1961, 26, 2525–2528.
8. Fujino, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Obayashi, M.; Fukuda, T.;
Shinagawa, S.; Nishimura, O. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1974,
22, 1857–1863.
9. Carpino, L. A.; Han, G. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
5748–5749.