D. Ballivet-Tkatchenko et al. / C. R. Chimie 14 (2011) 780–785
781
importantly transforming an end-product into a valuable
feedstock [1]. Carbon dioxide has been employed for
decades as a raw material for the production of urea,
salicylic acid, and ethylene (propylene) carbonates, as
transesterification of ethylene carbonate which co-pro-
duces ethylene glycol leading to a decrease of the AE value
to 59 wt%. The methanolysis of urea is more favorable (AE =
72 wt%). Moreover, the co-formed ammonia may be
recycled for urea synthesis. It is worthy of note that entries
well as for methanol synthesis from a blend of CO and CO
Recent interest in the use of CO as feedstock is motivated
by the development of new reactions from so-called
renewable carbon. However, CO displays a limited
2
.
2
2
3 and 4 correspond to an indirect use of CO since ethylene
carbonate and urea are thereof industrially produced.
Entry 5 highlights that the direct synthesis of DMC from
2
reactivity when compared to other C1 molecules such
as carbon monoxide and phosgene. Nevertheless, the need
for friendly reactants, products, and safer processes
according to the principles of Green Chemistry and
Engineering [2] offers the opportunity to investigate
CO
of 83 wt%. Interestingly, in the context of non-fossil carbon
resources for making organics coupling methanol with CO
presents the unique advantage of utilizing CO as carbon
feedstock, provided that methanol is thereof obtained by
hydrogenation [11].
2
and methanol leads, as entry 2, to the highest AE factor
2
2
2
new reaction pathways based on CO .
The alternative to phosgene is a challenging option that
may open new perspectives for carbonate and carbamate
synthesis including polymers [3]. The phosgene technolo-
gy has still a leading role in a range of industries, including
production of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and others
that raises obvious technical and economical barriers.
Phosgene is widely recognized as one of the most acutely
toxic substances used in commerce today. It is currently
produced from brine and CO in a two-step process:
2
The key role played by DMC and CO in the practice of
green chemistry has stimulated fundamental research
for developing innovative catalytic methodologies.
Progress in this field has been slow, however, mainly
2
due to the low reactivity of CO . The current main issue
for the reaction reported in entry 5 of Table 1 is to
enhance the yield and rate for DMC formation. One
option consists in adding water traps to the catalytic
systems for preventing catalyst deactivation by water as
well as to shifting the equilibrium [12]. Nevertheless,
there is a need for exploring new catalysts for rate
enhancement in the absence of water trap additives. In
recent years, a variety of heterogeneous catalysts has
been screened. The reaction is commonly run under high
electrolysis of brine for forming Cl
which is further reacted with CO on activated charcoal
catalyst leading to COCl [4]. In the case study of organic
2
(chlor-alkali process)
2
carbonate synthesis, the reaction co-produces HCl. Thus,
-
-
the chlorine cycle Cl ! Cl
2
! Cl is, overall, energy-
intensive. Phosgene-free production of DMC is mainly
based on the oxidative carbonylation of methanol which
limits scale-up due to inherent hazards [5]. Nevertheless,
much attention is being focused on extending DMC uses as
intermediate, e.g. in organic synthesis [6], phosgene-free
synthesis of polymers [7], and gasoline blending [8]. As a
matter of fact, DMC fulfils green chemistry criteria [2]. It
has a low toxicity, an absence of any irritant or mutagenic
effects and low atmospheric loss, and is highly biodegrad-
able [7,9]. Therefore, there is a real need for friendly
synthetic routes to DMC.
pressure, i.e. 100–300 bar, at 130–180 8C over ZrO
2
-
based catalysts [13], CeO [14], Cu-Ni/graphite [15], V-
2
doped Cu–Ni/AC catalysts [16], and polyoxometalates
[17]. Zirconia-based catalysts are those exhibiting the
highest selectivity to DMC (ꢀ100%). Interestingly,
organometallic complexes such as diorganotin (IV)
compounds are also active precursors under the same
reaction conditions. Importantly enough, they are
superior to heterogeneous catalysts in terms of atom
economy since they are totally selective [12(b),18].
However, organometallic tin compounds in general
suffer from environmental pressure due to issues around
tributyltin derivatives.
Table 1 reports the various alternative feedstocks
of current interest to get DMC. The atom economy factor
(
AE) is also given as a helpful indicator of the amount
As part of our ongoing research on tin compounds for
of co-produced waste to assess the greenness of a
reaction [10].
the synthesis of DMC from methanol and CO
report preliminary results on the catalytic behavior of
supported SnO catalysts for comparison with unsupport-
ed SnO and diorganotin (IV) compounds. The synthesis of
unsupported SnO was achieved by a free-chloride sol–gel
route from tin tetra-tert-butoxide precursor providing
SnO nanoparticles with an average diameter of 4 nm [19].
Supported SnO was prepared from the same tin precursor
2
, we herein
The conventional phosgene route (entry 1) gives an AE
factor of 55 wt% which shows that nearly half the weight of
the reactants is transformed into hydrogen chloride. A
much more favorable factor (83 wt%) is obtained from the
on-stream oxidative carbonylation of methanol with the
co-formation of water (entry 2). Entry 3 corresponds to the
2
2
2
2
2
with the objective to avoid handling nanoparticles. A
preliminary screening with alumina, silica-alumina, and
silica as supports showed that silica was the best candidate
due to its inertness towards methanol dehydration and
Table 1
The different feedstocks to DMC, and the corresponding atom economy
factor (AE).
2
DMC decomposition. ZrO catalysts were also prepared
Entry
Feedstock
COCl + 2 CH
Product
AE (wt%)
following identical methods to get a reference under our
reaction conditions since they are known to be the most
selective to DMC among the heterogeneous catalysts
reported so far [13]. The synthesis of the silica-supported
tin and zirconium oxides is also reported as there is no
previous report.
1
2
3
4
5
2
3
OH
DMC + 2 HCl
55
83
59
72
83
CO + 1/2 O + 2 CH
(CH O) CO + 2 CH OH
(NH CO + 2 CH OH
CO + 2 CH OH
2
3
OH
DMC + H
DMC + HO(CH
DMC + 2 NH
DMC + H
2
O
2
2
3
2 2
) OH
)
3 2
3
3
2
3
2
O