8
26
R S Yalgudre and G S Gokavi
5. Lunn G, Philips L R and Pacula-Cox C 1998 J.
1
.34 V, respectively. The conversion of HOBr into Br
2
−
Chromatogr. B 708 217
is thermodynamically more favourable than into Br .
But the generation of bromine requires two moles of
HOBr whose concentration is very small in the reac-
tion mixture. Further, the rate constant of direct oxi-
dation of bromide in acidic solutions by bromate is
3
requires excess of [Br ]. Therefore, in the proposed
mechanism (scheme 1) Br is considered as the prod-
uct rather than Br . The decrease in relative permittiv-
6
. Gad A M, El-Dissouky A, Mansour E M and
El-Maghraby A 2000 Polym. Degrad. Stab. 68 153
. Gursoy A, Terzioglu N and Otuk G 1997 Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 32 753
7
3
6
8. Singh B, Shrivastava R and Narang K K 2000 Synth.
React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 30 1175
9. Priewisch B and Ruck-Brown K 2005 J. Org. Chem. 70
2350
−3
3
−1 −1
−
.94 × 10 dm mol
s
indicating its slowness and
−
1
0. Nguyen T M, Guzei I A and Lee D 2002 J. Org. Chem.
2
67 6553
ity of the reaction medium with increase in acetic acid
content increases the rate of reaction and the plot of log
kobs against (1/D), where D is the dielectric constant of
the medium, is linear (figure 2) with a negative slope.
The charge separation in the transition state formed and
its larger size increases its stability37 in the medium of
1
1. Kariyone K and Yazawa H 1970 Tetrahedron Lett. 11
2885
12. Chen J, Ling G and Lu S 2003 Tetrahedron 59 8251
13. Goswami S P and Maity A C 2007 Chem. Lett. 36 1118
14. Goswami S P and Adak A K 2003 Synth. Commun. 33
475
15. Madec D and Ferezou J P 1996 Synlett. 867
higher relative permittivity thus, increasing the rate of 16. Sosnovsky G and Krogh J A 1978 Synthesis 703
reaction with increase in acetic acid content.
17. Gates B, Yin Y and Xia Y 2000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122
2582
1
1
8. Kulkarni P P, Kadam A J, Desai U V, Mane R B and
Wadgaonkar P P 2000 J. Chem. Res. (S) 184
9. Jadhav V K, Wadgaonkar P P and Salunkhe M M 1998
J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 45 831
5
. Conclusions
1
The reaction between KBrO and acetic acid hydrazide
in the presence of selenium(IV) as a catalyst occurs
3
20. Kadam S D, Supale A R and Gokavi G S 2008 Z. Phys.
Chem. 222 635
through formation of a complex between catalyst and 21. Shewale S A, Phadkule A N and Gokavi G S 2008 Int.
J. Chem. Kinetics 40 151
2. Farkas L, Perlmutter B and Schachter O 1949 J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 71 2833
hydrazide which will be oxidized by the oxidant in a
2
rate determining step. The mechanism proposed on the
basis of kinetic data does not involve any free radi-
cal intervention and corresponding acetic acid as the
2
3. Farkas L and Schachter O 1949 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71
2827
product. The active species in the present study are the 24. Mirjalili B F, Zolfigol M A, Bamoniri A, Zaghaghi Z and
Hazar A 2003 Acta Chim. Slov. 50 563
5. Tomioka H, Oshima K and Nozaki H 1982 Tetrahedron
protonated forms of the hydrazide and H SeO of cat-
alyst. The dependence of rate of reaction on hydro-
2
3
2
2
2
2
Lett. 23 539
gen ion concentration of the order of two is due to the
6. Yamamoto Y, Suzuki H and Moro-oka Y 1985 Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 26 2107
7. Lurie Ju 1971 Handbook of analytical chemistry
+
successive protonation of bromate to H BrO species.
2
3
(Moscow: MIR Publishers)
Acknowledgement
8. Mohammad A 2003 Transition Met. Chem. 28 345
One of the authors RSY acknowledges the University 29. Thomson R C 1971 Inorg. Chem. 10 1892
3
3
3
3
0. Manoussakis G, Haristos D and Youri C 1973 Can. J.
Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi for the award
of Teacher Fellowship under FIP- UGC-XI plan.
Chem. 51 811
1. Lindegren R and Niemann C 1949 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71
1
504
2. Reddy C S and Manjari P S 2010 Indian J. Chem. 49A
18
References
4
3. Cortes C E S and Faria R B 2001 J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 12
1
. Kocevar M, Mihorko P and Polanc S 1995 J. Org. Chem.
0 1466
. Gudasi K B, Patil M S, Vadavi R S, Shenoy R V, Patil
775
6
34. Amos R I J, Gourlay B S, Schiesser C H, Smith J A and
2
Yates B F 2008 Chem. Commun. 1695
S A, and Nethaji M 2007 Spectrochim Acta. Part A 67 35. Coleman W C and McCrosky C R 1937 Ind. Eng. Chem,
72 Anal. Ed 9 1458
. Zubareva G I, Adeev S U, Radushev A V, Gomzikov A I 36. Domínguez A and Iglesias E 1998 Langmuir 14 2677
1
3
4
and Zubarev M P 1998 Z. Prikladnoi Khimii 71(2) 271
. Shen X and Giese R W 1997 J. Chromatogr. A 777 261
37. Amis E S 1966 Solvent effects on the reaction and
mechanism (New York: Academic Press)