C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
this is a clear demonstration that the activation of the C-C bond
of acetonitrile is due to the favorable formation of a stable cyanide
bridged dinuclear copper(II) cryptate. This mechanism is different
from those reported involving η1- or η2-nitrile intermediates.10,12,13
Currently, we are investigating the C-C bond activation of other
alkyl and aryl cyanides by 1. Preliminary results indicate that 1
can also cleave the C-C bond of benzonitrile at room temperature
to produce phenol and the cyanide bridged complex [Cu2L(CN)]-
(ClO4)3:
Figure 3. Possible cleavage mechanism.
1 day, the absorption spectrum is similar to that of pure 2, indicating
that complex 1 reacted completely to form complex 2. After that,
the absorption spectra did not change with further standing.
Formation of the cyanide bridged dinuclear copper complex in
acetonitrile was also confirmed by ESI-MS spectroscopy on a
Thermo Finigan LCQDECA XP ion trap mass spectrometer (see
Supporting Information S1). Initially, an acetonitrile solution of 1
shows three peaks due to [Cu2L]3+, [Cu2L]2+, and [Cu2L (ClO4)]+.
After the solution was heated at 50 °C in a sealed tube for 1 day,
the above three peaks are not observed, and three new signals
attributed to [Cu2L(CN)]3+, [Cu2L(CN)]+, and [HL]+ are observed.
The appearance of [HL]+ is probably due to the reduction of Cu-
(II) to copper metal during the ionization process.
The cleavage reaction involves the C-C bond activation of
acetonitrile, and we employed GC (Varian CP3800) spectra to
investigate the new species formed in acetonitrile solution. The
results (see Supporting Information S2) indicate that methanol is
formed when an acetonitrile solution of 1 was left at room
temperature in a sealed tube for 1 day. This experiment demonstrates
that methanol is produced during the cleavage reaction of 1 with
acetonitrile.
On the basis of the above experimental results, a likely cleavage
mechanism is presented in Figure 3. In this process, the nitrogen
atom of acetonitrile binds to one Cu(II) atom through its electron
pair, and the other Cu(II) atom interacts with the filled π orbital of
the sp-hybridized acetonitrile carbon, resulting in electron flow from
the π bond to the Cu(II) atom, and this increases the “leaving
ability” of cyanide and the electrophilicity of the methyl carbon,
and results in cleavage by water to form methanol and cyanide
bridged complex 2.
The cleavage rate is determined spectrophotometrically at λ )
890 nm and 20 °C (see Supporting Information S3). In the presence
of excess acetonitrile, the rate law can be described as dCA/dt )
-kobsdCA, where CA is the concentration of 1, and kobsd ) k2[H2O]R.
At the lower concentration of water (0.167 M), the plot of -ln CA
versus time reveals a line in the 0-90 min time range whose slope
(k) is equal to 1.52 × 10-4 s-1 (t1/2 ) 76 min). After 90 min, the
plot shows curvature. The reaction rates become larger along with
the increasing concentrations of water, and the plots show a straight
line with no curvature over 3 half-lives. These experiments clearly
indicate the first-order dependence on water. The calculated second-
order rate constant (k2) and R value are 1.76(1) × 10-4 M-1 s-1
and 0.084(2), respectively.
[Cu2L]4+ + PhCN + H2O f [Cu2L(CN)]3+ + PhOH + H+
Here, the cleavage rate for benzonitrile is much faster than that for
acetonitrile as the cleavage reaction appears instantaneous upon
mixing 1 and benzonitrile as assessed by ESI-MS spectra.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by NSFC
(20371051, 20131020), the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science
Foundation, and the Education Department of Guangdong Province.
We thank Rudy L. Luck for assistance with corrections and Dian
Chen for assistance with ligand synthesis.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characterization
of compounds 1 and 2, the crystallographic data for complex 2 (CIF),
ESI-MS, GC, and kinetics data for complex 1 (PDF). This material is
References
(1) Lehn, J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 89.
(2) Dietrich, B.; Guilhem, J.; Lehn, J.-M.; Pascard, C.; Sonveaux, E. HelV.
Chim. Acta 1984, 67, 91.
(3) Coughlin, P. K.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3228.
(4) Harding, C. J.; McKee, V.; Nelson, J.; Lu, Q. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 1768.
(5) Menif, R.; Reibenspies, J.; Martell, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3446.
(6) Harding, C. J.; Mabbs, F. E.; MacInnes, E. J. L.; McKee, V.; Nelson, J.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 3227.
(7) Escuer, A.; Harding, J. H.; Dussart, Y.; Nelson, J.; Mckee, V.; Vicente,
R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 223.
(8) Pierre, J.-L.; Chautemps, P.; Refaif, S.; Beguin, C.; Marzouki, A. E.;
Serratrice, G.; Saint-Aman, E.; Rey, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
1965.
(9) Warzeska, S.; Kra¨mer, R. Chem. Commun. 1996, 499. Ahlers, B.;
Cammann, K.; Warzeska, S.; Kra¨mer, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 2141.
(10) Taw, F. L.; Mueller, A. H.; Bergman, R. G.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 9808. Taw, F. L.; White, P. S.; Bergman, R. G.; Brookhart,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4192.
(11) Breslow, R.; Fairweather, R.; Keana, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2135.
Komiya, S.; Suzuki, S.; Watanabe, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44,
1440. Buckingham, D. A.; Foxman, B. M.; Sargeson, A. M.; Zanella, A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6104. Buckingham, D. A.; Keene, F. R.;
Sargeson, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5649. Buckingham, D. A.;
Morris, P.; Sargeson, A. M.; Zanella, A. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 1910.
(12) Churchill, D.; Shin, J. H.; Hascall, T.; Hahn, J. M.; Bridgewater, B. M.;
Parkin, G. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2403.
(13) Garcia, J. J.; Brunkan, N. M.; Jones, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
9547.
(14) See Supporting Information for preparation details.
(15) See Supporting Information.
(16) (a) Parker, R. J.; Spiccia, L.; Moubaraki, B.; Muray, K. S.; Skelton, B.
W.; White, A. H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 300, 922. (b) Scott, M. J.;
Lee, S. C.; Holm, R. H. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 4651. (c) Jungst, R.;
Stucky, G. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2404.
(17) Hathaway, B. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1972, 1196.
Under similar reaction conditions, there is no reaction between
[Cu(tren)](ClO4)2 and acetonitrile (see Supporting Information S4);
JA031874Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 15, 2004 4761