frequencies for CaY, SrY and BaY, and a higher frequency
for MgY which also contains Mg(OH)x species.
rates for BaY < MgY < SrY < CaY. The observed lower acet-
one growth rate for MgY, not expected based on its higher
electrostatic field, can be explained by a higher hydrolysis
degree of the cations, resulting in a lower amount of available
Mg2+ ions. Based on the FTIR data, water and isopropylhy-
droperoxide are adsorbed on or close to the cations in the
zeolite, while acetone adsorbs on Brønsted acid sites, pointing
to a two-step mechanism in which different active sites are
involved. Moreover, surface reaction activity and selectivity
(towards hydroperoxide or acetone) are determined by the
presence of bare divalent cations as well as the number of
Brønsted acid sites.
4. Reaction mechanism
It has been proposed that the high mobility of alkane and oxy-
gen in zeolites allows easy access to poorly shielded cation
sites, resulting in spontaneous formation of an intermolecular
charge-transfer complex, stabilized by parallel orientation to
the electrostatic field, resulting in alkane radical cation and
ꢀ
O2 formation.6,7,11 After proton transfer from the hydrocar-
bon radical cation to the superoxide,13 radical recombination
is easily reached to form isopropylhydroperoxide, which is also
observed as intermediate in our reaction. Thermal rearrange-
ment of isopropylhydroperoxide to acetone and water is
well-established8 resulting in the overall reaction:
References
CH3CH2CH3 þ O2 ! CH3CðOOHÞHCH3
! CH3COCH3 þ H2O
1
G. Centi, F. Cavani and F. Trifiro, Selective oxidation by hetero-
geneous catalysis, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New
York, 2000.
Hydroperoxide decomposition has been reported to be
strongly accelerated in acid (HCl) treated NaY for cyclohexane
photo-oxidation to cyclohexanone.9 Also, thermal rearrange-
ment of cyclohexylhydroperoxide to cyclohexanone and water
is an established intramolecular heterolytic reaction in acidic
solution.32 In the present study, the relative ratio between
isopropylhydroperoxide and acetone decreased according to
BaY > SrY > CaY > MgY (Fig. 7). On the other hand, the
Brønsted acidity increases for BaY < SrY < CaY < MgY
(Fig. 1). The different adsorption sites of isopropylhydroperox-
ide and acetone, as discussed above, suggest that the formation
of hydroperoxide and its decomposition occurred at different
active sites. The cation site directs the reaction to isopropylhy-
droperoxide while the Brønsted acid sites are involved in the
decomposition into acetone and water (Scheme 1). Additional
evidence for this reaction scheme can be found in the acetone
production curve of BaY (inset Fig. 5a). The acetone produc-
tion on BaY accelerated with reaction time, which might be
attributed to creation of acid sites due to hydrolysis of pro-
duced water, in agreement with the high acetone to water ratio
observed for BaY. Due to the very low concentration of pro-
duced water, quantification of hydrolysis level from the spec-
trum is difficult. It is not yet clear whether the cation and
Brønsted acid sites act independently in the reaction or that
a cooperation of both sites is needed, this is presently being
investigated.
2
G. Centi, V. C. Corberan, S. Perathoner and P. Ruiz, Catal.
Today, 2000, 61, 1.
3
4
5
6
G. Centi and M. Misono, Catal. Today, 1998, 41, 287–296.
J. E. Lyons and G. W. Parshall, Catal. Today, 1994, 22, 313–333.
C. B. Dartt and M. E. Davis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1994, 33, 2887.
F. Blatter, H. Sun, S. Vasenkov and H. Frei, Catal. Today, 1998,
41, 297–309.
H. Frei, 3Rd World Congress on Oxidation Catalysis, 1997, 110,
1041–1050.
H. Sun, F. Blatter and H. Frei, Catal. Lett., 1997, 44, 247–253.
H. Sun, F. Blatter and H. Frei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
6873–6879.
7
8
9
10 F. Blatter, H. Sun and H. Frei, Chem. Eur. J., 1996, 2, 385–389.
11 H. Sun, F. Blatter and H. Frei, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996,
211, 3-ORGN.
12 D. L. Vanoppen, D. E. DeVos and P. A. Jacobs, Prog. Zeolite
Microporous Mater., Pts A–C, 1997, 105, 1045–1051.
13 R. G. Larsen, A. C. Saladino, T. A. Hunt, J. E. Mann, M. Xu,
V. H. Grassian and S. C. Larsen, J. Catal., 2001, 204, 440–449.
14 J. W. Ward, J. Phys. Chem., 1968, 72, 4211–4223.
15 D. W. Breck Zeolite molecular sieves: structure, chemistry, and use,
Wiley, New York, 1974.
16 J. B. Uytterhoeven and R. Schoonheydt, J. Catal., 1969, 13,
425–434.
17 J. W. Ward, J. Catal., 1967, 9, 225–236.
18 J. W. Ward, J. Catal., 1968, 10, 34–46.
19 J. E. Sponer and Z. Sobalik, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105,
8285–8290.
20 K. M. Gough and W. F. Murphy, J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 87,
3332–3340.
21 K. T. Geodokyan and A. V. Kiselev, J. Phys. Chem., 1967, 41,
227,476.
22 H. van Bekkum, Introduction to zeolite science and practice,
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001.
Conclusion
23 H. Guenther, NMR spectroscopy: basic principles, concepts, and
applications in chemistry, 2nd edn., Chichester, Wiley, 1995.
24 B. Smit, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 5597–5603.
25 J. Janchen and W. J. Mortier, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 12 489–
12 493.
This study shows that propane can be oxidized to acetone, via
isopropylhydroperoxide, at room temperature with increasing
26 D. Barthomeuf, Catal. Rev. Sci.—Eng., 1996, 38, 521–613.
27 D. L. Vanoppen, D. E. De Vos and P. A. Jacobs, J. Catal., 1998,
177, 22–28.
28 S. Bhatia, Zeolite catalysis: principles and applications, CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FA, 1990.
29 L. Bertsch and H. W. Habgood, J. Phys. Chem., 1963, 67,
1621.
30 A. Panov and J. J. Fripiat, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 3788–3796.
31 A. Panov and J. J. Fripiat, J. Catal., 1998, 178, 188–197.
32 R. A. Sheldon, The chemistry of functional groups, peroxides,
Wiley, New York, 1983.
33 W. J. Mortier, J. Catal., 1978, 55, 138–145.
34 R. T. Sanderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 2259–2261.
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism for propane selective oxidation.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 4407–4413
4413