P90
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 158 (7) P87-P92 (2011)
O2 þ 2H2O þ 4eꢀ ! 4OHꢀð0:401 V vs NHEÞ
[12]
We limited experiments to the case of CPh as a test substrate
since NPh could undergo reduction reactions at the cathode, making
a comparison with other methods difficult. Experiments were con-
ducted in buffer phosphate (pH 7.2) and buffer borate þ 1 M
NH4PF6 (pH 9). The choice was dictated by the necessity to maxi-
mize the amount of O3 formation and for this purpose the solution
in the anode compartment was also added with NaF and kept at a
temperature of 0ꢁC. Current efficiencies for ozone formation at a
current of 50 mA cmꢀ2 were 8–10% in buffer phosphate and 10–
12% in buffer borate.
The results for the advanced oxidation of CPh by cathodically
activated O2/O3 are shown in Fig. 6 (curves 4, 5) and compared, in
the same figure, with the data discussed in the previous sections
obtained with the external cell O3 approach (curves 2, 3) and direct
electrolysis (curve 1). The comparison is done in the pH range from
6.5 to 9 where the stability of H2O2 in the presence of O3 decreases
with increasing pH (Ref. 42) and even a relatively low concentration
of hydrogen peroxide can cause formation of a high concentration
of OH radicals through reaction with ozone.39
It is clear that the O2/O3 cathodic activation AO method always
offers the best results. We observed that the methods based on the
use of O3 generally feature an improved degradation of the organic
substrate as pH increases from neutral to weakly alkaline media. As
discussed above, this is due to reaction of the phenolate XROꢀ
directly with O3 and/or indirectly with OH radicals (Reactions 6–8).
Additionally, we have proposed earlier6 that in the neutral or weakly
alkaline pH range (7–9) reaction of O3 with hydrogen peroxide
is expected, contrary to experience, to be favored over the two-
electrons route
O2 þ H2O þ 2eꢀ ! HO2 ꢀþOHꢀðꢀ0:0649 V vs NHEÞ
[13]
Likewise the electrochemical reduction of O3 should be favored
over that of O2, and the direct reduction of O3 to ꢂO3ꢀ should play a
key role in the mechanism.7 The cited authors favor a debatable
mechanism in which O2 reduction and the consequent hydrogen per-
oxide formation has no role. Formation of H2O2 from O2, predomi-
nantly present in the O2/O3 mixture, is seemingly not considered in
other published work.47 It seems therefore appropriate to discuss
these issues in some detail.
In our experiments, the potential of the graphite cathode reached
values between ꢀ 0.9 and ꢀ 1.0 V when the PbO2 anode worked
under conditions of O3 generation, i.e., typically at 2.0 to 2.1 V, and
thus reduction of O2 needs to be considered and discussed. Indeed,
an ample literature has much to recommend consideration of the
role played by O2 reduction in the system described herein (Reac-
tion 12 and 13). In particular, it has long been established that on
some electrode materials, including graphite, O2 reduction follows a
two-electron route yielding hydrogen peroxide.48–51 However, in
order to collect additional data that can buttress conclusions on the
reduction processes involved, we performed the experiments
described in the following.
Ozone is a rather small fraction of the total gas evolved at the an-
ode, i.e., typically 18 mg lꢀ1 or ꢄ 1% v/v (STP) in the present case.
Then with pure O2 bubbling, under otherwise identical operative
conditions as with O2/O3, analysis of the catholite during 20 min
showed that hydrogen peroxide is produced at an average rate of 4
mg lꢀ1 minꢀ1. For a comparison, in the experiment with O2/O3 and
18 mg lꢀ1 O3 in the gas phase, the amount of dissolved ozone was
about 4 mg lꢀ1 at 20ꢁC in agreement with the value calculated
according to literature.52 As a consequence, at steady state condi-
O3 þ HOꢀ2 ! ꢂOH þ Oꢀ2 þ O2
[11]
contributes significantly to creating a highly oxidizing environment
leading to degradation of the organic pollutants. Reaction 11 can
occur in addition to or instead of the above mentioned Reactions
6–8; the rate constant for Reaction 12 (2.8 ꢃ 106 Mꢀ1 sꢀ1) is several
orders of magnitude higher than those of Reactions 6–8.46
In a recent paper, Kishimoto et al.7 have questioned the possible
involvement of hydrogen peroxide on the ground that, “a cathodic
reaction with higher standard potential generally occurs prior to
reactions with lower potential”. Accordingly, the four-electrons
reduction of oxygen, e.g., in alkaline solutions
ꢀ
tions, ozone can react with an excess HO2 according to fast Reac-
tion 12 giving rise to a highly oxidizing environment.
We verified that the reaction of O3 with peroxide is indeed fast
in an experiment in which a stream of O2/O3 generated, this time,
by arc discharge (80 mg lꢀ1 O3 at 70 ml minꢀ1) was fluxed for 2
min through a 3 ml of 8 mM H2O2 at pH 9. We observed a decrease
of the peroxide concentration by over an order of magnitude, and no
dissolved ozone was measured. For prolonged experiments (t > 4
min), the concentration of ozone dissolved in water increased again
and reached 17 mg lꢀ1, i.e., the value measured in an analogous
experiment with no added H2O2.
In a further searching experiment, a gaseous mixture of O2/O3
was again generated by the discharge method and bubbled into the
cathode compartment of an electrochemical cell until the measured
concentration of ozone in solution was constant. The measured
amount of O3 in the gas phase was 20 mg lꢀ1
.
Curve a in Fig. 7 is the reduction of O2/O3 at the graphite cath-
ode in pre-saturated solutions and curve b in the same figure refers
to an analogous experiment but in a pure O2 saturated electrolyte.
Comparison of the data reveals that at potentials more negative of
ꢀ 0.25 V the current is essentially due to O2 reduction; some differ-
ence in the current can be attributed to a difference in gas flux, and
it is clear that reduction currents clearly attributable to O3 are
observed at potentials more positive than ꢀ 0.2 V only.
To sum up the discussion on the nature of active oxygen species,
a predominant role of O2 reduction appears reasonable in view of
the fact that ozone represent typically 1–2% v/v of the gas evolved
at the anode, and even considering that its reported solubility in
water is 10 times higher than that of O2, the overall contribution as
electroactive species should be small, taking into account also that
its two-electron reduction
Figure 6. Comparison of different methods for the oxidation of 1.25 mM
4-chlorophenol using b-PbO2 electrodes in neutral or weakly alkaline media
at 25ꢁC: (1) direct electrolysis at pH 7.2 (phosphate buffer); (2) ozone-
mediated ex-situ method, in water at pH 6.5; (3) ozone-mediated ex-situ
method, in water at pH 9 (borate buffer); (4) cathodic O2/O3 approach at pH
7.2 (phosphate buffer); (5) cathodic O2/O3 approach at pH 9 (borate buffer).
See text for full explanation.
O3 þ H2O þ 2eꢀ ! 2OHꢀ þ O2
[14]
Downloaded on 2014-11-28 to IP 169.230.243.252 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).