C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
We finally investigated the structure of the metallized DNA using
9
AFM. Nonmodified DNA gave under our conditions no metal
deposition, in line with the gel electrophoresis results. Sugar-
modified DNA, however, exhibited Ag(0) deposition after limited
exposure to the Tollens reagent and a subsequent development
process, therefore proving that Ag(0) deposition is indeed localized
along the sugar (aldehyde)-modified DNA. Further confirmation
of the Ag(0)-templating properties of sugar-modified DNA was
demonstrated by an increase in DNA diameter as a function of the
development time.
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient and selective
method for the deposition of Ag(0) around aldehyde-modified DNA.
The modification involves incorporation of acetylene-containing
nucleotide triphosphates using DNA polymerases followed by a
click reaction that can be efficiently performed directly on a
polyacrylamide gel. Using this method, Ag(0) deposition can be
confined only to the modified DNA. The ability to insert the
acetylene labels enzymatically offers the possibility to exploit the
arsenal of molecular biological tools in order to construct conductive
DNA nanodevices. Experiments to ascertain whether these metal-
lized DNA constructs conduct electricity are currently underway.
Figure 3. PCR assays (Pwo pol.) of the polη gene from yeast (318 bp).
a) Lanes 1 and 5: DNA ladder (NEB 2-log; 0.1-10.0 kb). Lane 2: Positive
(
control (using dTTP). Lane 3: PCR using 1. Lane 4: PCR using 2. (b)
PCR assay incorporating triphosphate 2 [lane 1, 7.0 ng; lane 3, 3.5 ng DNA
loadings] and dTTP [lane 2, 7.0 ng; lane 4, 3.5 ng DNA loadings]. Gel A
corresponds to treatment with a Tollens solution followed by development,
whereas gel B corresponds to treatment with the fluorescent stain SYBR
Green II.
set of triphosphates provided the correct base sequence, reflecting
the high fidelity of the polymerases when incorporating 1 or 2.9
We then investigated the compatibility and efficiency of the click
reaction between acetylene-modified DNA prepared using 1 and 2
and the galactose azide 3, containing the aldehyde as a pro-
tected hemiacetal. Clicking onto synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleo-
tides (ODNs) comprising one or several consecutive alkyne-modi-
fied nucleosides 1 revealed incomplete conversion by MALDI-
Acknowledgment. We thank the VW Foundation, the DFG,
and the BASF AG (Ludwigshafen) for generous financial support.
J.G. thanks the Fonds of the Chemical Industry. G.A.B. thanks the
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
9
TOF. This is most likely attributed to the steric shielding of the
acetylene by the DNA backbone. In contrast, the yield of click
product of ODN’s comprising the more flexible alkyne with azide
3
was always quantitative even in ODN examples incorporating
Supporting Information Available: Information concerning the
preparation of 1 and 2, the PCR assays, the enzymatic digest of modified
PCR fragments, “on the gel” and ODN clicking efficiency and Ag
deposition procedures. This material is available free of charge via the
Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
the nucleoside 2 in six consecutive positions.
We then investigated whether the Ag deposition process can be
directed to just aldehyde-modified DNA. To this end, nonacetylene-
modified DNA (318 nucleobases) and its DNA cognate prepared
with either 1 or 2 were loaded onto a 5% TBE-urea polyacrylamide
gel (Figure 3b). The click reaction was then performed directly on
the gel by agitation of the DNA-containing gel in a 1:1 MeOH:
References
(1) Seeman, N. C. Nature 2003, 421, 427-431.
H
2
O solution comprising 3, CuSO
TCEP or sodium ascorbate). Washing the gel with an aqueous
Ag(NH OH solution (Tollens reagent) and subsequent develop-
4
, and a reducing agent (e.g.,
(
2) (a) Braun, E.; Eichen, Y.; Sivan, U.; Ben-Yoseph, G. Nature 1998, 391,
7
75-778. (b) Keren, K.; Krueger, M.; Gilad, R.; Ben-Yoseph, G.; Sivan,
3
)
2
U.; Braun, E. Science 2002, 297, 72-75. (c) Keren, K.; Berman, R. S.;
Buchstab, E.; Sivan, U.; Braun, E. Science 2003, 302, 1380-1382. (d)
Deng, Z. X.; Mao, C. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4068-4070.
ment of the Ag(0) nuclei with a typical developer solution (citric
acid and formaldehyde) furnished, only in the case of the aldehyde-
modified DNA strands, yellow/brown spots on the gel, indicative
of Ag deposition (Figure 3b, Gel A). The whole process of the
Tollens reaction and development is performed in just 30 and 3
min, respectively. To prove that the unmodified DNA is indeed
present on the gel, we repeated the experiment but now treated the
gel with SYBR Green II (Figure 3b, Gel B). This time, both
aldehyde-modified and natural DNA bands were observed. The click
reaction followed by Ag deposition is highly efficient because the
(
e) Yan, H.; Park, S. H.; Finkelstein, G.; Reif, J. H.; LaBean, T. H. Science
2
003, 301, 1882-1884. (f) Keren, K.; Berman, R. S.; Braun, E. Nano
Lett. 2004, 4, 323-326.
(
3) Chworos, A.; Severcan, I.; Koyfman, A. Y.; Weinkam, P.; Oroudjev, E.;
Hansma, H. G.; Jaeger, L. Science 2004, 306, 2068-2072.
(4) (a) Richter, J.; Seidel, R.; Kirsch, R.; Mertig, M.; Pompe, W.; Plaschke,
J.; Schackert, H. K. AdV. Mater. 2000, 12, 507. (b) Mertig, M.; Ciacchi,
L. C.; Seidel, R.; Pompe, W.; De Vita, A. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 841-844.
(c) Monson, C. F.; Woolley, A. T. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 359-363.
(5) Berti, L.; Alessandrini, A.; Facci, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11216-
1217.
1
(
6) (a) Sakthivel, K.; Barbas, C. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2872-
875. (b) Held, H. A.; Benner, S. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3857-
3869. (c) Jaeger, S.; Famulok, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3337-
340.
galactose-modified 318-mer DNA was detectable by eye down to
1
2
9
.3 ng. The click reaction using 1-modified DNA is less efficient,
3
in agreement with the data from the small oligonucleotides, as
indicated by the lower detection sensitivity of only 3.5 ng. When
the aldehyde density on the DNA was significantly increased, by
the use of azide containing dendrimers 4 and 5, the detection limit
of 2-modified DNA was reduced to 0.9 and 0.5 ng, respectively,
indicative of an increase in the amount of Ag(0) deposition around
the modified DNA
(7) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596-2598.
(
8) (a) Johnson, R. E.; Prakash, S.; Prakash, L. Science 1999, 283, 1001-
1004. (b) Hubscher, U.; Maga, G.; Spadari, S. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2002,
71, 133-163.
(9) For further details, please consult the Supporting Information.
JA055517V
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 5, 2006 1399