Chemistry Letters Vol.36, No.1 (2007)
155
constant surrounding the silver nanoparticles owing to deposi-
tion of copper nanoparticles onto the surface of the silver nano-
particles. The absorbance at 407 nm was damped by 45% in spite
of the presence of Cu/Ag nanoparticles found by 17% in the
HRTEM image of Figure 1b. The change of the plasmon absorp-
tion seemed complicated and could not be simply explained.
Dash dot line in Figure 2 shows the UV–vis spectrum of the
sample S3. The absorption at 400 nm was damped. Furthermore,
the back ground rose up in the all region caused by scattering
of probe light for measuring the UV–vis spectrum, suggesting
the formation of large particles due to the aggregation.
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
200
400
600
800
1000
Wavelength / nm
Figure 2. UV–vis spectra of the samples. Silver myristate
was heated for 5 min at 413 K in 1-heptanol (solid line). Copper
myristate was added into silver nanoparticles solution and
then heated for 5 min (dash line) and 10 min (dash dot line).
The sample of silver was diluted by twentieth with hexane.
In conclusion, we have succeeded in preparing Ag core–Cu
shell nanoparticles by an MW-assisted alcohol reduction process
in a short period of time. MW-heating is advantageous for this
process due to its rapid heating mode.
(Figure 1a, inset). This result agreed with a result of Wada
et al.12 showing preparation of silver nanoparticles having
5 nm in size.
An HRTEM image of the sample S2 is shown in Figure 1b.
Nanoparticles having 10–40 nm in size were observed. Figure 1c
shows a magnified image of the particles in Figure 1b. A particle
having 5 nm was observed with a strong contrast inside the par-
ticle having 15 nm in size. Thickness of the shell was 5 nm. This
inside nanoparticle should be a silver nanoparticle having 5 nm
in size because this diameter of the silver nanoparticles was
close to those observed in Figure 1a. Furthermore, the shell
surrounding the silver nanoparticle should be copper because
of lighter contrast than the contrast of the inside nanoparticle.
The different contrasts can be understood by difference of atom-
ic numbers: a copper atom (Cu, 29) is lighter than a silver atom
(Ag, 47). Therefore, it has been concluded that the nanoparticle
in Figure 1c is an Ag core–Cu shell nanoparticle having 15 nm in
size successfully prepared by step-by-step reduction of the two
precursors. Additionally, nanoparticles of the sample S3 were
aggregated forming the large particles over 100 nm in size (see
Supporting Information Figure S1).14
A lot of Cu/Ag nanoparticles were observed in an image
of the wide sight (Figure 1b) as indicated by the arrows. The
number of the nanoparticles having the core–shell structure
was counted to be 18 in 107. That is, the Cu/Ag nanoparticles
were prepared by 17%. From the contrast of each particle, other
nanoparticles having homogeneous contrast differing from clear
contrast of the Cu/Ag nanoparticles were found. It was difficult
to distinguish between silver and copper nanoparticles from the
fringes of the particles because of small difference of lattice
One of the authors (T. Nakamura) thanks the financial
support of the 21st COE of Osaka University. This work was
supported by a Grant for Practical Application of University
Research and Development Results under the Matching Fund
Method of NEDO, Creation and Support Program for Start-ups
from Universities of JST, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research on Priority Areas (417) (No. 17029038) from MEXT
of the Japanese Government.
References and Notes
1
2
Y. Song, H. Modrow, L. L. Henry, C. K. Saw, E. E. Doomes,
3
4
Y. Yang, J. Ouyang, L. Ma, R. J.-H. Tseng, C.-W. Chu, Adv.
R. A. Ganeev, A. I. Ryasnyansky, A. L. Stepanov, C.
5
6
7
8
9
M. Tsuji, N. Miyamae, S. Lim, K. Kimura, X. Zhang, S.
J. He, I. Ichinose, T. Kunitake, A. Nakao, Y. Shiraishi, N.
H. Tada, F. Suzuki, S. Ito, T. Akita, K. Tanaka, T. Kawahara,
˚
´
M. Gaudry, E. Cottancin, M. Pellarin, J. Lerme, L. Arnaud,
J. R. Huntzinger, J. L. Vialle, M. Broyer, J. R. Rousset,
spacing with 0.3 A. ED pattern of the prepared Cu/Ag nanopar-
ticles (Figure 1b, inset) showed the copresence of fcc structures
of Ag and Cu.
´
UV–vis spectrum of the sample S1 is shown in Figure 2 (sol-
id line). The UV–vis spectrum had a peak at 407 nm attributed to
surface plasmon absorption of silver nanoparticles.12,15
Dash line in Figure 2 shows the UV–vis spectrum of the
sample S2. Damping, broadening, and red-shifting of the peak
around 407 nm were observed. This variation of the spectrum
should be caused by variation of mean free path of free electron
in silver nanoparticles and dielectric constant surrounding a sil-
ver nanoparticle. Cottancin et al.9 have reported change in the
plasmon absorption of Ag nanoparticles by converting them into
the core–shell nanoparticles with Co. Our observation in the ab-
sorption spectra should indicate that the surface plasmon absorp-
tion of silver nanoparticles was varied by change of dielectric
10 P. V. Kazakevich, A. V. Simakin, V. V. Voronov, G. A.
11 M. Cazayous, C. Langlois, T. Oikawa, C. Ricolleau, A.
12 T. Yamamoto, Y. Wada, T. Sakata, H. Mori, M. Goto, S.
13 T. Nakamura, Y. Tsukahara, T. Sakata, H. Mori, Y. Kanbe,
H. Bessho, Y. Wada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., in press.
14 Supporting Information is available electronically on the
index.html.
15 M. Yamamoto, Y. Kashiwagi, M. Nakamoto, Langmuir