with the calculated data for the other polytypes as well.4
However, no other line of other polytypes matches with the
experimentally observed data. Hence, their presence in our
samples is ruled out.
rapid quenching of the substrate during diamond growth is
known to enhance the formation of noncubic diamond
phases.4,12 The rapid changes in the substrate temperature
during growth in our case is expected to contribute to the
synthesis of 15R polytype. Study of the dependence of
growth of 15R and other diamond polytype phases as a func-
tion of deposition parameters is in progress.
In summary, a new phase of diamond which matches
very well with the theoretically calculated data for the 15R
structure of diamond has been observed. X-ray diffraction
results show that this phase is the most dominant phase in the
coatings obtained by the oxy-acetylene flame method.
The authors are thankful to Professor K. L. Chopra for
his valuable suggestions and interest. One of the authors ͑R.
Kapil͒ is grateful to University Grants Commission ͑India͒
for providing a research fellowship. Authors are also thank-
ful to Department of Science and Technology for providing a
research grant.
Six other peaks ͑Nos. 1, 2, 5, 12, 16, 21͒ with d
ϭ3.206 (I/I0ϭ49), 2.794 ͑25͒, 2.415 ͑2͒, 1.979 ͑4͒, 1.596
͑14͒, 1.386 ͑16͒ have been assigned to the cubic carbon
phase. This phase has been observed by Aust et al.15 during
resistance measurements on graphite as a function of pres-
sure. Transformation of graphite to cubic carbon phase has
been observed to take place at a pressure greater than 150
kbar. Some of the peaks ͑marked by f) shown in Table I have
not been reported earlier. However, they are consistent with
the other ͑hkl͒ values calculated using the lattice parameter
aϭ5.545 Å as in Ref. 15.
The XRD peaks ͑Nos. 8, 17, 23, 28͒ are assigned to the
molybdenum, and are due to the substrate. The remaining
peaks ͑Nos. 4, 6, 7, 25͒ match very well with the ASTM data
for Mo2C ͑3H͒ phase and confirm the Mo2C ͑3H͒ phase in
our film. The formation of the Mo2C phase at the substrate
film interface during the initial stages of diamond growth is
expected due to the reaction between molybdenum and car-
bon. Presence of Mo2C at the interface has been confirmed
by glancing angle x-ray diffraction measurements recorded
at various glancing angles.
1 K. E. Spear, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 171 ͑1989͒.
2 J. C. Angus, Y. Wang, and M. Sunkara, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 21, 221
͑1991͒.
3 L. M. Hanssen, K. A. Snail, W. A. Carrington, J. E. Butler, S. Kellogg,
and D. B. Oakes, Thin Solid Films 196, 271 ͑1991͒.
4 P. D. Ownby, X. Yang, and J. Liu, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1876 ͑1992͒.
5 K. E. Spear, A. W. Phelps, and W. B. White, J. Mater. Res. 5, 2277
͑1990͒.
Some of the peaks ͑Nos. 19, 22, 24, 26, 27͒ in our
sample are close to the standard data for more than one of the
phases. However, this does not affect the overall conclusions
drawn earlier. Peak No. 3 is unidentified.
6 C. E. Holcombe, Calculated X-Ray Diffraction Data for Polymorphic
Forms of Carbon, Report No. Y-1887, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, July 23,
1973.
7 A. W. Phelps, W. Howard, W. B. White, K. E. Spear, and D. Huang,
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 162, 213 ͑1989͒.
Intermittent deposition and a possible quenching of the
substrate during growth may be responsible for the growth of
15R polytype. Because of the substrate rotation, different
regions of the substrate pass through different deposition and
no deposition zones of the flame, repeatedly. As the substrate
moves through the flame area, the temperature of the sub-
strate surface in direct contact with the flame is expected to
increase and deposition of the film takes place. The substrate
temperature is expected to fall significantly when this portion
comes out of the flame ͑no deposition zone͒. This cycle is
then repeated with the substrate rotation. In CVD techniques,
8 P. D Ownby and R. W. Stewart, in ASM Engineered Materials Handbook
͑ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992͒, Vol. 4.
9 F. P. Bundy and J. S. Kasper, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3437 ͑1967͒.
10 W. Howard, D. Huang, J. Yuan, M. Frenklach, K. E. Spear, R. Koba, and
A. W. Phelps, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 1247 ͑1990͒.
11 M. Frenklach, R. Kematick, D. Huang, W. Howard, K. E. Spear, A. W.
Phelps, and R. Koba, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 395 ͑1989͒.
12 M. Rossi, G. Vitali, M. L. Terranova, and V. Sessa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63,
2765 ͑1993͒.
13 R. Kapil, B. R. Mehta, and V. D. Vankar, J. Mater. Sci. ͑to be published͒.
14 R. Kapil, B. R. Mehta, and V. D. Vankar, Bull. Mater. Sci. ͑to be pub-
lished͒.
15 R. B. Aust and H. G. Drickamer, Science 140, 817 ͑1963͒.
2522 Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 68, No. 18, 29 April 1996 Kapil, Mehta, and Vankar
137.149.200.5 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:22:41