a
p s s
1948
F. Fellah et al.: Magnetic properties of ultrafine-grained cobalt samples
The fitted value of the saturation magnetization confirms the obtained values of the magnetization at saturation and of
the assumption of a negligible magnetic anisotropy. On the the exchange stiffness constant.
other hand, it indicates that the contribution of a nonferro-
Acknowledgements This work was conducted in the
framework of an interdisciplinary research program at LPMTM.
K. B. is very grateful to the University of Paris 13 for the stay as a
visiting Professor.
magnetic phase, if it exists in the grain-boundaries region, is
negligible. This is also confirmed by the value of the
exchange stiffness constant A that we have determined that is
a strong indication that the magnetic ‘‘contact’’ between the
particles after the consolidation process is not significantly
altered, eventually, by the presence of a secondary crystal-
line phase (antiferromagnetic CoO phase, cobalt oxide,
amorphous phase, etc.) at the grain boundaries, which could
lower A. A similar feature has been recently reported on Co
polycrystalline nanomaterials with an average grain size of
10 nm where no reduction in exchange stiffness has been
observed despite the presence of a high volume of grain
boundaries [45]. It is interesting to note that XRD
measurements showed that the sample consolidated by HIP
presents a more or less noticeable amount of cobalt oxide
CoO (6%), whereas those consolidated by SPS are pure
cobalt phases. This can be due to the difference in the
elaboration protocol [21]. However, no significant variation
of the fitted magnetic parameters was noticed in the case of
the HIP240 sample. The CoO contribution remains negli-
gible. As pointed out in the introduction, indeed the
exchange coupling between the grains depends on the
magnetic nature of the intergranular region, as observed in
multiphase systems [11]. Studies of collective spin waves in
Co100–xCrx alloy films by means of BLS at room temperature
[46, 47] reported a strong reduction of the magnetic
exchange constant when the Cr content increases, a value
of Dech ¼ 0.75 ꢂ 10ꢀ9 erg cm2 has been obtained for
example for x ¼ 15.7 at%, almost four times lower than
the bulk value [46] while a reduction by an order of
magnitude was found for Cr content reaching 50 at% [47].
The segregation of nonmagnetic Cr along grain boundaries
was discussed as the possible origin of this drastic reduction.
Thus, we can infer that the consolidation routes used in this
work insure a good magnetic interfacial contact between the
particles.
References
[1] J. L. Dormann and D. Fiorani, Magnetic Properties of Fine
Particles (North-Holland, New York, 1992).
[2] H. Gleiter, Nanostruct. Mater. 6, 3 (1995).
[3] T. G. Langdon, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 462, 3 (2007).
[4] F. Wetscher, A. Vorhauer, and R. Pippan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
410/411, 213 (2005).
[5] U. Erb, Nanostruct. Mater. 6, 533 (1995).
[6] R. Hasegawa, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 329, 1 (2003).
`
[7] C. Rizkallah, J. P. Fondere, H. F. Raynaud, and A. Vignes,
Cahier d’Informations Techniques/Sciences et Genie des
´
´
Materiaux (Edition Diffusion Presse (EDP) Sciences, France,
2001), p. 1109.
[8] B.-N. Kim, K. Hiraga, K. Morita, and H. Yoshida, Scr. Mater.
57, 607 (2007).
[9] J. A. Bas, J. A. Calero, and M. J. Dougan, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 254/255, 391 (2003).
ˇ´
´
[10] J. Fu¨zer, J. Bednarcık, P. Kollar, and S. Roth, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 316, e834 (2007).
[11] G. Herzer, Scr. Metall. Mater. 33, 1741 (1995).
[12] G. Herzer, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 1397 (1990).
[13] R. Alben, J. J. Becker, and M. C. Chi, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 1653
(1978).
[14] J. P. Perez, V. Dupuis, J. Tuaillon, A. Perez, V. Paillard, P.
Melinon, M. Treilleux, L. Thomas, B. Barbara, and B.
Bouchet Fabre, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 145, 74 (1995).
¨
[15] J. F. Loffler, J. P. Meier, B. Doudin, J.-P. Ansermet, and W.
Wagner, Phys. Rev. B 57, 2915 (1998).
[16] F. Pfeifer and C. Radeloff, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 19, 190
(1980).
[17] J. Vogel, J. Moritz, and O. Fruchart, C. R. Phys. 7, 977
(2006).
¨
¨
[18] H. E. Schafer, H. Kisker, H. Kronmuller, and R. Wursum,
¨
Nanostruct. Mater. 1, 523 (1992).
[19] H. Kisker, T. Gessmann, R. Wu¨rsum, H. Kronmu¨ller, and H.
4 Conclusions The static and dynamic properties of
Co nanoparticles and subsequently consolidated samples
were studied. The static magnetization behavior is found to
be characteristic of a soft magnetic material showing weak
values of the squareness and of the coercive field. The
magnetization behavior seems to obey a nucleation/propa-
gation scheme. A curling process can, however, be involved
in the magnetization reversal for the smaller (50-nm size)
particles. In fact, based on the correlation between values of
coercive fields and grain size, we believe that the coercivity
is mainly associated with nucleation of reverse domains
rather than with pinning of domain walls. The lamellar
microstructure could also influence the grain-size depen-
dence of coercivity. The structural and dynamic properties,
confirm that the samples exhibit a vanishing magnetic
anisotropy. The intergranular region seems to not alter the
¨
E. Schafer, Nanostruct. Mater. 6, 925 (1995).
[20] F. Fellah, G. Dirras, J. Gubicza, F. Schoenstein, N. Jouini, S.
´
M. Cherif, C. Gatel, and J. Douin, J. Alloys Compd. 489, 424
(2010).
[21] F. Fellah, F. Schoenstein, A. Dakhlaoui-Omrani, S. M.
Cherif, G. Dirras, and N. Jouini, J. Alloys Compd. (to be
published).
[22] L. Poul, S. Ammar, N. Jouini, F. Fievet, and F. Villain, J. Sol-
Gel Sci. Technol. 26, 261 (2003).
[23] S. O. Demokritov and E. Tsymbal, J. Phys. C 6, 7145 (1994).
´
[24] N. A. Sergeeva, S. M. Cherif, A. A. Stashkevich, M. P.
Kostylev, and J. Ben Youssef, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 288,
250 (2005).
[25] M. J. N. V. Prasad, S. Suwas, and A. H. Chokshi, Mater. Sci.
Eng. A 503, 86 (2009).
[26] Z. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Zhang, and C. Shi, Solid State
Commun. 139, 403 (2006).
magnetic exchange between the grains, as is deduced from [27] X. M. Liu and Y. C. Zhou, J. Cryst. Growth 270, 527 (2004).
ß 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim