J.C. Juan et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 272 (2007) 91–95
95
are considered to be the active centers for esterification of fatty
acid. Preliminary results show that the esterification may take
place through a ligand exchange reaction with fatty acid on the
Bronsted acid sites, although we do not have decisive evidence.
4. Conclusions
This paper has shown that there is a correlation between
catalytic activity and thermal treatment of ZS for esterifica-
tion reaction. A close relationship between acidity and catalytic
activity could be observed. We can correlate the higher activity
exhibited by the ZS at various thermal treatment to its acid-
ity. The different hydrate or phase transformation was obtained
upon heating the ZS sample. They give rise to different XRD
patterns, FTIR spectra, acidity and catalytic activity. The results
show that ZS treated at 200 ◦C is the most active due to higher
amount of acidity. It is demonstrated that upon heating the ZS
sample to 420 ◦C, the crystalline phase and acidity changes are
due to hydration of ZS. One of the active sites, which get poi-
soned by Cs+ ion exchange, should be related to the hydroxyl
groups (Bronsted acid sites). This fact leads us to assume that
Bronsted acid sites should mainly responsible for activity of ZS.
Fig. 7. Effect of Cs+ ion exchanged on the activity of ZS with no Cs+ treated
at 420 ◦C (A), after first treatment with CsCl (B), after second treatment with
CsCl (C), and without catalyst (D). The reaction was carried out under the same
conditions as stated above for comparison purposes.
comparison purposes, the reaction condition is the same as
shown in Fig. 6. The conversion was 52% and second treatment
with CsCl yielded a still lower conversion of 44%. Although,
the poisoning experiments (Fig. 7) suggest the participation of
protons in the chemical reaction, the fact that the catalyst does
not get totally indicates that the catalytic activity of ZS is gov-
erned not only by the number of protons or acid sites but also
certain unknown inherent characteristics or surface defects cre-
ated by structural modification at elevated temperature. In other
words, the present observations suggest the presence of at least
two kinds of sites on ZS as mentioned above. One of the sites,
which get poisoned by Cs+ ion exchange, should be related to the
hydroxyl group (Bronsted acid site). This fact leads us to assume
that the second kind of site which does not get poisoned by Cs+
ion or by thermal treatment should be responsible for the resid-
ual activity of ZS. This second kind of site should be associated
either with the phase transformation to zirconium–oxygen bond
stretching or Lewis-type centers formed by removal of protons.
Preliminary results show that Lewis-type centers formation is
more pronounced. Besides that, it may also assume that Bronsted
acid sites are mainly responsible for activity of ZS. The Bron-
sted acid sites result from the weakening of the –OH bond by the
sulfate groups attached to Zr. Meanwhile, the Lewis acid sites
are shorts of electrons, at Zr4+ centers as the result of electron
withdrawing nature of the sulfate groups. These active species
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 20076004) and National Malaysia
Ministry of Science and Technology (IRPA grant 09-02-
02-0033) for the financial support. We are also grateful to
UNESCO/China Great Wall Co-Sponsored program for a fel-
lowship to J.C. Juan.
References
[1] Y. Huang, B. Zhao, Y. Xie, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 173 (1998) 27.
[2] K. Arata, M. Hino, N. Yamagata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1990) 244.
[3] I.J. Bear, W.G. Mumme, Acta Cryst. B 26 (1970) 1140.
[4] J. Singer, D.T. Cromer, Acta Cryst. 12 (1959) 719.
[5] W. Cao, J. Zhang, Q. Lv, J. Beijing Univ. Chem. Technol. 26 (1999) 72.
[6] W. Cao, J. Zhang, Q. Lv, J. Petrochem. Univ. 13 (2000) 41.
[7] G. Alberti, M.G. Bernasconi, M. Casciola, U. Costantino, Ann. Chim. 68
(1978) 265.
[8] I.J. Bear, Aust. J. Chem. 20 (1967) 415.
[9] N.S. Kotsareneko, V.P. Shmachkova, Kinet. Catal. 43 (2002) 280.
[10] C.A. Strydom, G. Pretorius, Thermochim. Acta 223 (1993) 223.
[11] C. Miao, W. Hua, J. Chen, Z. Gao, Catal. Lett. 37 (1996) 187.
[12] J.R. Sohn, D.H. Seo, Catal. Today 87 (2003) 219.
[13] E.E. Platero, M.P. Mentruit, C.O. Arean, A. Zecchina, J. Catal. 162 (1996)
268.
[14] I.J. Bear, W.G. Mumme, Acta Cryst. B 26 (1970) 1125.