2
NO groups from the dpo ligands. In order to quantify the
ꢀ
–
We thank the University of Ottawa (start-up), the Canada
Foundation for Innovation (CFI), FFCR, and NSERC
(Discovery and RTI grants) for their support. We thank Prof.
Tom K. Woo for use of the computing facilities funded by the
CFI and the Ontario Research Fund.
magnitude of the magnetic interactions, an isotropic Heisen-
berg trinuclear model of S = 3/2 spins was employed using the
following spin Hamiltonian: H = ꢀ2J(S S + S S ) where J
1
2
2 3
IV
is the exchange interactions between Mn ions in 1 and S the
i
IV
spin vector for each metal ion (S = 3/2 for Mn with
1
i = 1–3). Application of the van Vleck equation to Kambe’s
i
0
Notes and references
1
1
vector coupling scheme gives an excellent fit of the experi-
mental data from 300 K to 10 K. In order to fit the low
temperature wT product below 10 K, intermolecular interac-
tions (J ) were introduced in the frame of the mean field
1
theory. This approach leads to an excellent least-squares fit
of the experimental data down to 1.8 K and affords the
z Crystal data for 1: C98
3 10
H90Mn N O12, M = 1764.6, dark brown
ꢀ
rectangle, triclinic, P1, a = 11.583(5), b = 12.119(6), c = 17.112(8) A,
˚
3
˚
a = 84.547(10), b= 85.258(9), g = 67.058(10)1, V = 2199.3(18) A ,
Z = 1, T = 201(2) K, 13 737 reflections collected of which 6248 were
independent (Rint = 0.1183), 587 parameters and 54 restraints, R1 =
0
2
0.0868 [based on I 4 2s(I)], wR2 = 0.2347 (based on F and all data).
CCDC 676451.
following parameters: J/kB = +11.5(1) K, g = 2.06(1) and
0
1
2
3
. R. Hage, J. E. Iburg, J. Kerschner, J. H. Koek, E. L. M. Lempers,
R. J. Martens, U. S. Racherla, S. W. Russel, J. Swarthoff, M. R.
P. Van Vliet, J. B. Warnaar, L. van der Wolf and B. Krijnen,
Nature, 1994, 369, 637.
J /k = ꢀ0.06(1) K. This magnetic behavior is consistent with
B
a ground state of S = 9/2 with the first (S = 7/2) and second
T
(S = 5/2) excited states being 34.2 and 69.7 K higher in
. (a) G. Renger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1987, 26, 643;
(
energy, respectively.
b) K. Wieghardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 725;
(c) S. Mukhopadhyay, S. K. Mandal, S. Bhaduri and
W. H. Armstrong, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 3981.
The field dependence (up to 7 T) of the magnetization at
different temperatures (1.8 to 8 K) has also been measured for
. (a) C. J. Milios, A. Vinslava, W. Wernsdorfer, S. Moggach,
S. Parsons, S. P. Perlepes, G. Christou and E. K. Brechin,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2754; (b) A. M. Ako, I. J. Hewitt,
V. Mereacre, R. Clerac, W. Wernsdorfer, C. E. Anson and
A. K. Powell, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4926;
1
(inset Fig. 3). The magnetization at 1.8 K saturates above 4 T
at 9.6 m in good agreement with the S = 9/2 ground state.
B
T
The clear saturation of the magnetization suggests the absence
of a significant magnetic anisotropy and also the presence of a
(
c) S. Koizumi, M. Nihei, M. Nakano and H. Oshio, Inorg.
well defined S = 9/2 ground state with well-separated excited
T
Chem., 2005, 44, 1208; (d) C. Dendrinou-Samara, M. Alexiou,
C. M. Zaleski, Jeff. W. Kampf, M. L. Kirk, D. P. Kessissoglou
and V. L. Pecoraro, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3763.
. R. Sessoli, H.-L. Tsai, A. R. Schake, S. Wang, J. B. Vincent,
K. Folting, D. Gatteschi, G. Christou and D. N. Hendrickson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 1804.
states as shown by the analysis of the wT vs. T data. To further
confirm the S = 9/2 ground state, the M vs. H/T data have
T
4
been fitted to an S = 9/2 Brillouin function that leads to an
T
excellent theory–experiment agreement with a g factor of
2
.11(4). Furthermore, ac susceptibility measurements have
5. A. M. Beauchemin, J. Moran, M. Lebrun, C. Seguin,
E. Dimitrijevic, L. Zhang and S. I. Gorelsky, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 1410.
also been performed on 1; however, no out-of-phase signal
has been detected and thus, 1 does not exhibit single molecule
magnet (SMM) behavior. To our knowledge there is only one
6
. (a) D. J. Price, S. R. Batten, K. J. Berry, B. Moubaraki and
K. S. Murray, Polyhedron, 2003, 22, 165; (b) B. F. G. Johnson,
A. Sieker, A. J. Blake and R. E. P. Winpenny, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1993, 1345; (c) F. Birkelbach, U. Florke,
H. J. Haupt, C. Butzlaff, A. X. Trautwein, K. Wieghardt and
P. Chaudhuri, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 2000.
1
3
linear trinuclear manganese SMM reported to date, which
III
II
comprises a central Mn ion and two peripheral Mn ions
coupled ferromagnetically with an S = 7 spin ground state.
The magnetic anisotropy of the latter SMM originates mainly
7. Z. Xu, L. K. Thompson, D. O. Miller, H. J. Clase, J. A.
K. Howard and A. E. Goeta, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 3620 and
references therein.
III
from the central Mn ion. With this in mind, the DFT
calculations and electrochemical studies on 1 clearly show
III
8
9
. DFT details and references are given in the ESIw.
. (a) BVS calculations for 1: 4.02 and 3.87 for Mn1 and Mn2,
respectively; (b) I. D. Brown and D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr.,
Sect. B: Struct. Sci., 1985, B41, 244.
IV
that the central Mn ion is likely to be reduced to a Mn
ion. We therefore believe a reduction of the central Mn2 ion to
III
Mn would introduce magnetic anisotropy to 1, which could
1
0. J. H. van Vleck, The Theory of Electric and Magnetic Suscept-
ibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1932.
then lead to SMM properties. Synthetic efforts to isolate the
IV
one electron reduced Mn Mn Mn complex are currently
underway.
III
IV
1
1. K. Kambe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 1950, 5, 48.
12. Using the mean-field approximation to treat the inter-complex
interactions, the following definition of the susceptibility has been
used:
In conclusion, we have synthesized the first example of a
ferromagnetically coupled exclusively chelating ligand bridged
IV
high-valent trinuclear Mn complex. The presence of bulky
w
trimer
0
zJ
2
2
Ph groups on the specifically designed and synthesized oximate
ligand have a direct influence on the bridging torsion angles;
confirmed by DFT calculations. We believe this could, in turn,
induce the ferromagnetic interactions observed between the
metal centers. Further calculations investigating the influence
of the Mn–N–O–Mn torsion angle on the strength and nature
of the magnetic interactions are currently underway.
w ¼
2
1
ꢀ
wtrimer
Ng m
B
see for example: (a) B. E. Myers, L. Berger and S. J. Friedberg,
J. Appl. Phys., 1969, 40, 1149; (b) C. J. O’Connor, Prog. Inorg.
Chem., 1982, 29, 203.
1
3. R. T. W. Scott, S. Parsons, M. Murugesu, W. Wernsdorfer,
G. Christou and E. K. Brechin, Chem. Commun., 2005, 2083.
2
784 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 2782–2784
This journal is ꢂc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008