P. Gull, A.A. Hashmi / Journal of Molecular Structure 1139 (2017) 264e268
265
ancillary ligand. Further, the synthesised ligand and the complexes
were characterized by various physical and spectroscopic tech-
niques. The bio-relevancy of these complexes have been profes-
sionally studied and explored by anti-microbial studies.
n
(NO) 1610, ʋ(MeN) 446. 1H NMR (d-CDCl3): 9.0 (s, NH); 3.92 (s,
eNH2); 7.10e8.0 (m, Ar-H) ppm. UV/Vis (DMSO, lmax (nm): 642,
508. MS (m/z): 561 [M]þ.
[Zn(L)]: Yield: 69%. Anal. Calc. (%) for (C26H22ZnN6O5):
(563.88 g molꢀ1): C, 55.38; H 3.93; N, 14.90. Found: C, 55.15; H,
3.75; N, 14.80. FT-IR (KBr), cmꢀ1: ʋ(NeH) 3343, ʋ(C]N) 1620, ʋ(C]
2. Experimental protocols
O) 1705, n
(NO) 1610, ʋ(MeN) 435. 1H NMR (d-CDCl3): 9.0 (s, 1H);
4.20 (s, for eNH2); 7.10e8.75 (m, Ar-H) ppm. UV/Vis (DMSO, lmax
2.1. Reagents and instruments
(nm): 320. MS (m/z): 562 [M]þ
The chemicals and solvents of analytical grade were purchased
directly from Aldrich and Fluka and used without any further pu-
rification. Elemental analyses (C, H, and N) were performed with a
PerkineElmer 2400 series II analyzer. 1H NMR spectroscopic mea-
surements were performed on a Varian 500 MHz spectrometer in
d-CDCl3, using TMS (SiMe4) as an internal reference at room tem-
perature. Infrared spectra (4000-400 cmꢀ1) were collected on a
Perkin Elmer 100/ATR spectrophotometer at 25 ꢁC using KBr plates.
UVeVis spectra were recorded with a Perkin Elmer double-beam
spectrophotometer using a quartz glass cell with a path length of
10 mm. The molar conductance values (10ꢀ3 mol Lꢀ1) of the com-
plexes, in DMSO, were measured using a Systronic Conductivity
Bridge 304. X-ray diffraction spectra of copper and zinc complexes
are carried out with powdered compounds using RIGAKU ULTIMA
IV diffractometer system at 25 ꢁC in Cu anode source and the
generator settings as 30 mA, 40 kV.
2.4. Antimicrobial activity
The synthesised metal complexes were evaluated for their
antimicrobial potential against some strains of bacteria and fungi
like Escherchia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus and
Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus and candida albicans respectively.
The compounds were dissolved in DMSO to get the required test
solutions.
3. Results and discussions
All complexes gave satisfactory elemental analyses results
which were in good agreement with those calculated for the sug-
gested formulae and shown in Table 1. The complexes are insoluble
in water or in nonpolar organic solvents (CCl4, Cyclohexane) and
soluble in DMSO or DMF solutions. The molar conductance of the
solid complexes measured by Systronic Conductivity Bridge 304
indicated the non-electrolytic nature of the complexes [18]. Various
crystallization attempts using mixtures of solvents and low tem-
peratures, were unsuccessful for the growth of a single crystal
suitable for X-ray crystallography. However, the analytical, spec-
troscopic and magnetic data facilitated the possible structure of the
synthesised complexes to be proposed.
2.2. Synthesis of Schiff base (E)-2-(2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)
hydrazono)-1,2-diphenylethanone (L)
A hot ethanoic solution (20 mL) of 1, 2-diphenylethane-1, 2-
dione and (1 g, 0.005 mol), and a hot ethanolic solution (20 mL)
of Dinitrophenyl hydrazine (0.93 g, 0.005 mol) are mixed slowly
with constant stirring. The mixture is refluxed at 75 ꢁC for 6e7 h in
presence of few drops of concentrated HCl (pH 3e4). On cooling, a
solid yellow coloured precipitate is formed, which was filtered,
washed with cold EtOH, and dried under vacuum over P4O10
(Scheme 1).
3.1. Molar conductance and elemental analysis measurements
The molar conductivities of 10ꢀ3 M solutions of the synthesised
metal Complexes in DMF solution showed values in the range of
L: Yield: 67%. Anal. Calc. (%) for C20H14N4O5 (390 g molꢀ1): C,
61.54; H 3.62; N, 14.33. Found: C, 61.50; H, 3.58; N, 14.29. FT-IR
2e5
U
ꢀ1cm2molꢀ1 representing the non-electrolytic nature of the
(KBr), cmꢀ1: ʋ(NeH) 3336, (C]N) 1625, ʋ(C]O) 1710,
n(NO)
metal complexes [19,20]. The elemental analysis results of the
metal complexes also agree with the calculated values. The molar
conductance and elemental analysis data (as shown in Table 1)
shows the formula for metal complexes as [M(C26H22N6O5)] where
M ¼ Cu(II) and Zn(II).
1610. 1H NMR (d-CDCl3): 9.01 (s, 1H); 7.18e8.76 (m, Ar-H) ppm. MS
(m/z): 391 [MþH]þ.
2.3. Synthesis of metal complexes
An ethanolic solution of metal (II) chloride (1 mmol) was stirred
with an ethanolic solution of the Schiff base (L) (1 mmol) and
ethanolic solution of benzene-1,2-diamine (1 mmol) for 1 h and the
mixture was then refluxed for 3 h on a water bath. The solid
complexes were precipitated and the precipitate was filtered off,
washed thoroughly with ethanol and dried in vacuo (Scheme 2).
[Cu(L)]: Yield: 69%. Anal. Calc. (%) for (C26H22CuN6O5)
(562 g molꢀ1): C, 55.56; H 3.95; N, 14.95. Found: C, 54.10; H 3.88; N,
13.90. FT-IR (KBr), cmꢀ1: ʋ(NeH) 3342, ʋ(C]N) 1610, ʋ(C]O) 1710
3.2. IR spectra
The IR Spectra of ligand and its metal complexes were obtained
on
a
Perkin-Elmer Series 2000 apparatus in the range
4000e200 cmꢀ1. The infrared spectra of the synthesised primary
Schiff base ligand (Fig. S1) shows the absorption band at 1625 cmꢀ1
corresponds to the imine (>C]N) group [21] and a strong band at
1710 cmꢀ1 corresponding to the >C]O group which confirms the
complete condensation of the two reacting moieties. In addition to
Scheme 1. Structure of the Schiff base ligand.