Kinetics of the CH3O2 + NO Reaction
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 22, 1999 4383
TABLE 3: Chemical Reactions Used in Kinetics Modeling
for Branching Ratio Determination
overall rate constant indicate the possibility of a low-temperature
pressure-dependent channel and CH3ONO2 production would
be expected to be maximized under these conditions, we
attempted to investigate the temperature dependence of the
branching ratio. However, reduced CIMS sensitivity for CH3-
ONO2 at the lower temperatures precluded the determination
of a comparably good upper limit as that obtained at 295 K.
k (cm3 molecule-1 s-1
)
reaction
at 295 K, 100 Torra
CH3O2 + NO f CH3O + NO2
CH3O2 + CH3O2 f 2CH3O + O2
CH3O2 + CH3O2 f CH2O + CH3OH + O2
CH3O2 + NO2 f CH3O2NO2
CH3O + NO f CH3ONO
CH3O + NO2 f CH3ONO2
CH3O + O2 f CH2O + HO2
HO2 + NO f OH + NO2
OH + NO f HONO
7.0 × 10-12
1.4 × 10-13
2.8 × 10-13
1.8 × 10-12
1.3 × 10-11
1.2 × 10-11
1.8 × 10-15
8.2 × 10-12
1.8 × 10-12
1.1 × 10-10
1.9 × 10-12
3.5 × 10-12
1.0 × 10-11
Conclusions
The results presented here extend the measurements of the
overall rate constant for CH3O2 + NO reaction to the temper-
ature and pressure conditions representative of the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere. Although our value for the
room temperature rate constant agrees well with the current
recommendation for stratospheric modeling, our values for the
rate constant at the lowest temperatures attained in this study
(203 K) are about 50% higher than the same recommendation,
which was largely determined from low-pressure measurements
(∼3 Torr). However, our low-temperature results are in agree-
ment with previous studies at similar pressure (∼100 Torr),
suggesting the possibility of an increased pressure-dependent
component to the rate constant at low temperature. No CH3-
ONO2 product was detected (using CH3ONO2 specific detection
methods for the first time) from the CH3O2 + NO reaction, but
an improved upper limit of 0.03 (at 295 K and 100 torr) for
this branching channel [k4b/(k4a + k4b)] was determined.
OH + HO2 f H2O + O2
OH + OH f H2O2
OH + NO2 f HNO3
OH + CH2O f H2O + HCO
a From ref 17.
TABLE 4: Branching Ratio Measurement Conditions and
Analysis
parameter
value
pressure (Torr)
temperature (K)
100
295
20
initial observation time (ms)
final observation time (ms)
initial [CH3O2] (molecule cm-3
47
)
1.43 × 1012
1.75 × 1013
5.0 × 1017
2.8 × 109
initial [NO] (molecule cm-3
)
initial [O2] (molecule cm-3
)
[CH3ONO2] (molecule cm-3) resulting from
CH3O + NO2 reaction
Acknowledgment. This research was funded by grants from
the Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation, American Chemical
Society-Petroleum Research Fund, Research Corporation, the
Michigan Space Grant Consortium, and the National Science
Foundation.
minimum detectable [CH3ONO2] (molecule cm-3
)
3.3 × 109
upper limit for k4b (cm3 molecule-1 s-1) determined
2.0 × 10-13
from kinetics conditions and kinetic modeling
TABLE 5: Results from Direct Branching Ratio Studies of
the CH3O2 + NO Reaction
References and Notes
product temperature pressure
k4b/
(1) Bertman, S. B.; Roberts, J. M.; Parrish, D. D.; Buhr, M. P.; Goldan,
P. D.; Kuster, W. C.; Fehsenfeld, F. C.; Montzka, S. A.; Westberg, H. J.
Geophys. Res. 1995, 100, 22805.
study
monitored
(K)
(Torr) (k4a + k4b)
Ravishankara et al.6 NO2
298
298
295
40
8
100
<0.24
<0.20
<0.03
(2) Flocke, F.; Atlas, E.; Madronich, S.; Schauffler, S. M.; Aikin, K.;
Margitan, J. J.; Bui, T. P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 1891.
(3) Wennberg, P. O.; Hanisco, T. F.; Jaegle´, L.; Jacob, D. J.; Hintsa,
E. J.; Lanzendorf, E. J.; Anderson, J. G.; Gao, R.; Keim, E. R.; Donnelly,
S. G.; Negro, L. A.; Fahey, D. W.; McKeen, S. A.; Salawitch, R. J.; Webster,
C. R.; May, R. D.; Herman, R. L.; Proffitt, M. H.; Margitan, J. J.; Atlas, E.
L.; Schauffler, S. M.; Flocke, F.; McElroy, C. T.; Bui, T. P. Science 1998,
279, 49.
(4) Cox, R. A.; Tyndall, G. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1979, 65, 357.
(5) Sander, S. P.; Watson, R. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 1664.
(6) Ravishankara, A. R.; Eisele, F. L.; Kreutter, N. M.; Wine, P. H. J.
Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 2267.
(7) Simonaitis, R.; Heicklen, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2946.
(8) Plumb, I. C.; Ryan, K. R.; Steven, J. R.; Mulcahy, M. F. R. J.
Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 3136.
(9) Zellner, R.; Fritz, B.; Lorenz, K. J. Atmos. Chem. 1986, 4, 241.
(10) Sehested, J.; Nielson, O. J.; Wallington, T. J. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1993, 213, 457.
(11) Villalta, P. W.; Huey, L. G.; Howard, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 5808.
(12) Carter, W. P. L.; Atkinson, R. J. Atmos. Chem. 1989, 8, 165.
(13) Seeley, J. V.; Jayne, J. T.; Molina, M. J. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1993,
25, 571.
(14) Seeley, J. V.; Meads, R. F.; Elrod, M. J.; Molina, M. J. J. Phys.
Chem. 1996, 100, 4026.
(15) Elrod, M. J.; Meads, R. F.; Lipson, J. B.; Seeley, J. V.; Molina, M.
J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 5808.
Zellner et al.9
this work
CH3O
CH3ONO2
ONO2 branching ratio [k4b/(k4a + k4b)]. These measurements
were performed with much higher sensitivity than previous
efforts because the CH3ONO2 product was directly monitored
by the CIMS method described above. Table 3 lists the chemical
reactions and relevant rate constants used in the kinetics
modeling to determine the experimental upper limit for the
CH3ONO2 branching ratio. Table 4 lists a typical set of
experimental conditions, maximum predicted [CH3ONO2] pro-
duced from the side reaction CH3O + NO2 (reaction 13), and
the overall CH3ONO2 detection sensitivity for the branching
ratio measurement (defined as a signal/noise ratio of 2:1). As
can be seen from this table for these experimental conditions,
the amount of CH3ONO2 produced from reaction 13 is roughly
equal to the detection level for CH3ONO2. Thus, the ultimate
lower limit on the value for the branching ratio for reaction 4b
is constrained by both the secondary chemistry from reaction
13 and the sensitivity level of the analytical method used here.
None of our branching ratio experiments indicated the produc-
tion of CH3ONO2 from the CH3O2 + NO reaction. However,
we were able to determine a much improved upper limit for
k4b/(k4a + k4b) of 0.03 at 295 K and 100 Torr. Table 5 compares
(16) Lipson, J. B.; Elrod, M. J.; Beiderhase, T.; Molina, L. T.; Molina,
M. J. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 2665.
(17) DeMore, W. B.; Sander, S. P.; Howard, C. J.; Ravishankara, A.
R.; Golden, D. M.; Kolb, C. E.; Hampson, R. F.; Kurylo, M. J.; Molina,
M. J. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric
Modeling; JPL Publication 97-4; Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena,
California, 1997.
Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersberg, Maryland, 1999.
(19) Cheung, Y.-S.; Li, W.-K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 223, 383.
the previously indirectly determined upper limits for k4b/(k4a
+
k4b) with the value determined here. It is clear that our value
for k4b/(k4a + k4b) places a much tighter constraint on the amount
of CH3ONO2 that can be formed from the CH3O2 + NO
reaction. Because our temperature-dependent results for the