Upper Excited State Photochemistry
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 13, 1999 3091
wave functions comprising each eigenvector were identified from the
calculated UV spectrum. The 400 electron spin up, singly excited
configurations contributing to each wave function were identified from
the CI matrix, squared, multiplied by 2 (to account for the spin down
electrons), and multiplied by 100 to convert to a percentage.
Ground-state MO calculations were conducted using Gaussian 94.40
All geometries were optimized at the HF/6-31G27 level of theory.
Frequency calculations at this level showed the s-trans and gauche
rotamers to be minima while the s-cis rotamer was shown to be a
maximum. Energy differences between the conformers are the HF
energies.
lifetimes. Isolation of ring expansion products in the gas phase
provides evidence of a biradical reactive state, the origin of
which is either S2 or S1vib. There is also unexpected ring
expansion chemistry of 2CPI in solution, accompanied by a
significant diminution in transposition chemistry. This suggests
that S1 also has diradical character. Rates of ring opening in S1
in solution are 2.9 × 109 and 9.2 × 108 s-1 for 2CPI and 3CPI,
respectively. The photochemistry and photophysics of 2CPI are
governed by an s-trans h gauche conformational equilibrium,
with ring expansion likely to be occurring preferentially from
the gauche rotamer. This rotamer dominates the equilibrium in
the gas phase, while the s-trans rotamer is prevalent in solution.
The wavelength-dependent effects observed for photochemistry
and fluorescence of 2CPI in solution are consistent with either
S2 decaying to S1 prior to reaction or emission or S2 photo-
chemistry competing with internal conversion to the lower
excited state.
Solution Phase Photochemistry. Experiments were done with
matched quartz tubes (1 cm o.d.) in a Rayonet Model RPR-100 reactor
(New England Ultraviolet Company) equipped with two or four 254
nm low-pressure mercury lamps or with laser light sources. Quantum
efficiencies at 254 nm were measured using 1-phenyl-2-butene acti-
nometry41 with column A (80 °C) to analyze the E/Z isomerization.
The E isomer (Aldrich) was purified by GLC using column B (100
°C). All solution experiments were conducted in cyclohexane and
degassed with argon for 30 min prior to photolysis. Photolyses
conducted at 266 nm were performed using a Continuum NY-61 Nd:
YAG laser equipped with a frequency quadrupler (10 Hz, 3.0-3.3 mJ/
pulse). Irradiations at 280 and 250 nm employed a YAG-pumped dye
laser (Continuum ND-60, Rhodamine 590 or Coumarin 500, respec-
tively). A 2× beam enlarger was used in front of the photolysis cell to
avoid cell damage. Singlet lifetimes were collected using either a time-
correlated photon counting apparatus with 266 nm excitation from a
frequency quadrupled mode locked Quantronix Nd:YAG laser with a
pulse width of fwhm 120 ps or using a PTI LS-1 spectrophotometer
exciting with either 254 or 266 nm light.
Gas Phase Photochemistry. The apparatus has been described in
detail elsewhere.3a Exploratory and preparative experiments were
performed under flowing conditions. Briefly, a liquid sample was
distilled (typically at pressures of 20 mTorr at 25 °C) through a quartz
tube (33 cm in length × 14.7 cm in circumference) surrounded by
sixteen 254 nm low-pressure mercury lamps. The photolyzed vapor
was collected in a liquid nitrogen trap. After warming to room
temperature, the trap was washed twice with 10 mL of pentane and
the combined washings were concentrated under a stream of nitrogen.
Exploratory experiments utilized 10-20 mg of the appropriate indene,
while preparative work employed 30-300 mg. Isolation of photoprod-
ucts employed either silica gel chromatography (hexane as eluent) or
separation by GLC using column B.
Qualitative and quenching studies were performed under static
conditions which involved filling a cylindrical quartz vessel (length
34 cm × 4.7 cm o.d.) with the desired vapor to pressures of 150-800
mTorr, depending on the indene. Unless otherwise noted, the pressures
were not corrected for instrument response. The vessel was removed
from the vacuum line and placed in a modified RPR-100 Rayonet
reactor containing one 254 nm lamp for photolysis times of 5-15 s at
25 °C. Collection of the photolyzed sample required immersion of the
vessel in liquid nitrogen and the injection of 5 mL of pentane containing
an internal standard. After the vessel warmed to room temperature,
the solution was removed and the vessel was again washed with
pentane. The combined pentane washings were concentrated under a
stream of nitrogen and analyzed on column A (120 °C). The gas phase
apparatus was designed with apertures to allow the introduction of a
Experimental Section
Materials. Diethyl ether was dried over sodium/benzophenone prior
to use. Cyclopropyl bromide (Aldrich, Lancaster), 1-indanone (Aldrich),
and iodomethane (Aldrich) were used as received. 2-Indanone (Aldrich)
was purified by flash chromatography (CH2Cl2) and recrystallized from
hexane. Spectranalyzed cyclohexane (Fisher) was used for all spectro-
scopic and photochemical studies. Naphthalene was purified by the
method of Perrin.36 (E)-1-Phenyl-2-butene (Aldrich) was purified by
GLC prior to use.
Instrumentation. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained using
Varian Gemini 200 MHz or Varian 500 MHz spectrometers. Chemical
shifts are reported in deuteriochloroform in parts per million relative
to tetramethylsilane (TMS) or residual chloroform. For the variable-
temperature 1H NMR experiments GLC pure 2CPI and 2MI was
dissolved in deuteriochloroform or deuteriohexane and analyzed at 2
and 25 °C utilizing the Varian 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with
a cryostatically controlled temperature unit. These samples were ca.
e5% v/v in the solvents used.
Mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan 4000 mass spectrometer
interfaced to a gas chromatograph containing either packed or capillary
columns. Electron impact (EI) and chemical ionization (CI) mass spectra
were recorded at 70 eV. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded
on a Kratos Model MS-50 instrument operated at 70 eV for EI.
Ultraviolet absorption spectra were collected in matched 1 cm2 quartz
cells using a Cary 100 spectrometer interfaced to a Pentium 100 MHz
PC controlled by the Cary Scan Package software. Corrected steady
state fluorescence and excitation spectra were recorded on an SLM
Aminco Model SPF-500 C spectrofluorometer using the A/B mode in
all experiments. Low-temperature fluorescence spectra were collected
using a liquid nitrogen cooled Dewar equipped with a quartz window.
Analytical GLC was performed on Varian Model 3700 FID and Varian
Model 3500 FID capillary gas chromatographs with Hewlett-Packard
3390A digital integrators. Preparative GLC was performed on a Varian
Model 3300 TCD gas chromatograph with a Hewlett-Packard 3390A
digital integrator. Two columns were used: A (J & W DB-1, 15 m ×
0.25 mm id., 0.25 µm) and B (10 ft × 0.25 in, 5% OV-17 on
Chromosorb W).
Computations. Excited state calculations were performed using the
HyperChem 5.0 (Hypercube Inc.) program package. Geometries of the
indenes were optimized in Cs symmetry using the AM137 or ZINDO/
138 Hamiltonians. The molecular orbital plots were generated from
ZINDO/S-CI39 calculations using 20 occupied and 20 unoccupied
orbitals. The multiplicity of each eigenvector (excited state) was
determined from the state dipole moments. All the single determinant
(39) (a) Ridley, J.; Zerner, M. C. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 32, 111-
134. (b) Ridley, J.; Zerner, M. C. Theor. Chim. Acta 1976, 42, 223-236.
(c) Zerner, M. C.; Loew, G. H.; Kirchner, R. F.; Mueller-Westerhoff, U. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 589-599.
(40) M. J. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T.; Petersson, G.
A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrzewski,
V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; J. Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.;
Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.; Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-
Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA,
1995.
(36) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals, 2nd ed.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1980; pp 349-
350.
(37) Dewar, M. J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909.
(38) (a) Bacon, A. D.; Zerner, M. C. Theor. Chim. Acta. 1979, 53, 21-
54. (b) Anderson, W. P.; Edwards, W. D.; Zerner, M. C. Inorg. Chem.
1986, 25, 2728-2732.
(41) Morrison, H.; Pajak, J.; Peiffer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93,
3978-3985.