E46
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 150 ͑1͒ E39-E46 ͑2003͒
2. C. R. Martin, L. D. Whiteley, D. R. Lawson, and M. N. Szentirmay, Polym. Prepr.
(Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem.), 29, 442 ͑1988͒.
3. A. K. Shukla, P. Stevens, A. Hamnett, and J. B. Goodenough, J. Appl. Electro-
chem., 19, 383 ͑1989͒.
4. F. A. Uribe, T. E. Springer, and S. Gottesfeld, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 765
͑1992͒.
5. S. Gottesfeld, I. D. Raistrick, and S. Srinivasan, J. Electrochem. Soc., 134, 1455
͑1987͒.
6. Kinetics and Mechanisms of Electrode Processes Vol. 7, M. R. Tarasevich, A.
Sadkowski, and E. B. Yeager, Editors Plenum Press, New York ͑1983͒.
7. R. Adzic, in Electrocatalysis, J. Lipkoswki and P. N. Ross, Editors, p. 197, Wiley-
VCH, Inc., New York ͑1998͒.
8. A. J. Dickman, AMD (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.), 40, 337 ͑2000͒.
9. A. J. Appleby, Sci. Am., 281, 74 ͑1999͒.
used to connect the main reactor chamber to an external compart-
ment that houses the reference electrode. During operation, the so-
lution in the main reactor chamber which contains the high area Pt is
agitated continuously by bubbling Ar gas.
For these preliminary experiments, the reactor was filled first
with a 20 mM H2SO4 solution and a cyclic voltammogram recorded
after deaeration yielded features characteristic of clean Pt ͑not
shown͒. The potential of the Pt foil was then stepped from ϩ0.74 V
s. SHE ͑platinum-oxide-free͒ to the desired potential Edep and held
v
at that value while recording the current for ca. 80 s, a time suffi-
cient for the current to reach steady state. Immediately thereafter, the
electrode was stepped back to ϩ0.74 V for a few minutes and then
stepped to a new Edep value. Shown in Fig. 15 ͑open circles͒ are
plots of the charge obtained from integration of the steady-state
background current as a function of potential. Once the entire series
was completed, 0.40 mg Pt black was added into the cell and the
same type of experiments repeated yielding the results shown in
solid circles in the same figure.
10. C. K. Dyer, Sci. Am., 281, 88 ͑1999͒.
11. S. R. Narayanan, T. I. Valdez, and F. Clara, in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells, S. R.
Narayanan, S. Gottesfeld, and T. Zawodzinski, Editors, PV 2001-4, p. 254, The
Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ ͑2001͒.
12. P. C. Foller and R. T. Bombard, J. Appl. Electrochem., 25, 613 ͑1995͒.
13. P. Piela and P. K. Wrona, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 1494 ͑2001͒.
14. A. Alvarez-Gallegos and D. Pletcher, Electrochim. Acta, 44, 853 ͑1998͒.
15. K. B. Lee, M. B. Gu, and S.-H. Moon, Eng. Life Sci., 1, 237 ͑2001͒.
16. P. Tatapudi and J. M. Fenton, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, L55 ͑1993͒.
17. R. P. Sethi, B. K. Rao, and D. Srinivas, Chem. Ind. Dig., 14, 95 ͑2001͒.
18. F. P. Komarov, Bum. Prom., , 11 ͑1969͒.
The solution was then replaced by deaerated 1 mM SeO2 ϩ 20
mM H2SO4 solution and the potential stepped from ϩ 0.84 to
ϩ 0.54 V s. SHE while monitoring the current ͑see dotted line in
v
Fig. 16͒. Immediately thereafter, 0.40 mg Pt black ͑Alfa͒ was added
19. M. Ficek and M. Ficek, Chemik, 47, 9 ͑1994͒.
and the potential stepped from ϩ0.84 to ϩ0.54 V s. SHE yielding
v
20. J. Zagal, P. Bindra, and E. Yeager, J. Electrochem. Soc., 127, 1506 ͑1980͒.
21. N. Kobayashi, T. Matsue, M. Fujihira, and T. Osa, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
Electrochem., 103, 427 ͑1979͒.
22. A. Bettelheim, R. J. H. Chan, and T. Kuwana, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
Electrochem., 99, 391 ͑1979͒.
23. A. Bettelheim, R. J. H. Chan, and T. Kuwana, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
Electrochem., 110, 93 ͑1980͒.
24. P. A. Forshey, T. Kuwana, N. Kobayashi, and T. Osa, in Advances in Chemistry
Series, K. M. Kadish, Editor, Vol. 201, ACS, Washington, DC, ͑1982͒.
25. F. Beck, J. Appl. Electrochem., 7, 239 ͑1977͒.
26. T. Harrington and D. Pletcher, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146, 2983 ͑1999͒.
27. K. Fukatsu, S. Kokot, and D. P. Schweinsberg, Text. Res. J., 69, 769 ͑1999͒.
28. D. A. Scherson, Patent ͑2002͒, In press.
29. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Ap-
plications, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York ͑2001͒.
30. Y. E. Sung, W. Chrzanowski, A. Zolfaghari, G. Jerkiewicz, and A. Wieckowski, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 194 ͑1997͒.
31. Y.-E. Sung, W. Chrzanowski, A. Wieckowski, A. Zolfaghari, S. Blais, and G. Jerk-
iewicz, Electrochim. Acta, 44, 1019 ͑1998͒.
the charge s. time curve shown in Fig. 16 ͑solid line͒. As indicated,
v
the charge difference between the Pt black and the foil is larger in
the presence compared to the absence of Se in solution, and there-
fore consistent with the adsorption of Se on the Pt black surface.
Unfortunately, the amounts of Se-modified Pt that could be prepared
with this minireactor were found to be too small to carry out mean-
ingful electrocatalytic experiments. However, high activities and se-
lectivities for the reduction of dioxygen to hydrogen peroxide in
acid electrolytes were observed recently in our laboratory for high
area Pt particles embedded on the surface of a glassy carbon rotating
disk electrode modified by Se in situ,37 providing clear evidence that
the effects observed for massive Pt can indeed be reproduced for the
technically more relevant Pt blacks.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a contract from CAMP.
32. J. M. Feliu, R. Gomez, M. J. Llorca, and A. Aldaz, Surf. Sci., 289, 152 ͑1993͒.
33. B. M. Huang, T. E. Lister, and J. L. Stickney, Surf. Sci., 392, 27 ͑1997͒.
34. T. E. Lister and J. L. Stickney, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 19568 ͑1996͒.
35. B. W. Gregory, M. L. Norton, and J. L. Stickney, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
Electrochem., 293, 85 ͑1990͒.
Case Western Reserve University assisted in meeting the publication
costs of this article.
References
36. S. L. Gojkovic, S. Gupta, and R. F. Savinell, Electrochim. Acta, 45, 889 ͑1999͒.
37. Y. Mo, S. Sarangapani, A. Le, and D. A. Scherson, In press.
1. H. Y. Liu and F. C. Anson, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 158, 181
͑1983͒.
Downloaded on 2015-06-29 to IP 140.112.4.67 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).