D. Watanabe et al.
Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 214 (2018) 1–7
2
2
.3. Fluorination reaction of antimony compounds
decrease of ΔM was observed above 190 °C especially; decrease of ΔM
seemed to be delayed from start of the exothermic reaction. Therefore,
.3.1. Fluorination reaction of antimony metal
it was considered as main fluorination reaction of SbF
3
, which was
As mentioned in Section 2.1.1, three reactions were observed in the
given as reaction (2), was exothermic peaks above 190 °C.
TG-DTA curves shown in Fig. 1; exothermic reaction with mass increase
at 150 °C, exothermic reaction with mass decrease at 190 °C, and re-
action with slight mass decrease at 330 °C. These reactions were clearly
observed in Fig. 1(c) because the fluorination reactions could be se-
parately observed at slow heating rate. And as shown in Fig. 2, the
residue of fluorination reaction at 500 °C was antimony metal, and that
The shoulder of the exothermic peak at 150 °C in Fig. 3(a) and the
exothermic peak at 150 °C in Fig. 3(b) was observed with or without
slightly mass increase; this exothermic peak was obscure for Fig. 3(c).
Colbin [14] suggested some addition compounds consisted by SbF
SbF . Since the change of ΔM was small, exothermic reaction may
fluorination reaction to produce such addition compounds.
3
and
5
at 170 °C was antimony metal and SbF
confirmed that fluorination reaction of antimony metal at 150 °C and
3
. Based on these result, it is
In main fluorination reaction above 190 °C, two or three exothermic
peaks was observed in Fig. 3 (c). Since the heat production was large in
the fluorination reaction because the valence state of antimony was
oxidized to pentavalent from trivalent, the temperature may be in-
creased locally by heat production of the fluorination reaction as same
as the fluorination reaction of antimony metal. In such condition,
1
90 °C were described by reactions (1) and (2).
/3Sb + F → 2/3SbF
+ F → SbF
As shown in Fig. 3, the fluorination reaction of SbF
2
2
3
(1)
(2)
SbF
3
2
5
3 3 5
fluorination of SbF and volatilization of SbF and SbF would be
3
with drastic
concurrently occurred; it meant that some phenomena were con-
currently occurred. Because of these phenomena, it may be considered
that some sharp exothermic peaks were found above 190 °C in Fig. 3.
Additionally, decrease of ΔM was delayed from start of the exothermic
reaction around 190 °C, this may be caused by balancing of volatiliza-
decrease of ΔM was observed at 190 °C which was same temperature of
second exothermic reaction shown in Fig. 1(c). This result would be
support the idea that the exothermic reaction at 190 °C in Fig. 1 was
reaction (2).
−1
The vapor pressure of SbF
50 °C by the calculation using a thermodynamic data base [16], and
that of SbF has been reported as 100 kPa at 142.7 °C [1]. Namely, SbF
has low volatility at 150 °C, and SbF has high volatility at that tem-
perature. And in 150 °C, SbF did not volatilize as shown in Fig. 4.
Therefore, the temporary increase of ΔM at 150 °C in Fig. 1(c) would be
caused by the formation of SbF . Then, ΔM should be +47% when
reaction (1) completed without volatilization of SbF . However, ΔM
3
was evaluated as about 10
kPa at
5
tion of SbF and formation of addition compounds, which was men-
tioned in previous paragraph.
1
5
3
As same as the case of antimony metal, ΔM seemed to decrease
slightly over 330 °C in Fig. 3. It would be caused by fluorination reac-
tion of few amount of antimony oxide. And, in TG-DTA curves in Fig. 3,
exothermic peaks were not separately observed each other at high
heating rate, however, the shape of TG-DTA curves were seemed to be
resembled. It is considered that heating rate would not affect to the
5
3
3
3
was +13% as maximum in Fig. 1(c). From this view point, in Fig. 1(c),
metal antimony would be remained at 180 °C which was finish tem-
perature of initial fluorination reaction. On the other hand, ΔM started
3
fluorination reaction of SbF .
2
.3.3. Fluorination reaction of Sb
Sb was volatilized by the fluorination reaction above 330 °C as
shown in Fig. 5. Since antimony is pentavalent in Sb , antimony
2 5
O
to decrease above 180 °C in Fig. 1(c). At 180 °C, vapor pressure of SbF
3
2 5
O
3
was 0.2 kPa [16], and SbF did not volatilize as shown in Fig. 4. Since
2 5
O
fluorination reaction was large exothermic reaction, temperature of
local place such as the interface of gas-solid reaction may be increased
over 180 °C in this experiment. Because of this reason, antimony metal
cannot be further oxidized to a higher valence state even by the
fluorination reaction. Reduction of antimony also cannot occur by the
fluorination reaction. Therefore, the fluorination reaction is considered
as reaction (3).
started to volatilize at 180 °C as SbF
SbF started above 190 °C, decrease of ΔM stopped from 190 °C to
20 °C in Fig. 1(c). As mentioned in more detail section 2.3.2, it would
be caused by balancing of volatilization of SbF and formation of ad-
, which was suggested by
3 5
or SbF . After the fluorination of
3
2
1/5Sb
2
O
5
+ F
2
→ 2/5SbF
5
+ 1/2O
2
(3)
5
dition compounds consisted by SbF
Colbin [14].
3 5
and SbF
As mentioned in section 1, formation of oxyfluoride should be in-
vestigated for the fluorination reaction of oxide materials. Colbin [14]
suggested antimony oxyfluorides such as SbO F, and SbOF . The de-
In the XRD pattern of residue of fluorination reaction of antimony
metal at 500 °C shown in Fig. 2(a), only antimony metal peaks were
2
3
composition reactions of antimony oxyfluorides were suggested as re-
actions (4) and (5) [14].
detected. SbF
dicates that metal antimony would be fluorinated to SbF
90 °C. Therefore, it was considered that SbF peaks were not detected
3
was fluorinated to volatile SbF
5
above 190 °C. It in-
5
directly above
5
SbO
2
F → 2Sb
2
O
4
+ SbF
5
5
+ O
2
(4)
(5)
1
3
and only antimony metal peaks were detected in the XRD pattern of
Fig. 2(a).
In Fig. 1(c), ΔM slightly decreased over 330 °C. As shown in
2
Figs. 5–7, antimony oxides started to react with F above 330 °C. The
XRD pattern of starting material of antimony metal indicated only an-
timony metal, however, the surface of starting material may be already
oxidized. Since the decrease of ΔM was slight at 330 °C in Fig. 1(c), it
was considered that the reaction would be fluorination reaction of
antimony oxide such as oxidized surface of antimony metal.
In TG-DTA curves in Fig. 1, exothermic peaks were not separately
observed each other at high heating rate, however, the shape of TG-
DTA curves were seemed to be resembled. It is considered that heating
rate would not affect to the fluorination reaction of antimony metal.
5SbOF
3
→ Sb
2
O
4
+ 3SbF
+ 1/2O
2
The reaction temperatures of reactions (4) and (5) were reported as
50 °C and 200 °C, respectively [14]. SbO F seemed to be relatively
stable at 330 °C which was the reaction temperature of the fluorination
3
2
of Sb
Sb
2
O
5
. Therefore, SbO
2
F was considered as a potential intermediate.
2
O
5
may be fluorinated to SbF
5
via SbO
2
F according to reactions (6)
and (7).
Sb + F
/2SbO F + F
2
O
5
2
→ 2SbO
2
F + 1/2O
2
(6)
(7)
1
2
2
5 2
→ 1/2SbF + 1/2O
However, the TG-DTA curve was looked as that Sb
by one step reaction. Therefore, if SbO F were formed by reaction (6),
SbO F would be immediately fluorinated to SbF by reaction (7).
The residue of fluorination reaction of Sb could not be identified.
The residue of fluorination experiment of Sb and Sb was oxide
compound, which was Sb
2 5
O was reacted
2
2
5
2
.3.2. Fluorination reaction of SbF
As shown in Fig. 3, several exothermic peaks were observed in the
TG-DTA curves. However, the exothermic reaction with drastic
3
2
O
5
2
O
3
2 4
O
2 4
O . Abe et al. [18] suggested amorphous
5