574
F.-Q. Dong et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 476 (2009) 571–574
4. Conclusion
In summary, BaWO4 crystals with tetragonal structure were syn-
thesized by SLM system at room temperature. The morphologies
and sizes of BaWO4 crystals could be controlled through adding
different reagents into SLM system, which could be further mod-
ified by adjusting additive reagents’ concentration and reaction
time. The as-synthesized BaWO4 crystals had some potential appli-
cations because of their excellent blue-shift luminescence. This
method was important to widen biomineralization field, and also
provided a new route for materials’ control synthesis.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support of the National Natu-
ral Science Foundation (No. 50772074) of China, the State Major
Research Plan (973) of China (No. 2006CB932302), and the Nano-
Foundation of Shanghai in China (No. 0852nm01200).
Fig. 5. PL spectra of as-prepared BaWO4 crystals (ex = 300 nm).
figuration was different. EDTA was like two pincers of a crab. Citric
acid was just like a triangle taper whose bottom was an isosce-
les triangle [23]. Ethylenediamine was like a linear-shape. When
carboxylic group or amido group was chelated with Ba2+ under
coordination or electrostatic effect, the single bonding in the chain
nearby would rotate to get the lowest energy, which resulted in
different inhibition of space matching. In other words, the above-
mentioned differences gave rise to the diversity on the degree
and position of crystal plane development. Their difference led to
the morphology change certainly; the effect was due to molecular
recognition, space structure complement, or static effect. There-
fore, the product’s morphology was rod-shape under the present
of ethylenediamine, which was also reported in the literature [24].
On the other hand, the product’s morphology was complex under
the present of EDTA and citric acid.
References
[1] H. Colfen, S.H. Yu, MRS Bull. 30 (2005) 727–735.
[2] W.T. Yao, S.H. Yu, L. Pan, J. Li, Q.S. Wu, L. Zhang, J. Jiang, Small 1 (2005) 320–
325.
[3] M. Li, H. Schnablegger, S. Mann, Nature (London) 402 (1999) 393–395.
[4] J.P. Ge, S. Xu, J. Zhuang, X. Wang, Q. Peng, Y.D. Li, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2006)
[5] V. Thangadurai, C. Knittlmayer, W. Weppner, Mater. Sci. Eng. B: Solid B 106
(2004) 228–233.
[6] Z. Wang, X.F. Qian, J. Yin, Z.K. Zhu, Langmuir 20 (2004) 3441–3448.
[7] Y. Jiang, Y.J. Zhu, Z.L. Xu, Mater. Lett. 60 (2006) 2294–2298.
[8] F.M. Pontes, M.A. Maurera, M.A. Souza, A.G. Longo, E. Leite, E.R. Magnani,
R. Machado, M.A.C. Pizani, P.S. Varela, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 23 (2003) 3001–
3007.
[9] J.K. Liu, Q.S. Wu, Y.P. Ding, Cryst. Growth Des. 5 (2005) 445–449.
[10] W.W. Ge, H.J. Zhang, J.Y. Wang, J.H. Liu, X.G. Xu, X.B. Hu, J. Li, M.H. Jiang, J. Cryst.
Growth 270 (2004) 582–588.
[11] G.X. Zhang, R.P. Jia, Q.S. Wu, Mater. Sci. Eng. B: Solid B 128 (2006) 254–
259.
[12] H.T. Shi, X.H. Wang, N.N. Zhao, L.M. Qi, J.M. Ma, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006)
748–753.
[13] D. Li, H. Wu, Z. Li, X.F. Cong, J. Sun, Z.H. Ren, L.P. Liu, Y. Li, D.W. Fan, J.C. Hao,
Colloids Surf. A 274 (2006) 18–23.
[14] X. Zhang, Y. Xie, F. Xu, X.B. Tian, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 274 (2004) 118–121.
[15] J.H. Ryu, J.W. Yoon, K.B. Shim, Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 8 (2005) D15–
D18.
[16] W.S. Cho, M. Yoshimura, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1997) 2199–2204.
[17] Q.S. Wu, D.M. Sun, H.I. Liu, Y.P. Ding, Cryst. Growth Des. 4 (2004) 717.
[18] F.Q. Dong, Q.S. Wu, D.M. Sun, Y.P. Ding, J. Mater. Sci. 43 (2008) 641–644.
[19] F.Q. Dong, Q.S. Wu, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. 91 (2008) 161–165.
[20] A.P. Alivisatos, Science 289 (2000) 736–737.
[21] B. Liu, S.H. Yu, L.J. Li, Q. Zhang, F. Zhang, K. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004)
4745–4750.
[22] J. Silver, M.I. Martinez-Rubio, T.G. Ireland, G.R. Fern, R. Withnall, J. Phys. Chem.
B 105 (2001) 948–953.
[23] D.M. Sun, Q.S. Wu, H.I. Liu, Y.P. Ding, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39 (2006) 544–
549.
[24] J.H. Zeng, J. Yang, Y.T. Qian, Mater. Res. Bull. 36 (2001) 343–348.
[25] G.J. Zhou, M.K. Lv, Z.L. Xiu, S.F. Wang, H.P. Zhang, W.G. Zou, J. Cryst. Growth 276
(2005) 116–120.
was prolonged, the crystals began self-assembly to grow bigger
crystal with a lot of substructure [25], which also could be referred
to the results of Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 shows the fluorescence spectra of the as-prepared BaWO4
crystals with the additive reagent of 3 mL of 0.01 M EDTA for 48 h
at 300 nm, whereas those of BaWO4 nanospheres with diameter of
500 nm were at 387 nm and 460 nm [26]. This might be attributed
to the quantum size effect or crystalline imperfection and disorder
[23]. From the XRD data in Fig. 1(b), the average crystallite size cal-
culated from Scherrer’s formula was 46 nm. We supposed that the
as-prepared BaWO4 crystals were self-assembled by nanoparticles,
which was in good agreement with the proposed growth mecha-
nism and the calculated results of XRD data. The as-synthesized
BaWO4 crystals with excellent blue-shift of luminescence might be
have some potential applications in photoelectric filed and device
design.
[26] G.J. Zhou, M.K. Lv, F. Gu, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 2706–2709.