V.C. Birar, G. Zaid and Brian S.J. Blagg
Tetrahedron Letters 73 (2021) 153139
Scheme 1. Synthesis of dimeric harmaline analogs and proposed modifications.
and benzaldehyde (3) were selected to react with harmaline in an
effort to determine the role played by substituents on the aldehyde
linker. Vanillin was chosen because it exhibits well known antiox-
idant and anti-proliferative activities [6]. Initially, our hypothesis
was that the methoxy and hydroxyl substituents on vanillin might
be critical for anti-proliferative activity, and therefore we prepared
the unsubstituted harmaline dimer containing benzaldehyde as a
linker. We also synthesized dimeric analogs to determine the role
played by the linker and to optimize the tether length between the
two harmaline moieties. The harmaline ring system (1) was also
investigated to determine the requisite substituents for the quino-
line and iso-quinoline ring systems and to evaluate the role played
by each. In total, eleven new analogs were prepared, evaluated, and
initial SAR determined for this scaffold. Formation of these prod-
ucts required a condensation reaction between two harmaline
molecules and an aldehyde in methanol to form the desired prod-
ucts. Nucleophilic addition of the harmaline enamine to the alde-
hyde resulted in formation of hydroxyl intermediate (I), which
underwent subsequent nucleophilic attack by the enamine of a
second harmaline to give the dimeric compounds (Scheme 2).
Although other solvents were explored, methanol was found to
provide the best yield for this reaction.
The same procedure was also utilized to synthesize dimeric
analogs of harmaline with vanillin and benzaldehyde (Scheme 3,
analogs 4 and 5). The next objective was to determine the effect
of an aliphatic linker and to determine the optimal linker length
based on the resulting biological activity. Previously identified con-
ditions were not suitable for the reaction between dialdehydes
(gloxal, malondialdehyde bis(dimethyl acetal) or succinaldehyde
bis(dimethyl acetal)) and harmaline. Therefore, the synthetic route
was modified for the utilization of carboxylic acid linkers wherein
two, three or four methylene units were included (Scheme 3).
Tryptamine 18 was coupled with the corresponding diacid using
an amide coupling reaction to give the diamide products 19a-e,
which were subjected to a Bischler–Napieralski reaction to give
dimeric analogs 6, 7 and 8, which contain three and four methylene
units, respectively. Unfortunately, the cyclization process was not
successful for linkers bearing none, one or two methylene units,
which is consistent with earlier reports and reflects the strain
introduced during cyclization [7]. The in vitro cytotoxicity of com-
pounds 4–10, 12, and 15–17 against various human cancer cells
was evaluated using an MTT assay. Three pancreatic cancer cell
lines (MIA PaCa-2, ASPC-1, BxPC-3), two endometrial cancer cell
lines (AN3CA, HEC-1a), three triple negative breast cancer cell lines
(MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, HCC70), two lung cancer cell lines
(H1975, H1650 both EGFR mut), two ovarian cancer cell lines
(A2780, A2780CP), a renal cancer cell line (A498), two cervical,
H&N cancer cell lines (SiHA, FaDu), two B-cell lymphoma cancer
cell lines (DoHH-2, OCI-LY3), and six myeloma cancer cell lines
(JIM1, KMM-1, KMS-34, RPMI-8226, L363 and MOLP-8) were used.
The IC50 values (effective concentration inhibiting 50% of tumor
cell proliferation) are listed in Table 1.
We evaluated the activity of 4–10, 12, and 15–17 against various
human cancer cells and all of them demonstrated growth inhibi-
tion. Compounds 4 and 5 displayed cancer cell growth inhibition
at 4–7 mM, which is more potent than harmaline and vanillin (25
and 40 mM for harmaline and vanillin, respectively). The data also
revealed the hydroxyl and methoxy groups present in 4 and 9 are
not required for activity, which was confirmed via compounds 5
and 10, which lack these moieties but continue to inhibit cancer cell
growth at similar concentrations (IC50 2–4 mM). In addition, reduc-
tion of the imine in analogs 4 and 5 to the corresponding secondary
Scheme 2. Formation of dimeric harmaline analogs and the ORTEP diagram of 4.
2