C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3
trans-fused ring system. The conformational bias imposed by
embedding the C10 stereocenter in a rigid lactone likely minimizes
the entropic penalty associated with macrocyclization. Unfortu-
nately, circumstantial evidence convinced us that the newly formed
C2 hydroxyl (20) possessed the incorrect relative stereochemistry,
a conclusion born out by subsequent transformations. In particular,
Dess-Martin oxidation provided an intermediate enone. Reduction
with the reagent derived from 1:1 mixture of (iBu)2AlH and tBuLi
produced an allylic alcohol displaying spectroscopic data consistent
with the desired C2 stereochemistry (21).13 In contrast, reduction
with NaBH4/CeCl3, CBS catalyst, and Li(OtBu)3AlH returned the
original diastereomer (20) while the Selectrides favored 1,4 addition.
Reductive opening of the lactone and selective acylation of the
primary alcohol led to a substrate for epoxidation (22). Concerned
about competition among the three reactive olefins, we reasoned
that the C2 alcohol might deactivate the C3-C4 olefin while the
ketone catalyst 23 might be unreactive toward tetrasubstituted ole-
fins.14 In fact, preliminary studies showed rapid oxidation of all
three olefins with reagents such as mCPBA. Using the Shi catalyst
and oxone, however, oxidation proceeded regio- and stereoselec-
tively to produce the desired epoxide as the major product. Only a
single report has detailed the epoxidation of a macrocyclic olefin
using ketone catalyst 23,15 and we were therefore interested in deci-
phering substrate versus catalyst control. In this regard, substrate
conformation appears to dictate facial preference as both 23 and
ent-23 generated the same product as a single diastereomer. Inter-
estingly, the enantiomeric catalysts displayed slight differences in
olefin preference. Epoxidations employing ketone 23 yielded a 7:1
ratio of monoepoxides, favoring epoxidation of the C7-C8 olefin
over the C3-C4 olefin. In contrast, otherwise identical epoxidations,
save for the use of ent-23, resulted in a 2:1 ratio of the same
epoxides.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge a generous gift of ent-23
from Yian Shi (Colorado State). X-ray analysis was performed by
Radha Akella (UTSW) and Richard Staples (Harvard). Financial
support was from the Welch Foundation and UT Southwestern
(J.M.R. is a Southwestern Medical Foundation Scholar in Biomedi-
cal Research). This investigation was conducted in a facility
constructed with support from the Research Facilities Improvement
Program (C06 RR-15437). M.V.W. was supported by an NIH grant
for undergraduate research fellowships (R25 GM072832-02).
Supporting Information Available: Complete experimental details
and characterization data. This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) Summer Undergraduate Research Fellow.
(2) Rodriguez, A. D.; Gonzalez, E.; Ramirez, C. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
11683-11729.
(3) (a) Miyaoka, H.; Baba, T.; Mitome, H.; Yamada, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 9233-9236. (b) Miyaoka, H.; Isaji, Y.; Mitome, H.; Yamada,
Y. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 61-75. (c) Williams, D. R.; Heidebrecht, R.
W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1843-1850. (d) Kingsbury, J. S.;
Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13813-13815. (e) Snyder, S.
A.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 740-742.
(4) (a) Morikawa, T.; Xu, F.; Kashima, Y.; Matsuda, H.; Ninomiya, K.;
Yoshikawa, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 869-872. (b) Morikawa, T.; Xu, F.;
Ninomiya, K.; Matsuda, H.; Yoshikawa, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004,
52, 494-497.
(5) Reviews on allylic alkylation in natural product synthesis: (a) Trost, B.
M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2921-2943. (b) Helmchen,
G.; Ernst, M.; Paradies, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 495-506.
(6) Pretot, R.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 323-325.
(7) (a) Dawson, G. J.; Frost, C. G.; Williams, J. M. J.; Coote, S. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 3149-3150. (b) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res.
2000, 33, 336-345.
(8) See Supporting Information.
(9) Xiang, J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8597-8600.
(10) Negishi, E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 65-72.
(11) Wipf, P.; Lim, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1068-1071.
(12) (a) Conditions modified from Nicolaou, K. C.; Theodorakis, E. A.; Rutjes,
F. P. J. T.; Tiebes, J.; Sato, M.; Untersteller, E.; Xiao, X.-Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 1171-1172. (b) NHK reaction in synthesis of 5,11-trans-
fused bicycles: Luker, R.; Whitby, R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
7661-7664.
(13) Trost, B. M.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; McElvain, S. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 1328-1330.
(14) Shi, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 488-496.
Finally, acylation of the two secondary alcohols with nicotinic
acid provided ent-nigellamine A2. The synthetic material was fully
1
consistent with the natural product by H NMR, 13C NMR, and
MS analysis. The optical rotation ([R]20D ) +19.6, c ) 0.5 CHCl3)
was opposite in sign and similar in magnitude to that reported for
the natural product ([R]27D ) -24.2, c ) 1.00 CHCl3),16 confirming
the stereochemical assignment made by the Yoshikawa group.
Natural nigellamine A2 was produced from ent-12 following a
sequence analogous to that outlined in Scheme 3.8,17 Minor
modifications of this synthesis should provide other members of
the nigellamine family. Having access to numerous congeners of
both enantiomeric series should facilitate detailed biological studies.
(15) Altmann, K.-H.; Bold, G.; Caravatti, G.; Denni, D.; Florsheimer, A.;
Schmidt, A.; Rihs, G.; Wartmann, M. HelV. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 4086-
4110.
(16) CD (MeOH) showed a positive Cotton effect at 261 nm. Natural 1b shows
a negative Cotton effect at 256 nm.
(17) Diene 10 was cyclized in the presence of a catalyst incorporating ligand
(R)-11.
JA061559N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 23, 2006 7429