Communications
Table 1: N-sulfonyl azetidinimine synthesis: effect of ligands.
lowed by tautomerization, through a sequence proposed
below. Initial cycloaddition of the copper acetylide and
sulfonyl azide would give the (1-sulfonyl-4-phenyltriazol-5-
yl)copper intermediate 2. Direct elimination of dinitrogen, as
previously reported for a range of 5-lithiated-triazoles,[5]
would generate copper alkynamide 3. Protonation of this
species would then furnish the requisite sulfonylketenimine 4
with concomitant liberation of the copper catalyst. Alterna-
tively the cuprated triazole 2 could undergo ring-chain
isomerization, which is known to be rapid for electron-
deficient triazoles, especially those with an electron-with-
drawing group at N-1.[6] This route would give rise to the
cuprated diazoimine 5, which upon loss of dinitrogen and
protonation would again generate the N-sulfonylketenimine 4
and regenerate the copper catalyst (Scheme 2).
Entry
Ligand[a]
t [h]
trans-6:cis-6:7[b]
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
2,6-lutidine
none
pyridine
2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine
neocuproine
Et3N
3
16
3
16
80:13:7
56:11:33
95:5:0
45:10:45
–
94:6:0
83:17:0[c]
42:58:0
no reaction
3
3
<2
TMEDA
TBTA[d]
[a]1 equiv of ligand used. [b]Determined from the 1H NMR spectra of
the crude reaction product. [c]The oxidatively coupled di-alkyne was also
observed. [d]0.1 equiv of ligand used. TMEDA =N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-
ethylenediamine,
amine.
The isolation of 1 was significant in itself, as there are very
few reports of ketenimine dimerization and all proceed across
at least one of the cumulenic C N bonds,[7] as opposed to both
=
TBTA=tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]-
=
C C bonds observed herein. Of greater synthetic interest was
absence of an added ligand and furnished an
increased amount of triazole by-product
(entry 2). The use of pyridine completely
suppressed triazole formation and gave the
desired azetidinimine as a 95:5 ratio of
isomers in favor of the trans product
(entry 3). A number of other ligands were
screened, but all gave a reduction in the
selectivity or the rate of reaction (entries 4–
9). Interestingly TBTA,[10] a potent ligand
for the CuI-catalyzed azide/alkyne cyclo-
addition, not only increased the rate of
azetidinimine formation, but also reversed
the selectivity, giving a slight excess of the
cis isomer (entry 9). The observed depend-
ence of the reaction selectivity upon the
additive is not yet fully understood and is
the subject of continued investigation. It
does however imply that the amine, either
itself directly or as a ligand for copper, is
Scheme 2. Possible mechanistic pathways leading to 1.
the possibility of capturing the N-sulfonylketenimine inter-
mediates by alternative means. Ketenimines with N-alkyl or
-aryl substituents are considerably less reactive than their
oxygen analogues, ketenes, although they are still known to
undergo a range of useful transformations,[7a,8] particularly in
an intramolecular fashion.[7a] Introduction of an N-sulfonyl
substituent leads to a marked increase in reactivity. For
example, N-sulfonylketenimines have been shown by Ghosez
and co-workers to readily undergo intermolecular Staudinger-
type [2+2] cycloadditions with imines to furnish azetidini-
mines.[9]
We were pleased to find that carrying out the reaction in
the presence of N-benzylideneaniline gave the expected
azetidinimine product 6 as a 6:1 mixture of the trans and cis
isomers, along with a small amount of the 1,4-disubstituted
triazole 7 (Table 1, entry 1). The use of alternative ligands/
bases in the reaction gave greatly altered selectivities. For
example, the reaction proceeded much more slowly in the
involved in promotion of the [2+2] process.
Reducing the amount of pyridine resulted in a slight
reduction in the stereoselectivity, while increasing it to two
equivalents gave an even more selective reaction that
furnished the azetidinimine with greater than 95:5 selectivity
in favor of the trans isomer. With regard to the reaction
solvent, more polar solvents tended to give reduced trans:cis
selectivity, and less polar solvents generally required longer
reaction times. None of those tested, however, were as
efficient or resulted in as high a selectivity as acetonitrile.
Under the optimal conditions (1 equiv sulfonyl azide, 2 equiv
pyridine, 1 equiv alkyne, 1.2 equiv imine, 10 mol% CuI, RT,
16 h), 6 was obtained in 90% yield and in greater than 95%
purity by simple dilution of the reaction mixture with 1m HCl
and collection of the precipitated product by filtration
(Table 2, entry 1).
A brief survey of the scope with regard to the alkyne
component revealed that both alkyl and aryl alkynes gave the
3158
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3157 –3161