ChemComm
Communication
thiolates also have strong nucleophilic characteristics reacting
with a weak electrophile such as dichloromethane. Whether the
active nucleophile of this reaction involves a bound thiolate or a
dissociated thiolato ligand is still obscure with the current data.
The kinetic study and theoretic calculation of this chemistry are
undergoing to provide the further mechanistic information.
This work was supported by National Science Council in
Taiwan (NSC 99-2113-M006-004-MY3).
Notes and references
§ Crystal
data
for
1ꢁ0.103CH3OHꢁ0.455THF:
CCDC-895276,
%
C79.93H98.07O0.56P3S6Si6V, M = 1572.52, triclinic, space group P1 (no.
2), a = 13.2824(2) Å, b = 16.9608(3) Å, c = 20.7372(3) Å, a = 80.6212(11)1,
Fig. 4 Variation in UV-vis-NIR spectrum of 1 in CH2Cl2 (3.18 ꢂ 10ꢀ4 M). The
spectrum was taken every 6 hour during a 24 hour time period. Inset: UV-vis-NIR
spectrum of 2 in CH2Cl2.
b = 86.5684(12)1, g = 70.7773(7)1, V = 4352.15(12) Å3, Z = 2, d(calcd)
=
1.200 Mg mꢀ3, T = 150 K, 67094 reflection collected, 19900 indepen-
dent, Rint = 0.0565, R1 = 0.0560, wR2 = 0.1456 for all data. Crystal data for
3: CCDC-895067, C55H74P2S6Si6V, M = 1208.92, monoclinic, space group
P21/c (no. 14), a = 26.551(8) Å, b = 11.965(4) Å, c = 21.288(6) Å, a = 901,
b = 104.2(5)1, g = 901, V = 6556.03(300) Å3, Z = 4, d(calcd) = 1.225 Mg mꢀ3
,
T = 296(2) K, 16135 reflection collected, 7071 independent, Rint = 0.1902,
R1 = 0.0634, wR2 = 0.1151 for all data.
1 J. A. Kovacs, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 825.
2 J. D. Gardner, B. S. Pierce, B. G. Fox and T. C. Brunold, Biochemistry,
2010, 49, 6033.
3 T. Lindahl, Nature, 1993, 362, 709.
4 K. Peariso, Z. S. Zhou, A. E. Smith, R. G. Matthews and J. E. Penner-
Hahn, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 987.
5 D. A. Tobin, J. S. Pickett, H. L. Hartman, C. A. Fierke and
J. E. Penner-Hahn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9962.
6 (a) Q. Wang, A. C. Marr, A. J. Blake, C. Wilson and M. Schroder,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 2776; (b) C. A. Grapperhaus, S. Poturovic and
M. S. Mashuta, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 4309; (c) C.-W. Chang,
Y.-C. Lin, G.-H. Lee and Y. Wang, Organometallics, 2003, 22, 3891;
(d) V. W. W. Yam, P. K. Y. Yeung and K. K. Cheung, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1995, 267; (e) Z. Li, W. Zheng, H. Liu, K. F. Mok and
T. S. A. Hor, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 8481; ( f ) J. R. Bleeke,
M. Shokeen, E. S. Wise and N. P. Rath, Organometallics, 2006,
25, 2486; (g) D. Sellmann, M. Waeber, H. Binder and R. Boese,
Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Section B-a Journal of Chemical Sciences,
1986, 41, 1541; (h) D. C. Fox, A. T. Fiedler, H. L. Halfen, T. C. Brunold
and J. A. Halfen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 7627; (i) M. Gennari,
Fig. 5 1H-NMR spectra of Complex 1 disolved in CD2Cl2 initially (top) and after
24 h (middle). Complex 2 in CD2Cl2 (bottom).
´
M. Retegan, S. DeBeer, J. Pecaut, F. Neese, M.-N. Collomb and
´
C. Duboc, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 10047; ( j) M. Gennari, J. Pecaut,
S. DeBeer, F. Neese, M.-N. Collomb and C. Duboc, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2011, 50, 5662.
of 1 to 2 is marked by an isobestic point at 680 nm. The broad
band appearing around 600 nm to 800 nm in the final spectrum
that is absent in the spectrum of 2 is attributed to the formation
of the minor product, complex 3 (Fig. S2 in the ESI†). This
result was also supported by 1H-NMR spectra, as displayed
in Fig. 5. The spectrum of 1 dissolved in CD2Cl2 exhibits a
broad band at 15–20 ppm initially, but gradually became
smaller and sharper. The broad band at 30–45 ppm was also
7 (a) M. T. Ashby, J. H. Enemark and D. L. Lichtenberger, Inorg. Chem.,
1988, 27, 191; (b) J. Penner-Hahn, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2007,
11, 166; (c) G. Parkin, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 699; (d) D. Picot,
G. Ohanessian and G. Frison, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 8167.
8 M. McKenna, L. L. Wright, D. J. Miller, L. Tanner, R. C. Haltiwanger
and M. R. DuBois, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5329.
9 (a) D. C. Crans, J. J. Smee, E. Gaidamauskas and L. Yang, Chem. Rev.,
2004, 104, 849; (b) D. Rehder, Bioinorganic Vanadium Chemistry; John
Wiley & Sons, 2008.
10 T. Ueki and H. Michibata, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2011, 255, 2249–2257.
more pronounced. The final spectrum after 24 hours displayed 11 C. D. Garner, E. M. Armstrong, R. E. Berry, R. L. Beddoes, D. Collison,
J. J. A. Cooney, S. N. Ertok and M. Helliwell, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2000,
features similar to that of 2 dissolved in CD2Cl2.
80, 17.
In conclusion, this work demonstrated that a VIII thiolate
¨
12 (a) D. Wang, A. Behrens, M. Farahbakhsh, J. Gatjens and D. Rehder,
complex, 1, can activate a C–Cl bond in dichloromethane
via the sulfur-based nucleophilicity. The reaction led to the
formation of a major product containing a chloride bound
donor and a minor one with a ligand containing a methylene-
bridged thioether core. As such chemistry is often reported for
the late-transition metal thiolate complexes, our results give an
Chem.–Eur. J., 2003, 9, 1805; (b) H.-F. Hsu, C.-L. Su, N. O. Gopal,
C.-C. Wu, W.-C. Chu, Y.-F. Tsai, Y.-H. Chang, Y.-H. Liu, T.-S. Kuo and
S.-C. Ke, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 1161; (c) C. R. Cornman,
T. C. Stauffer and P. D. Boyle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 5986;
(d) Y.-H. Chang, C.-L. Su, R.-R. Wu, J.-H. Liao, Y.-H. Liu and
H.-F. Hsu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 5708.
13 R. M. Jenkins, T. A. Pinder, M. L. Hatley, J. H. Reibenspies and
M. Y. Darensbourg, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 1849.
implication that sulfur donors in the early-transition metal 14 W.-C. Chu, C.-C. Wu and H.-F. Hsu, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 3164.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1109--1111 1111