7300
C. Basheer et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 7297–7300
1
0. Quantitative determination of Suzuki
coupling reaction
5. Wang, J.;Rivas, G.;Cai, X.;Palecek, E.;Nielsen, P.;
Shirashi, H.;Dontha, N.;Luo, D.;Parrado, C.;Chic-
harro, M.;Farias, P. A. M.;Valera, F. S.;Grant, D. H.;
Ozsoz, M.;Flair, M. N. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 347, 1–8.
. Chen, S. H.;Gallo, J. M. Electrophoresis 1998, 19,
To evaluate the reaction yield, the optimum reaction
conditions (reaction time of 40min, pH12 and applied
potential of 5kV) were used with a 5cm long capil-
lary-microreactor. Representative results are summa-
rized in Table 1. Compared with conventional
synthesis, the capillary-microreactor provided higher
reaction yields.
6
7
2
861–2869.
. Widmer, H. M. A Survey of the Trends in Analytical
Chemistry over the Last Twenty Years, Emphasizing the
Development of TAS and lTAS. In Proceedings of the 2nd
International Symposium on Miniaturized Total Analysis
Systems, lTAS96;Widmer, E., Verpoorte, E., Eds.;
Special Issue of Analytical Methods and Instrumentation
AMI;S. Banard: Basel, 1996;pp 3–8.
8
9
. Van den Berg, A.;Bergveld, P. Development of lTAS
Concepts at the MESA Research Institute. In Proceedings
of the 2nd International Symposium on Miniaturized Total
Analysis Systems, lTAS96;Widmer, E., Verpoorte, E.,
Eds.;Special Issue of Analytical Methods and Instrumen-
tation AMI;S. Banard: Basel, 1996;pp 9–15.
. Ramsey, J. M. Miniature Chemical Measurement Sys-
tems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium
on Miniaturized Total Analysis Systems, lTAS96;Widmer,
E., Verpoorte, E., Eds.;Special Issue of Analytical
Methods and Instrumentation AMI;S. Banard: Basel,
1
1. Mechanism of the reaction
The oxidative addition of bromoarenes to the surface of
the Pd nanoparticle is believed to be the first step in the
coupling reactions.
enhanced by the incorporation of electron withdrawing
0
2
4
Rate of the reaction can be
2
5
groups on haloarenes or electron rich ligands on palla-
2
6
dium. In our reactor, we believe that the applied
potential increase the electron density on the surface
of the palladium nanoparticles and thereby enhance
the rate of reaction and the yield of the product. Further
experiments are underway to prove this hypothesis.
1
996;pp 24–29.
1
0. Northrup, M. A.;Benett, B.;Hadley, D.;Stratton, P.;
Landre, P. Advantages Afforded by Miniaturization and
Integration of DNA Analysis Instrumentation. In Pro-
ceedings of the 1st International Conference on Microreac-
tion Technology, IMRET1;Ehrfeld, W., Ed.;Springer:
Berlin, 1997;pp 278–288.
12. Conclusion
1
1. Van de Schoot, B. H.;Verpoorte, E. M. J.;Jeanneret, S.;
Manz, A.;De Rooij, N. R. Microsystems for Analysis in
Flowing Solutions. In Proceedings of the Micro Total
We have demonstrated the design and feasibility of per-
forming Suzuki coupling reactions using a glass capil-
lary-microreactor with high yields (82–95% in
comparison with 11–23% for the conventional method).
Either individual or a mixture of reactants can be used
in the reactor without compromising the identity or
yield of the reaction product(s). The reaction protocol
is rapid and could be useful for the qualitative and quan-
titative determination of novel catalytic reactions.
Unlike photolithographic microreactors, our ordinary
glass capillary reactors are easily available, affordable,
easier to use and the progress of the reaction can be
monitored through a variety of techniques, including
direct visualization. This approach is useful for design-
ing novel catalysts, reactions and generating new data-
bases for chemical libraries.
0
Analysis Systems, lTAS 94;Twente, Netherlands, 1994;
pp 181–190.
12. Jakeway, S. C.;De Mello, A. J.;Russel, E. Fresenius J.
Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 525–539.
13. Hendershot, D. C. Chem. Eng. Prog. 2000, 96, 35–40.
14. Fletcher, P. D. I.;Haswell, S. J.;Pombo-Villar, E.;
Warrington, B. H.;Watts, P.;Wong, S. Y. F.;Zhang,
X. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4735–4757.
15. Licklider, L.;Kuhr, W. G.;Lacey, M. P.;Keough, T.;
Purdon, M. P.;Takigiku, R. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67,
4
170–4177.
6. Maharrey, S. P.;Miller, D. R. AIChE J. 2001, 47,
203–1211.
1
1
17. Miyaura, N.;Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457–2483.
18. Suzuki, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147–168.
19. Bradley, J. S.;Millar, J. M.;Hill, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
991, 113, 4016–4017.
Acknowledgements
20. Li, Y.;Hong, X. M.;Collard, D. M.;El-Sayed, M. A. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 2385–2388.
21. Li, Y.;Boone, E.;El-Sayed, M. A. Langmuir 2002, 18,
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial sup-
port the Agency for Science, Technology and Research
of Singapore and the National University of Singapore.
4
921–4925.
2. Kotha, S.;Lahiri, K.;Kashinath, D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
633–9695.
3. Schmalzing, D.;Adourian, A.;Koutny, L.;Ziaugra, L.;
2
2
9
Matsudaira, P.;Ehrlich, D.
2303–2310.
Anal. Chem. 1998, 70,
References and notes
2
4. Suzuki, A. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions;
Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.;Wiley–VCH: EWeinheim,
1998;pp 49–97.
1
2
. Mitchell, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 717–721.
. Kopp, M. U.;Crabtree, H. J.;Manz, A.
Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 410–419.
Curr. Opin.
25. LeBlond, C. R.;Andrews, A. T.;Sun, Y.;Sowa, J. R., Jr.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1555–1557.
26. (a) Littke, A. F.;Dai, C.;Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 4020;(b) Wolfe, J. P.;Singer, R. A.;Yang, B.
H.;Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9550.
3
. Colyer, C. R.;Tang, T.;Chiem, N.;Harrison, D. J.
Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 1733–1741.
. Schult, K.;Katerkamp, A.;Trau, D.;Grawe, F.;Cam-
man, K.;Meusel, M. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 5430–5435.
4