preparation of iminosugars with D-configuration, whereas few
routes are available for the synthesis of their corresponding
L-analogues.8 This fact is evidently due to the larger
commercial availability of D-series sugars as starting materi-
als, as well as to the fact that glycosides belonging to D-series
are the natural substrates of almost all glycosidases. However,
it is worth recalling that iminosugars mimicking the sugar
moiety structure of the natural substrate are not always
inhibitors of the corresponding glycosidase. D-manno-DNJ
(DMJ) is known as a much better inhibitor of R-L-fucosidase
than R-D-mannosidase; on the other hand L-allo-DNJ is a
better inhibitor of R-D-mannosidase than D-DMJ.9 As recently
shown,10 an explanation of this behavior could be found
considering that D-enantiomers are competitive inhibitors of
D-glycosidases, whereas their L-enantiomers are noncompeti-
tive inhibitors of the same enzymes.
devoted to the preparation of several polyhydroxylated
compounds.12
The synthesis began with the coupling of the in situ
prepared C-3 lithiated carbanion of 3 with the Garner13
aldehyde 4 (Table 1) to afford a syn/anti diastereomeric
Table 1. Three-Carbon Homologation
solvent
catalyst (20%)
(anti/syn) dr
yield(%)
THF
THF
THF
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
none
60:40
60:40
60:40
70:30
82:18
91:9
83
80
85
49
73
72
Ti(O-i-Pr)4
Cp2TiCl2
Cp2TiCl2
ZnBr2
In the context of our ongoing program directed toward
the achievement of a new synthetic methodology for the
preparation of polyhydroxylated molecules, we have devel-
oped a versatile strategy for the synthesis of non-naturally
occurring deoxy-iminopyranoses belonging to L-series, through
a non-carbohydrate based route.
none
mixture of alcohols 5. As highlighted in Table 1, the best
stereoselectivity was achieved by the use of Et2O without
catalyst, providing anti-5 in good stereoselectivity (91:9 dr).
Interestingly, the stereochemical outcome of the reaction
seemed to be mainly influenced by the nature of the solvent,14
whereas any significant stereoselective induction was not
observed in the presence of the catalysts.15
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Path
The secondary alcohol16 anti-5, obtained by the coupling
reaction, was separated from its diastereomer by flash
chromatography; the stereochemical assignment at the newly
generated C-4 was clearly deduced by X-ray analysis (Figure
2).
As outlined in Scheme 1, the synthesis involves the use
of an heterocyclic synthon, the 5,6-dihydro-1,4-dithiin-2-yl-
[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]methane11 (3), a reagent capable of
three-carbon homologation of electrophiles by the introduc-
tion of a fully protected allylic alcohol moiety, already
(7) For comprehensive reviews see: (a) Afarinkia, K.; Bahar, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1239-1287. (b) Pearson, M. S. M.;
Allaimat, M. M.; Fargeas, V.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2159-
2191. Carbohydrate-based routes to DNJ and congeners: (c) Asano, N.;
Oseki, K.; Kizu, H.; Matsui, K. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 3701-3706. (d)
O’Brien, J. L.; Tosin, M.; Murphy, P. V. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3353-3356.
(e) Spreidz, J. S.; Stu¨tz, A. E.; Wrodnigg, T. M. Carbohydr. Res. 2002,
337, 183-191 and references cited therein. Non-carbohydrate based routes
to DNJ and congeners: (f) Haukaas, M. H.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 401-404. (g) Ruiz, M.; Ojea, V.; Ruanova, T. M.; Quintela, J. M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 795-799. (h) Takahata, H.; Banba,
Y.; Sasatani, M.; Nemoto, H.; Kato, A.; Adachi, I. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
8199-8205 and literature cited therein.
Figure 2. X-ray analysis of anti-5.
With the educt 5 in hand, our interest was focused on the
achievement of key intermediate 9 (Scheme 2). To this
purpose, we converted the alcohol 5 in its diacetate 6 by
deprotection of the oxazolidine ring and acetylation of the
(8) Meyers, A. I.; Andres, C. J.; Resek, J. E.; Woddall, C. C.;
McLaughlin, M. A.; Lee, P. H.; Price, D. A. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8931-
8952.
(11) Guaragna, A.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. In e-Encyclopedia of
Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L. A., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons:
New York, 2007. In press.
(9) Kato, A.; Kato, N.; Kano, E.; Adachi, I.; Ikeda, K.; Yu, L.; Okamoto,
T.; Banba, Y.; Ouchi, H.; Takahata, H.; Asano, N. J. Med. Chem. 2005,
48, 2036-2044.
(10) Asano, N.; Ikeda, K.; Yu, L.; Kato, A.; Takebayashi, K.; Adachi,
I.; Kato, I.; Ouchi, H.; Takahata, H.; Fleet, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2005, 16, 223-229.
(12) (a) Caputo, R.; Guaragna, A.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 9369-9371. (b) Caputo, R.; De Nisco, M.; Festa, P.;
Guaragna, A.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7033-
7037. (c) Guaragna, A.; Napolitano, C.; D’Alonzo, D.; Pedatella, S.;
Palumbo, G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4863-4866.
(13) Garner, P.; Park, J. M. Org. Synth., Collected Vol. IX 1998, 300.
3474
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 17, 2007