by a process that results in a bleach growing in around 690 nm,
corresponding to the ZnPc Q-band (Fig. 2c). This process is
ascribed to hole transfer from the 1SnP state, resulting in the same
charge separated state as in the previously described electron
transfer. The partial bleach recovery of the SnP Soret band is
consistent with a smaller net bleach of the SnP2-radical compared
to 1SnP (Fig. S2, S5{). Recombination to the ground state occurs
with the same time constant (85 ps) regardless of which
chromophore is initially excited, further strengthening the
conclusion that it is the same charge separated state.
Research for the ‘‘Action Concerte´e Incitative’’ (ACI) ‘‘Jeune
Chercheur’’ 4057 and the ANR program ‘‘PhotoCumElec’’.
Notes and references
1 M. R. Wasielewski, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 435–461.
2 V. Balzani, P. Piotrowiak, M. A. J. Rodgers, J. Mattay, D. Astruc,
H. B. Gray, J. Winkler, S. Fukuzumi, T. E. Mallouk, Y. Haas, A. P.
de Silva and I. Gould, in Electron Transfer in Chemistry, ed. V. Balzani,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 3.
3 K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, in The Porphyrin
Handbook, Elsevier, New York, 1999, vol. 16–19.
4 L. Li, S. Shen, Q. Yu, Q. Zhou and H. Xu, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1991, 619–620; E. M. Maya, P. Vazquez and T. Torres,
Chem. Commun., 1997, 1175–1176; M. A. Miller, R. K. Lammi,
S. Prathapan, D. Holten and J. S. Lindsey, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65,
6634–6649; J. M. Sutton and R. W. Boyle, Chem. Commun., 2001,
2014–2015; J. P. C. Tome´, A. M. V. M. Pereira, C. M. A. Alonso,
M. G. P. M. S. Neves, A. C. Tome´, A. M. S. Silva, J. A. S. Cavaleiro,
M. V. Mart´ınez-D´ıaz, T. Torres, G. M. A. Rahman, J. Ramey and
D. M. Guldi, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2006, 257–267.
Energy transfer from the 1SnP to 1ZnPc is energetically possible,
but can be excluded since the subsequent charge separation from
1
1ZnPc is slower (tET = 13 ps) than the observed decay of SnP.
Thus a distinct intermediate state, with a 13 ps transient absorption
component, would have been seen. There is also a fraction of the
sample that is not quenched. The behaviour of this fraction is very
similar to that observed in references 3 and 12, starting with a
singlet signal that over time evolves into a triplet that subsequently
decays back to the ground state, on similar timescales (Fig. S4{).
With 440 nm excitation, sample degradation during measurements
made this component large, as seen by the significant porphyrin
bleach remaining at 1000 ps (Fig. 2c).
Electron transfer from 1ZnPc has to proceed through the direct
super-exchange mechanism,18 as the bridge is too difficult to
reduce for electron hopping to occur. Although similarly rapid
single step charge transfer has been reported for dyads containing
porphyrins or phthalocyanines with a direct ethynyl linkage,8,9
there is to our knowledge no system with similar rates over a
comparably long distance (34 s, centre-to-centre). Studies of long-
range electron transfer in similar systems, where the bridge binds
to the porphyrins via a meso-phenyl unit, report rates that are two
orders of magnitude slower than those reported here.19
5 C. Monnereau, J. Gomez, E. Blart, F. Odobel, S. Wallin, A. Fallberg
and L. Hammarstro¨m, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 4806–4817.
6 F. Odobel, S. Suresh, E. Blart, Y. Nicolas, J.-P. Quintard, P. Janvier,
J.-Y. Le Questel, B. Illien, D. Rondeau, P. Richomme, T. Haupl,
S. Wallin and L. Hammarstro¨m, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3027–3046.
7 S. M. LeCours, H.-W. Guan, S. G. DiMagno, C. H. Wang and
M. J. Therien, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1497–1503; E. M. Garcia-
Frutos, S. M. O’Flaherty, E. M. Maya, G. De La Torre, W. Blau,
P. Vazquez and T. Torres, J. Mater. Chem., 2003, 13, 749–753.
8 N. P. Redmore, I. V. Rubtsov and M. J. Therien, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 8769–8778.
9 D. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, C. G. Claessens, T. Torres, S. Liu,
L. Echegoyen, N. Vila and S. Nonell, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11,
´
3881–3893; A. J. Jime´nez, F. Spa¨nig, M. S. Rodr´ıguez-Morgade,
K. Ohkubo, S. Fukuzumi, D. M. Guldi and T. Torres, Org. Lett., 2007,
9, 2481–2484.
10 R. W. Wagner, T. E. Johnson, F. Li and J. S. Lindsey, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 5266–5273.
11 D. P. Arnold and J. Blok, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 299–319.
12 M. J. Crossley, P. Thordarson and R. A. S. Wu, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 2001, 2294–2302.
13 F. Odobel, F. Suzenet, E. Blart and J.-P. Quintard, Org. Lett., 2000, 1,
131–133.
14 R. Kumble, S. Palese, V. S. Y. Lin, M. J. Therien and R. M.
Hochstrasser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11489–11498; R. Shediac,
M. H. B. Gray, H. T. Uyeda, R. C. Johnson, J. T. Hupp, P. J. Angiolillo
and M. J. Therien, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 7017–7033.
15 Phthalocyanines: Properties and Applications, ed. C. C. Leznoff and
A. B. P. Lever, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1989.
Starting from 1SnP, a hole-hopping mechanism via a transiently
oxidized bridge is energetically feasible (Fig. 3). Thus, it is
conceivable that the very rapid charge separation (tHT = 4 ps) is
due to a hopping mechanism, while the subsequent charge
recombination can only occur via a long-range super-exchange
mechanism and is therefore 20-fold slower. This is an interesting
design principle for achieving rapid, long-range charge separation
via transient states without losing energy in the intermediate steps,
as is done in a conventional multi-step, exergonic charge
separation approach demonstrated in triads and tetrads etc.1,20
The close similarity in transient spectra and lifetime of the
reference 12 to a simple SnP unit shows that the B+–SnP2 state lies
16 K. M. Kadish, Q. Y. Y. Xu, G. B. Maiya, J. M. Barbe and R. Guilard,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1989, 1531–1536.
17 Using the conventional assumption of DGu = 2e(EuDon 2 EuAcc) 2 E00.
21
For reactions in PhCN the correction term (e2/4pe0r)[(ePhCN
)
2 (eCH Cl )
21] was added. 3ZnPc energy from Gonzalez-Rodriguez
et al., ref. 9. Comparing SnP to other porphyrins with similar singlet
2
2
1
higher in energy than the SnP state, as suggested in Fig. 3. The
3
energies, SnP should lie between 1.4–1.5 eV (K. Kalyanasundram, in
predicted activation energy for hopping and super-exchange are
both very small so that temperature-dependent measurements
would not be able to safely distinguish these mechanisms.21 Instead
further studies with new compounds, modifying the relative energy
of the bridge state, are required to explore this interesting
possibility.
Photochemistry of Polypyridine and Porphyrin Complexes, Academic
Press, London, 1992).
18 W. B. Davis, W. A. Svec, M. A. Ratner and M. R. Wasielewski, Nature,
1998, 396, 60–63; H. McConnel, J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 35, 508–515.
19 K. Pettersson, J. Wiberg, T. Ljungdahl, J. Ma˚rtensson and B. Albinsson,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 319–326.
20 D. Gust, T. A. Moore and A. L. Moore, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34,
40–48; H. Imahori, Y. Mori and Y. Matano, J. Photochem. Photobiol.,
C, 2003, 4, 51–83.
21 Energy variation by changing solvent polarity was precluded because of
solubility and aggregation.
This work was supported by The Swedish Foundation for
Strategic Research, The K & A Wallenberg Foundation, The
Swedish Energy Agency, COST D35, and the French Ministry of
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 4629–4631 | 4631