arginine-glycine-aspartic acid). The RGD loop containing
peptides are the molecular attachment points of many cellular
and extracellular matrices. Along with the integrins, their
receptors, they constitute a major system for cell adhesion,10
which is crucial in many pathological processes, such as
tumor metastasis, angiogenesis, osteoporosis, and thrombosis.
Nearly half of the known integrins recognize the RGD
sequence as ligands, giving this motif a central role in cell
adhesion biology as the prototype adhesion signal.
The integrins became attractive targets for drug develop-
ment, especially those involved in cancer treatment and in
platelet aggregation. For instance, the inhibitors of the
integrin RIIbâ3, involved in platelet aggregation, are used as
antithrombotic agents,11 and the cyclic peptide, c(RGDf-
[NMe]V), an antagonist of integrin RVâ3, is in clinical tests
as an anticancer drug.12 Many cyclic RGD peptides and
nonpeptidic mimetics have been developed as highly active
and selective antagonists for different integrin receptors by
tuning the conformational bias of the macrocycle.11-17
On the basis of the pharmacophore model proposed by
Kessler and co-workers (1),18 the structure-activity relation-
ship (SAR) and docking studies on Rvâ3 integrin ligands,19,20
as well as synthetic feasibility, we designed cyclic pentapep-
toid analogues of RGD peptides (Figure 1). Thus, the main
of the amides and not to the R carbon as in peptides. The
shift of the side chains to the amide nitrogen commonly
results in increased metabolic stability. It can be done in two
different directions: (1) toward the “N-terminus” direction,
that is, to the nitrogen atom of the amino acid itself (CR f
Ni), or (2) to the “C-terminus” direction, that is, to the
nitrogen atom of the next amino acid residue (CR f Ni+1).
As shown in Figure 1, for any given R and R′, a peptoid
(“RGD”) and a retro-peptoid (“DGR”) can be formed within
a cyclic peptide; that is, four different cyclopeptoid configu-
rations with the side chain sequence of R-G-D are possible.
For the targeted cyclopeptoids 2 and 3, the CR f Ni shift
had to be followed. Also, compared to classical peptoids,
these compounds contain some amide-NH bonds that allow
H-donor interaction, albeit less than in peptides.
The retrosynthetic analysis of the peptoids (Scheme 1)
shows that the proposed compounds can be achieved
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis
employing two consecutive Ugi four-component reactions
(U-4CRs) for the construction of the acyclic amino acid
precursor, and another Ugi three-component four-center
reaction for the peptoid macrocyclization. A general route
was developed in which the side chains of the peptoid
backbone could be easily exchanged by varying the amine,
leading to both kinds of target peptoids, the RGD- and the
DGR-like compounds.
Figure 1. Structures of RGD peptide pharmacophore model (1)
and of the cyclic pentapeptoid analogues. 2: CR f Ni shifted
peptoid; 3: retro CR f Ni shifted peptoid. Ni+1 shifted peptoids
are not shown.
A special challenge was the introduction of the guani-
dinium group. Attempts to use ethyl or propylamine with
(14) Goodman, S. L.; Ho¨lzemann, G.; Sulyok, G. A. G.; Kessler, H. J.
Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1045.
(15) Aumailley, M.; Gurrath, M.; Mu¨ller, G.; Calvete, J.; Timpl, R.;
Kessler, H. FEBS Lett. 1991, 291, 50.
(16) Hayashi, Y.; Sato, Y.; Katada, J.; Takiguchi, Y.; Ojima, I.; Uno, I.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1351.
innovation in this approach is the rapid access to the cyclic
skeleton, in principle, suitable to combinatorial extension,
and the fact that the side chains are attached to the nitrogen
(17) Dijkgraaf, I.; Kruijtzer, J. A. W.; Frielink, C.; Soede, A. C.; Hilbers,
H. W.; Oyen, W. J. G.; Corstens, F. H. M.; Liskamp, R. M. J.; Boerman,
O. C. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006, 33, 953.
(18) Haubner, R.; Gratias, R.; Diefenbach, B.; Goodman, S. L.; Jonczyk,
A.; Kessler, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7461.
(19) Gottschalk, K.-E.; Kessler, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
3767.
(10) Rouslahti, E.; Pierschbacher, M. D. Science 1987, 238, 491.
(11) Haubner, R.; Schimitt, W.; Ho¨lzemann, G.; Goodman, S. L.;
Jonczyk, A.; Kessler, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7881.
(12) Dechantsreiter, M. A.; Planker, E.; Matha¨, B.; Lohof, E.; Ho¨lzemann,
G.; Jonczyk, A.; Goodman, S. L.; Kessler, H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42,
3033.
(13) Wermuth, J.; Goodman, S. L.; Jonczyk, A.; Kessler, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 1328.
(20) Marinelli, L.; Lavecchia, A.; Gottschalk, K.-E.; Novellino, E.;
Kessler, H. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4393.
206
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008