to polymerizations. In 2002, Krische and Roush indepen-
dentlyreportedanintramolecularversionoftheRauhut-Currier
employing bis-enone substrates.5 Miller has recently reported
an elegant enantioselective intramolecular Rauhut-Currier
variant with similar bis-enones using one equivalent of
N-acetyl cysteine as the promoter.5k Despite the progress of
the intramolecular manifold, a successful intermolecular
Rauhut-Currier reaction has not emerged to date. A useful
bimolecular process could indeed expand the utility of this
bond-forming process. In this Communication, we disclose
that the Lewis acid-catalyzed conjugate additions of
silyloxyallenes afford a wide variety of 1,5-dicarbonyl
compounds that map directly onto what would be products
of an intermolecular Rauhut-Currier process (Scheme 1,
Option 2).
would generate products from the apparent coupling of two
different R,ꢀ-unsaturated carbonyl compounds via an inter-
molecular Rauhut-Currier reaction.
Given the mild nucleophilicity of silyloxyallenes, alky-
lidene malonates were examined as conjugate acceptors with
racemic 1.10 After surveying potential Lewis acids at 10 mol
%, we discovered that scandium triflate promotes the addition
of 1 in only 9% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Although only
Table 1. Optimization of Michael Additiona
Silyloxyallenes have emerged as versatile and useful
R-acylvinyl anion equivalents.6,7 These latent enolates are
prepared readily from the corresponding acylsilanes by way
of the Kuwajima-Reich rearrangent of R-hydroxypropar-
gylsilanes.8 Recently, we have demonstrated that silyloxy-
allenes undergo additions to aldehydes in the presence of
Lewis acids and high yields are achieved for a wide scope
of substrates with excellent control over the resulting double
bond geometry. Encouaged by the full potential of these un-
usual nucleophiles, we have developed an enantioselective
variant of this reaction using racemic silyloxyallenes and a
chiral (salen)Cr(III) Lewis acid catalyst.9 In an effort to
broaden the use of silyloxyallenes as nontraditional nucleo-
philic reagents, we have explored conjugate additions of these
R-acylvinyl anion equivalents. This reaction, if successful,
entry
additive
none
solvent temp (°C) time (h) yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CH2Cl2
23
23
18
18
24
48
24
18
18
18
18
9
54
0
(CF3)2CHOH CH2Cl2
(CF3)2CHOH THF
(CF3)2CHOH Et2O
(CF3)2CHOH PhCH3
(CF3)2CHOH MeCN
(CF3)2CHOH MeCN
(CF3)2CHOH MeCN
(CF3)2CHOH MeCN
23
23
23
23
0
-20
-40
71
55
61
77
95
71
a 1 (1.5 equiv), 1 equiv of alkylidene malonate. b Isolated yield.
weakly encouraging, we postulated that catalyst turnover was
rate limiting with these conditions. After surveying an
assortment of additives, the addition of hexafluoroisopropanol
(HFIP) improves the yield to 54% (entry 2). Changing the
solvent to acetonitrile provides the optimal balance of rate
and yield (entry 6).11 Finally, lowering the temperature to
-20 °C in acetonitrile with 10 mol % Sc(OTf)3 and HFIP
(1 equiv) delivers the Rauhut-Currier product in 95% yield
and >20:1 regioselectivity favoring the Z-isomer (entry 8).
With these optimized bond-forming conditions in hand,
the electrophilic scope of the transformation was explored
(Table 2). Various alkylidene malonates were found to be
reactive partners. A wide range of aromatic ꢀ-substituents
is tolerated in good to excellent yields (entries 1-4).
Aliphatic substituents are also accommodated with excellent
selectivities and yields including two examples of R-branched
substituents (entries 7 and 8). However, the more hindered
tert-butyl substituted alkylidene malonate is unreactive under
the reaction conditions (entry 9).
(4) (a) Hwu, J. R.; Hakimelahi, G. H.; Chou, C. T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 6469–6472. (b) Evans, C. A.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 12394–12395. (c) Evans, C. A.; Cowen, B. J.; Miller, S. J.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6309–6314. (d) Dadwal, M.; Mohan, R.; Panda, D.;
Mobin, S. M.; Namboothiri, I. N. N. Chem. Commun. 2006, 338–340. (e)
Yin, Y. B.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Sun, S. G.; Liu, Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006,
47, 6071–6074.
(5) (a) Wang, L. C.; Luis, A. L.; Agapiou, K.; Jang, H. Y.; Krische,
M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2402–2403. (b) Frank, S. A.; Mergott,
D. J.; Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2404–2405. (c) Brown,
P. M.; Kappel, N.; Murphy, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8707–8710.
(d) Mergott, D. J.; Frank, S. A.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3157–
3160. (e) Agapiou, K.; Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1737–1740. (f)
Methot, J. L.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4223–4226. (g) Couturier,
M.; Menard, F.; Ragan, J. A.; Riou, M.; Dauphin, E.; Andresen, B. M.;
Ghosh, A.; Dupont-Gaudet, K.; Girardin, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1857–
1860. (h) Luis, A. L.; Krische, M. J. Synthesis 2004, 2579–2585. (i) Mergott,
D. J.; Frank, S. A.; Roush, W. R. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101, 11955–
11959. (j) Brown, P. M.; Kappel, N.; Murphy, P. J.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse,
M. B. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1100–1106. (k) Aroyan, C. E.; Miller, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 256–257.
(6) (a) Reynolds, T. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 15382–15383. (b) Reynolds, T. E.; Stern, C. A.; Scheidt,
K. A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2581–2584
.
(7) For previous examples of silyloxyallenes as nucleophiles, see: (a)
Merault, G.; Bourgeoi, P.; Dunogues, J.; Duffaut, N, J. Organomet. Chem.
1974, 76, 17–27. (b) Fleming, I.; Perry, D. A. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 4027–
4034. (c) Kato, M.; Kuwajima, I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 57, 827–
830. (d) Reich, H. J.; Eisenhart, E. K.; Olson, R. E.; Kelly, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7791–7800. (e) Stergiades, I. A.; Tius, M. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7547–7551. (f) Li, G. G.; Wei, H. X.; Phelps, B. S.;
Purkiss, D. W.; Kim, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 823–826. (g) Yoshizawa,
K.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 6259. (h) Mueller, A. J.; Jennings,
The effect of the silyloxyallene on the reaction was also
investigated (Table 3). A broad range of substituents was
(10) For selected additions to alkylidene malonates, see: (a) Evans, D. A.;
Rovis, T.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Downey, C. W.; Tedrow, J. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 9134–9142. (b) Lassaletta, J. M.; Vazquez, J.; Prieto, A.;
Fernandez, R.; Raabe, G.; Enders, D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2698–2703.
(c) Betancort, J. M.; Sakthivel, K.; Thayumanavan, R.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas,
C. F. Synthesis 2004, 1509–1521. (d) Prieto, A.; Fernandez, R.; Lassaletta,
J. M.; Vazquez, J.; Alvarez, E. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4609–4613. (e) Cao,
C. L.; Sun, X. L.; Zhou, J. L.; Tang, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4073–
4076.
M. P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5327–5329
.
(8) (a) Kuwajima, I.; Kato, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 623–626.
(b) Reich, H. J.; Olson, R. E.; Clark, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
1423–1424.
(9) Reynolds, T. E.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
7806–7809.
(11) Although diethyl ether gave the highest yield, the reaction was
slower than with acetonitrile.
2450
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008