plication of CBr4 in organic synthesis, which involve the
initial formation of triphenylphosphine bromide (TPPB) or
analogue via a SN2 type attacking of the phosphorus atom
of PPh3 at a bromine atom of CBr4. In this work, the initial
studies were focused on the investigation of the C-S cross-
coupling of a dithiocarbamate, which was derived from the
reaction of an amine and carbon disulfide,9 with an active
methylene compound in the presence of CBr4. The design
was based on the consideration that the C-S coupling might
occur through a transient (dialkylamino(thiocarbonyl))-
sulfenyl bromide intermediate10 which, similar to Appel
agents,7,8 could be formed in situ by the nucleophilic attack
of a dithiocarbamate anion on a bromine atom of CBr4, and
then trapped by an active methylene compound to form an
organic dithiocarbamate.
A model reaction between dimethylamine 1a, carbon
disulfide, acetylacetone 2a and CBr4 was first examined
under various conditions. Among the solvents tested, CH2Cl2
proved to be the most efficient (Table 1, entry 6). After
optimization, in open air at ambient temperature, the mixture
comprising 1a (1.0 equiv), CS2 (1.0 equiv), 2a (1.2 equiv),
CBr4 (1.0 equiv), and triethylamine (1.2 equiv, as the base)
for 2.0 h gave the C-S bond formation product, 2,4-
dioxopentan-3-yl dimethylcarbamodithioate 3aa in 96% yield
(Table 1, entry 9). The structure of 3aa was characterized
on the basis of its spectra and analytical data, as well as
X-ray diffraction (Figure S1, Supporting Information).11
Comparatively, in the absence of CBr4, 3aa could not be
obtained at all (Table 1, entry 1) and catalytic amount of
CBr4 was not enough to drive the reaction to completion
(Table 1, entry 10). The reactivity of CCl4 was also examined
concerning this C-S bond-forming reaction, but proved to
be inactive under otherwise the same conditions (Table 1,
entry 11).
Table 1. Reaction of Dimethylamine 1a with Acetylacetone 2a
under Different Conditions
entry 1a/CS2/2a/CX4 CX4
base
solvent yield (%)a
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1.0/1.0/7.5/0
CBr4
s
s
s
s
s
s
neat
-
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4 Et3N (1.0) CH2Cl2
1.0/1.0/1.0/1.0 CBr4 Et3N (1.2) CH2Cl2
1.0/1.0/1.2/1.0 CBr4 Et3N (1.2) CH2Cl2
1.0/1.0/1.2/0.5 CBr4 Et3N (1.2) CH2Cl2
1.0/1.0/1.2/1.0 CCl4 Et3N (1.2) CH2Cl2
CH3CN
C2H5OH
THF
DMF
CH2Cl2
18
25
31
36c
50
56
72
96
49
10
11
b
-
a Isolated yields. b No reaction. c Thiuram disulfide was found to be the
main product.
and the corresponding dithiocarbamates 3aa-ea were ob-
tained in high to excellent yields (Table 2, entries 1-5).12
Then the reactions of amines and CS2 with other active
methylenes were examined in the following work. Under
identical conditions as described above, the reactions of
diethylamine 1b, CS2 with ethyl acetoacetate 2b, 3-oxo-N-
phenylbutanamide 2c, N-(4-cholorophenyl)-3-oxobutanamide
2d, 4-chlorobenzoylacetone 2e, and diethyl malonate 2f were
carried out. All reactions proceeded smoothly to afford the
desired products 3bb-bf in high yields (Table 2, entries
6-10).13 Other active methylenes such as malonitrile and
ethyl nitroacetate were examined, but proved to be inefficient
to afford the corresponding C-S bond formation products.
Additionally, the reaction of sodium ethoxide with CS2 and
acetylacetone, and the reaction of dithiobenzoic acid with
acetylacetone were performed. In the presence of CBr4, both
reactions proceeded efficiently, giving xanthate14 4 and
dithioester 5 in 77 and 81% yield, respectively (Scheme 1).
Obviously, this protocol provides a simple and efficient route
to dithiocarbamates 3, xanthates 4, and dithioesters 5. These
compounds are valuable synthetic intermediates15 and have
Next, under the optimized conditions as above (Table 1,
entry 9), a range of reactions of various amines with
acetylacetone and CS2 in the presence of CBr4 were
investigated. The reactions with secondary aliphatic amines,
such as dimethylamine 1a, diethylamine 1b, dibutylamine
1c, morpholine 1d, and piperidine 1e proceeded efficiently
(6) (a) Hunter, W. H.; Edgar, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 2025–
2028. (b) Abele, E.; Rubina, K.; Abele, R.; Gaukhman, A.; Lukevics, E.
J. Chem. Res. 1998, 618–619. (c) Abele, E.; Fleisher, M.; Rubina, K.; Abele,
R.; Lukevics, E. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2001, 165, 121–126. (d) Camps,
X.; Scho¨nberger, H.; Hirsch, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 1997, 3, 561–567.
(7) (a) Appel, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 801–811. (b)
Rabinowitz, R.; Marcus, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 1312–1313.
(8) (a) Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 36, 3769–
3772. (b) Mori, M.; Tonogaki, K.; Kinoshita, A. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 1–
13. (c) Marshall, J. A.; Yanik, M. M.; Adams, N. D.; Ellis, K. C.; Chobanian,
H. R. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 157–170. (d) Fokin, A. A.; Schreiner, P. R.
AdV. Synth. Cat. 2003, 345, 1035–1052. (e) Donovan, P. M.; Scott, L. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3108–3112.
(12) In our experiment, it was found that the secondary aromatic amines
were inert to this C-S bond formation reaction, probably due to their weaker
nucleophilicity. For primary aliphatic amines, the resulting products were
not the desired C-S bond formation products. Instead, thioureas were
obtained based on the spectra data.
(13) In some cases, the S-S coupling products could be detected. In
the absence of the carbon nucleophiles, the thiuram disulfides would be
produced via S-S coupling. The CBr4-promoted S-S coupling reaction
will be reported seperately, along with the results mentioned in ref 12.
(14) For a review on xanthates, see: Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1997, 36, 672–685.
(9) Li, G.; Tajima, H.; Ohtani, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4539–4540.
(10) Selected examples for sulfenyl halides, see: (a) Koval′, I. V. Russ.
Chem. ReV. 1995, 64, 731–751. (b) Schroll, A. L.; Eastep, S. J.; Barany,
G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1475. (c) Kharasch, N.; Gleason, G. I.; Buess,
C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 1796–1798. (d) Kharasch, N.; Langford,
R. B. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1903–1905. (e) Romano, R. M.; Della
Vedova, C. O.; Downs, A. J.; Greene, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
5794–5801. (f) Kuhle, E. Synthesis 1970, 561–580. (g) Kato, S.; Komatsu,
Y.; Miyagawa, K.; Ishida, M. Synthesis 1983, 552–553.
(15) (a) Boas, U.; Jakobsen, M. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
1995–1996. (b) Elgemeie, G. H.; Sayed, S. H. Synthesis 2001, 1747–1771.
(c) Mukerjee, A. K.; Ashare, R. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91, 1–14. (d) Boas, U.;
Gertz, H.; Christensen, J. B.; Heegaard, P. M. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 269–272. (e) Grainger, R. S.; Innocenti, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 3445–3448. (f) Fabre, S.; Vila, X.; Zard, S. Z. Chem. Commun. 2006,
4964–4966.
(11) X-ray diffraction data for 3aa has been deposited in the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre with supplementary publication number of
CCDC 616702.
2486
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008