Y. Uetake et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 6847–6850
6849
Table 2
ethoxycarbonylation. The Au(I)-catalyzed reaction of 10a under
the similar conditions as those in entry 14 of Table 1 afforded
11a in 48% yield (entry 1). The reaction proceeded regioselectively;
that is, without affording products derived from the regioisomeric
addition of I, such as compound 8 observed in entry 6 of Table 1.
This selectivity would be attributed to the inherent nature of yno-
ate toward the Au(I)-catalyzed reaction.8 The reaction did not
require heating, indicating that the reactivity of 10a is better than
6 in this reaction. The use of 4 Å improved the yield to 53%; hence,
the reactions in entries 3 and 4 were carried out in the presence of
MS 4 Å. The use of cHexJohnPhos (entry 4) and IPr (entry 6)
improved the yield to 63% and 55%, respectively, but (4-MeOC6-
H4)3P (entry 3) and XPhos (entry 5) gave almost the same results
as Ph3P (entry 1).
Au(I)-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of 1,5-ene-yne 10a
TBDPSO
H
TBDPSO
catalyst (10 mol %), MS 4 Å
CH2Cl2, rt
O
I
(3.0 equiv)
H
CO2Et
N
O
CO2Et
10a
11a
Entry
Catalyst
Time (h)
Yield (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
Ph3PAuCl + AgSbF6
Ph3PAuCl + AgSbF6
(4-MeOC6H4)3PAuCl + AgSbF6
cHexJohnPhosAuCl + AgSbF6
XPhosAuCl + AgSbF6
12
12
24
12
48
12
48b
53
51
63
50
55
IPrAuCl + AgSbF6
The Au(I)-catalyzed reaction of 1,5-ene-ynes 10b–g (Table 3)
possessing different hydroxyl and carboxyl protecting groups was
examined. The ester moiety (R5) of 10a was changed from ethyl
to isobutyl (entry 2), isopropyl (entry 3), and tert-butyl (entry 4),
and the reaction of tert-butyl ester 10d afforded 11d in 69% yield.
a
Isolated yields.
MS 4 Å was not used.
b
was formed in 62% yield though the reason is not clear at
this stage. Compound was thought to be formed via
Interestingly, 13% of c-lactone 12 was formed, suggesting that the
reaction proceeded via cationic intermediates.9 The protecting
group of the hydroxyl (R4) was changed from TBDPS to MOM
(entry 5) and Bn (entry 6) to examine the effect of the alkyl ether
oxygen on the Au(I)-catalyzed reaction; however, both protecting
groups did not affect the results. Finally, the reaction of a deoxy-
genated derivative 10g (R4 = H, entry 7) was examined and 11g
was obtained in 75% yield.
9
a
cycloisomerization pathway that proceeds without oxidant III.
However, the reaction in the absence of the oxidant resulted in
the formation of a complex mixture (entry 8). The reactions with
more nucleophilic oxidants, 4-methoxypyridine N-oxide IV7 (entry
9), or DMAP N-oxide V7 (entry 10), resulted in the formation of a
trace amount of 7 or no reaction.
Oxidant I was found to be most effective for the Au(I)-catalyzed
oxidative cyclization of 6 (entry 3). This could be attributed to the
suitably hindered structure of I. That is, the reaction with oxidant I
proceeds and the corresponding by-product 8-methylquinoline
does not inhibit the reaction because the coordination of 8-meth-
ylquinoline to Au(I) would be suppressed by the 8-methyl group.
The effect of silver salt (AgNTf2, AgOTf, AgPF6, and AgSbF6) on
the Au(I)-catalyzed reaction was surveyed (entries 11–14), and
the reaction with AgSbF6 was found to afford the best yield
(56%). The ligand of Au(I) was also examined (entries 15–18),
and the use of (4-MeOC6H4)3P (entry 15) and IPr (entry 18)
improved the yield to 62% and 59%, respectively, while cHexJohn-
Phos (entry 16) and XPhos (entry 17) were found to be less effec-
tive than Ph3P (entry 14).
To examine the applicability of the Au(I)-catalyzed cyclization,
the reaction was applied to other substrates (Scheme 5). Cycliza-
tion of 1,6-ene-yne 13, which is a one-carbon homologated deriv-
ative of 10d, was carried out under the conditions optimized in
Table 3, and the desired product 14 was formed in 38% yield. Fur-
thermore, acyclic 1,5-ene-ynes 15 and 18 were converted under
the same conditions to the desired cyclopropanes 16 and 19,
respectively. The yields of 14, 16, and 19 were not so high, how-
ever, further optimization for each substrate may improve the
yield. The reaction of 15 also afforded by-product
as previously observed for 10d (cf. Table 3, entry 4). Interestingly,
the formation of -lactone 20 was not observed in the reaction of
c-lactone 17,
c
18. This may be attributed to the stability of the cationic
intermediate.
To the best of our knowledge, the Au(I)-catalyzed reaction of
1,5-ene-ynes possessing an ester group at the terminal alkyne car-
bon has never been reported, so the reaction of 10a was examined
(Table 2). Compound 10a was prepared from 6 by lithiation and
In summary, we have developed Au(I)-catalyzed oxidative
cyclizations that successfully convert 1,5-ene-ynes and a 1,6-ene-
yne to the corresponding cycloalkanone-fused cyclopropanes in
moderate to good yields. We have shown that this Au(I)-catalyzed
Table 3
Au(I)-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of 1,5-ene-ynes 10a–g
R4
H
R4
cHexJohnPhosAuCl (10 mol %)
AgSbF6 (10 mol %)
O
O
H
MS 4Å, CH2Cl2, rt, 12 h
TBDPSO
O
O
H
CO2R5
CO2R5
I (3.0 equiv)
N
10a-g
O
11a-g
12
Entry
Substrate
R4
R5
Yield (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10a
10b
10c
10d
10e
10f
OTBDPS
Et
63 (11a)
57 (11b)
62 (11c)
69 (11d)b
72 (11e)
70 (11f)
75 (11g)
OTBDPS
OTBDPS
OTBDPS
OMOM
OBn
iBu
iPr
tBu
tBu
tBu
tBu
10g
H
a
Isolated yields.
13% of 12 was formed.
b