Table 1 Skeletal reorganization of enynes involving selective cleavage
of C–C triple bondsa
Enyne
Type II product
Yield (%)b
73 (498%) 5 h
6
5
76 (498%)c
Scheme 2 Proposed reaction mechanism of the formation of type II
products.
Ar = 1-Naphthyl (7)
Ar = 4-CF3C6H4 (9)
8
10
72 (95%) 3 hd
67 (498%) 4 h
ity, especially the role of the tether is not fully understood.
Elucidation of the reaction mechanism is the subject of current
investigations.
12
11
Notes and references
1. Reviews: (a) G. C. Lloyd-Jones, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 215;
(b) A. M. Echavarren and C. Nevado, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33,
453; (c) S. T. Diver and A. J. Giessert, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104,
Ar = 4-CF3C6H4 (13) 14
Ar = 4-MeOOCC6H4 (15) 16
76 (91%)
93 (87%)
94 (498%)
76 (498%)e
1317; (d) L. Anorbe, G. Domınguez and J. Perez-Castells,
´ ´
Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 4938; (e) L. Zhang, J. Sun and
S. A. Kozmin, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 2271.
Ar = 2-MeC6H4 (17)
18
2. (a) A. Furstner and P. W. Davies, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007,
¨
46, 3410; (b) D. J. Gorin and F. D. Toste, Nature, 2007, 446, 395;
(c) A. S. K. Hashmi, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 3180.
3. Papers on the formation of type II products: (a) N. Chatani,
T. Morimoto, T. Muto and S. Murai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994,
116, 6049; (b) N. Chatani, N. Furukawa, H. Sakurai and S. Murai,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 901; (c) S. Oi, I. Tsukamoto, S. Miyano
and Y. Inoue, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 3704; (d) C. H. Oh,
S. Y. Bang and C. Y. Rhim, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2003, 24,
20
19
a
Reaction conditions: enyne (0.5 mmol), Rh2(O2CCF3)4 (0.01 mmol),
b
toluene (2.5 mL) at 80 1C for 20 h. Type II selectivity is shown in
parentheses. Rh2(O2CCF3)4 (0.02 mmol) was used. The reaction
c
d
´
887; (e) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, S. Lopez, M. P. Munoz,
D. J. Cardenas, E. Bunuel, C. Nevado and A. M. Echavarren,
´
e
was carried out at 60 1C. The reaction was carried out at 100 1C
using Rh2(OOCCF3)4 (0.04 mmol).
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 6146; (f) Y. Miyanohana and
N. Chatani, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2155.
4. H. Nakai and N. Chatani, Chem. Lett., 2007, 36, 1494.
5. A review: M. Tobisu and N. Chatani, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37,
300.
6. Cis configuration was confirmed by X-ray analysis of 8 and the
1H NMR coupling constant. See ESIw.
though 19 has a malonate tether, showing that chain length is
also important, see Table 1 for results.
The proposed mechanism for the formation of type II is
depicted in Scheme 2. Generation of metal–carbene complex
21 via the 5-exo pathway has already been proposed based on
trapping of the metal–carbene intermediates8 as well as DFT
calculations.9 Ring opening of 21 gives a spiro intermediate 22.
The presence of a methyl group (R = Me) on the alkene
carbon facilitates formation of type II isomers because the
methyl group stabilizes the tertiary cation in 22.10 Ring-open-
ing of 22 gives the carbene complex 23, which undergoes 1,2-H
shift to give cis-configured type II isomers.11
7. A mixture of cis and trans isomers of type II was obtained in most
cases reported thus far. See ref. 3.
8. Selected examples: (a) B. M. Trost and A. S. K. Hashmi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 1085; (b) N. Chatani, K. Kataoka,
S. Murai, N. Furukawa and Y. Seki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
9104; (c) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, S. Lopez and A. M. Echavarren,
´
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 6178; (d) J. Marco-Contelles,
N. Arroyo, S. Anjum, E. Mainetti, N. Marion, K. Cariou,
G. Lemiere, V. Mouries, L. Fensterbank and M. Malacria, Eur.
´
J. Org. Chem., 2006, 4618; (e) C. A. Witham, P. Mauleon,
N. D. Shapiro, B. D. Sherry and F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 5838.
9. C. Nieto-Oberhuber, P. Pe
T. Lauterbach, C. Rodrıguez, S. Lo
D. J. Cardenas and A. M. Echavarren, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
´
rez-Gala
´
n, E. Herrero-Go
´
mez,
In summary, we have demonstrated that a Rh(II) complex
shows high catalytic activity for skeletal reorganization of 1,6-
and 1,7-enynes and for selective formation of cis-configured
type II products. Although the substrate scope is limited, this
is the first example of the selective formation of cis-configured
type II products. The reaction involves double cleavage of
both C–C double and triple bonds. The origin of this selectiv-
´
´
pez, C. Bour, A. Rosello
´
n,
´
130, 269.
10. Direct formation of 23 from 21 is proposed based on DFT
theoretical studies of the Au-catalyzed reaction. Even in this case,
the methyl group may stabilize the developing partial positive
charge in the transition state: see ref. 3e.
11. D. F. Taber and P. V. Joshi, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 4276.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 2906–2907 | 2907