Organometallics 2008, 27, 5699–5707
5699
Modular Synthesis of Functional Titanocenes
Andreas Gansa¨uer,*,† Iris Winkler,† Dennis Worgull,† Dieter Franke,† Thorsten Lauterbach,†
Andreas Okkel,† and Martin Nieger‡
Kekule´-Institut fu¨r Organische Chemie und Biochemie der UniVersita¨t Bonn, Gerhard Domagk Strasse 1,
53121 Bonn, Germany, and Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of
Helsinki, P.O. Box 55, FIN-00014 UniVersity of Helsinki, Finland
ReceiVed July 23, 2008
A modular approach to carbonyl-functionalized titanocenes is described. Through the introduction of
highly electrophilic acid chlorides to the complexes, reactions with nucleophiles can be realized that are
incompatible with classical methods of titanocene synthesis. The first amino acid functionalized titanocenes
were synthesized. The amide- and ketone-functionalized titanocenes are cationic, due to the complexation
of the carbonyl groups that results in the formation of unstrained rings.
potent donor solvents,5 the redox potential and Lewis acidity
of titanocene(III) complexes can be tailored by interactions with
appended donor ligands. In this way, the lifetime of the epoxide
-derived radicals can be increased to enable kinetically and
thermodynamically unfavorable transformations.6,7 Second, the
regioselectivity of epoxide opening, e.g. in enantioselective
reactions,8 can be controlled by fine tuning of the catalyst’s steric
demand.9 This constitutes an approach more general and flexible
than the introduction of bulky alkyl groups.10
Unfortunately, access to these functional complexes has, until
recently, been rather difficult.11 Because the [TiCl2] fragment
is rather electrophilic, titanocenes have been considered to be
incompatible with most of the nucleophilic reagents typically
used in organic synthesis. Introduction of functional groups is
thus usually carried out early in the synthetic sequence before
the metalation with titanium. In this manner a large variety of
ether-, amine-, and thiol-substituted cyclopentadienes and the
corresponding metallocenes have been prepared.11
Introduction
Organometallic complexes, and in particular metallocenes
containing additional organic groups, have recently attracted
considerable interest.1 This has been especially so when both
the metal and the organic fragment are able to bind and
recognize other molecular entities or to mediate reactivity. Such
bifunctional molecules are highly attractive as catalysts, for the
generation of supramolecular aggregates, and for the selective
binding of biological targets in medicinal chemistry.
Due to the Lewis acidity of their metals, group 4 metallocenes
are of special interest in this respect. With appropriate substitu-
tion they can interact with both (Lewis) acidic and basic sites.
Therefore, they have been employed successfully in the topical
and interdisciplinary fields of organometallic antitumor agents2
and organometallic gelators.3
Additionally, such complexes are also very interesting as
electron transfer catalysts in reductive epoxide openings4 for
two reasons. First, in the same manner as for the addition of
However, this straightforward approach employing function-
alized cyclopentadienyl anions has distinct disadvantages.12
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
(5) Larsen, J.; Enemærke, R. J.; Skrydstrup, T.; Daasbjerg, K. Orga-
nometallics 2006, 25, 2031–2036.
† Universita¨t Bonn.
‡ University of Helsinki.
(1) (a) Butenscho¨n, H. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1527–1564. (b) Bareille,
L.; Le Gendre, P.; Richard, P.; Mo¨ıse, C. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2451–
2456.
(6) (a) Gansa¨uer, A.; Lauterbach, T.; Geich-Gimbel, D. Chem. Eur. J.
2004, 10, 4983–4990. (b) Friedrich, J.; Dolg, M.; Gansa¨uer, A.; Geich-
Gimbel, D.; Lauterbach, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7071–7077.
(7) (a) Gansa¨uer, A.; Rinker, B.; Pierobon, M.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp,
M.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3815-3818; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3687-3690. (b) Gansa¨uer, A.; Rinker, B.; Ndene-
Schiffer, N.; Pierobon, M.; S.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp, M.; Mu¨ck-
Lichtenfeld, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2337–2351.
(8) (a) Gansa¨uer, A.; Lauterbach, T.; Bluhm, H.; Noltemeyer, M. Angew.
Chem. 1999, 111, 3112-3114; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2909-
2910. (b) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H.; Lauterbach, T. AdV. Synth. Cat. 2001,
343, 785–787. (c) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H.; Rinker, B.; Narayan, S.; Schick,
M.; Lauterbach, T.; Pierobon, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 531–542. (d)
Gansa¨uer, A.; Fan, C.-A.; Keller, F.; Keil, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
3484–3485. Gansa¨uer, A.; Fan, C.-A.; Keller, F.; Karbaum, P. Chem. Eur.
J. 2007, 13, 8084–8090.
(9) (a) Daasbjerg, K.; Svith, H.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp, M.; Mu¨ck-
Lichtenfeld, C.; Gansa¨uer, A.; Barchuk, A.; Keller, F. Angew. Chem. 2006,
118, 2095–2098. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2041-2044. (b) Gansa¨uer,
A.; Barchuk, A.; Keller, F.; Schmitt, M.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp, M.;
Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C.; Daasbjerg, K.; Svith, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 1359–1371.
(10) Gansa¨uer, A.; Rinker, B.; Barchuk, A.; Nieger, M. Organometallics
2004, 23, 1168–1171.
(11) Qian, Y.; Huang, J.; Bala, M. D.; Lian, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.
Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2633–2690.
(12) Erker, G.; Kehr, G.; Fro¨hlich, R. Organometallics 2008, 27, 3–14.
(2) Reviews: (a) Ko¨pf-Maier, P.; Ko¨pf, H. Chem. ReV. 1987, 87, 1137–
1152. (b) Clarke, M. J.; Zhu, F.; Frasca, D. R. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2511–
2534. (c) Harding, M. M.; Moksdi, G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 1289–
1303. (d) Abeysinghe, P. M.; Harding, M. M. Dalton Trans. 2007, 3474–
3482. (e) Strohfeldt, K.; Tacke, M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 1174–1187.
Synthetic work: (f) Alle, O. R.; Croll, L.; Gott, A. L.; Knox, R. J.;
McGowan, P. C. Organometallics 2004, 23, 288–292. (g) Tacke, M.; Allen,
L. T.; Cuffe, L.; Gallagher, W. M.; Lou, Y.; Mendoza, O.; Mu¨ller-Bunz,
H.; Rehmann, F.-J. K.; Sweeney, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 2242–
2249. (h) Causey, P. W.; Baird, M. C.; Cole, S. P. C. Organometallics
2004, 23, 4486–4494. (i) Hogan, M.; Claffey, J.; Pampillo´n, C.; Watson,
W. G.; Tacke, M. Organometallics 2007, 26, 2501–2506. (j) Gansa¨uer, A.;
Winkler, I.; Worgull, D.; Lauterbach, T.; Franke, D.; Selig, A.; Wagner,
L.; Prokop, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4160–4163.
(3) (a) Klawonn, T.; Gansa¨uer, A.; Winkler, I.; Lauterbach, T.; Franke,
D.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Feiters, M. C.; Bo¨rner, H.; Hentschel, J.; Do¨tz, K. H.
Chem. Commun. 2007, 1894–1895.
(4) (a) RajanBabu, T. V.; Nugent, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
986–997. (b) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H.; Pierobon, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 12849–12859. (c) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H. Chem. ReV. 2000,
100, 2771–2788. (d) Gansa¨uer, A.; Narayan, S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002,
344, 465–475. (e) Gansa¨uer, A.; Lauterbach, T.; Narayan, S. Angew. Chem.
2003, 115, 5714-5431; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5556-5573.
10.1021/om800700c CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 09/30/2008