SCHEME 3. Conversion of 20 into Tricycle 23
in competition with the oxidative addition of hydrogen to form
an Ir(III) dihydride 34 required for alkenyl reduction.
Where n ) 1 results indicate that the formation of 30 is
favored and that this then undergoes conversion into 31, which
in turn may then undergo decomplexation to afford the
isomerized alkene products (11, 15, 18), or evidently cyclization
and hydrogen transfer to generate the tricycles 12, 23, and 27.
In the case of n ) 0, presumably due to the extra strain
associated with the [3.3.0] bicyclic system, 32 may also be
formed, which leads to the formation of 22 on tautomerization.
This sequence of events implies a relatively slow oxidative
addition of hydrogen to Ir(I) forming the Ir(III) dihydride species
34 required for hydrogenation of the alkene.
An alternative pathway involving the addition of Ir(III)
dihydride across the double bond followed by ꢀ-hydride
elimination was also considered. However, in this instance it
would appear surprising that intermediates such as 35 would
not rapidly generate the products of direct hydrogenation on
reductive elimination.
SCHEME 4. Conversion of 26 into Tricycle 27
In summary, we have uncovered and studied an unusual
isomerization-cyclization sequence that appears to be mediated
by an iridium species derived from Crabtree’s catalyst. The key
to observing this sequence is that formal addition of two
hydrogen atoms across the trisubstituted, bicyclic alkenes used
in this study appears to be slow under the conditions studied.
Future work involves ascertaining the role, if any, played by
the heteroatom in the isomerization process and further applica-
tion of these novel N,O- and O,O-acetals in the kind of ring-
opening chemistry exemplified by the stereoselective transfor-
mation 12 to 13. In relation to these future studies an
enantioselective PKR-based method for the formation of this
type of structure has recently been reported.17
the tricycle 23, albeit in low yield (7%). None of the N-sulfonyl
enamine, which, based on the study summarized in Scheme 2,
presumably facilitates the formation of 23, was detected in this
example. The relative stereochemistry between the ring junction
in compounds 21 and 22 was elucidated by oxidation of the
alcohol 21, which formed 22, and hydrogenation (Pd/C, H2, not
shown) of 20 and the PKR adduct, which formed 21 and 22,
respectively.
Compound 23 possessed similar spectral properties to its
congener 12 and, pleasingly, underwent a similar opening of
the N,O-acetal to generate 24, again as a single major dia-
stereoisomer.
The formation of 21 and 22 in this sequence (these types of
compounds were not observed during the studies illustrated in
Scheme 2) is probably explained by the increased strain of the
[3.3.0]-bicycle and the influence this has on the reactivity of
the bridging trisubstituted alkene.
As Scheme 4 illustrates, the same sequence may be success-
fully applied to compounds possessing alternative functional
groups to the N-sulfonyl examples previously discussed. Thus,
26 (prepared following the PKR and Luche reduction of 4-but-
1-enyloxyprop-2-yne 25)16 gave 27 in moderate yield on
treatment of with 10 mol % of 1. The lower yields observed in
this sequence may reflect the increased volatility of these lower
molecular weight ether-containing compounds.
A possible mechanistic rationale, based on the sequence
presented by Guillou and co-workers,12a may be suggested
(Scheme 5). Under an atmosphere of hydrogen following
reduction and subsequent loss of COD the cationic iridium(I)
species 1 generates a 12 valence electron cationic Ir(I) species
28. Association of this cationic species to the trisubstituted
alkenes employed in this study serves to generate key complex
29 which may or may not be ligated to the hydroxyl group. It
seems reasonable that at this stage regioselective insertion into
one of two allylic carbon-hydrogen bonds serves to generate
Ir(III) π-allyl complexes 30 and 32, a step that appears to occur
Experimental Section
(1R*,3R*,7S*,8R*)-4-(Toluene-4-sulfonyl)-2-oxa-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.03,8]-
decane (12) and (4aS*,6R*)-2-(Toluene-4-sulfonyl)-3,4,4a,5,6,7-
hexahydro-2H-[2]pyrindin-6-ol (11). A solution of alcohol 10 (156
mg, 0.53 mmol, 1 equiv) in dichloromethane (20 cm3) was degassed
with a steady stream of N2 for 10 min. To this Crabtree’s catalyst
1 (20 mg, 0.025 mmol, 5 mol %) was added. Stirring was continued
under an atmosphere of H2 for 15 h. Solvent removal followed by
direct purification by flash column chromatography (cyclohexane
f cyclohexane-EtOAc; 1:1) afforded 12 as a colorless solid (78
mg, 51%) [crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography11 were formed
from gradual evaporation of a saturated solution of 12 in dichlo-
romethane]: mp 108 °C; Rf 0.65 (cyclohexane-EtOAc; 1:1); δH
(400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.35-1.40 (1H, m, 10-CH2), 1.52 (1H, d, J )
10.0 Hz, 9-CH2), 1.67-1.72 (2H, m, 6-CH2, 10-CH2), 1.87-1.89
(1H, m, 9-CH2), 1.91-1.96 (1H, m, 6-CH2), 2.22-2.28 (2H, m,
7-CH, 8-CH), 2.42 (3H, s, CH3), 2.78-2.85 (1H, m, 5-CH2),
3.45-3.49 (1H, m, 5-CH2), 4.24 (1H, s, 1-CH2), 5.77 (1H, s,
3-CH2), 7.28 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.70 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz,
ArH) ppm; δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 21.5 (CH3), 26.5 (CH2), 28.8
(CH), 34.4 (CH2), 34.8 (CH2), 38.8 (CH2), 41.2 (CH), 77.8 (CH),
85.6 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 135.9 (C), 143.2 (C) ppm;
υ
max (film) 2989, 2926, 1597, 1454, 1333, 1159, 1091, 1041, 998,
907, 867, 817, 762, 662; m/z C15H20NO3S requires 294.1164 (MH+,
100%); found 294.1178 (+4.8 ppm). Further elution gave 11 as an
amorphous solid (56 mg, 36%): Rf 0.30 (cyclohexane-EtOAc; 1:1);
δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.13-1.19 (2H, m, 4-CH2, 5-CH2),
1.96-2.01 (1H, m, 4-CH2), 2.16-2.22 (3H, m, 4-CH2, 4a-CH,
(17) (a) Hiroi, K.; Watanabe, T.; Kawagishi, R.; Abe, I. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 797. (b) Gibson, S. E.; Kaufmann, K. A. C.; Loch, J. A.;
Steed, J. W.; White, A. J. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2566.
(16) Trost, B. M.; Xie, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6044.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 21, 2008 8603