against many cancers, compound toxicity and selectivity is
an issue. The azinomycins are no exception, and significant
effort has already been made to synthesize chemical ana-
logues of these compounds.19 In this investigation, we
demonstrate timing and intermediacy of several metabolites
along the biosynthetic route to the epoxide moiety (Figure
3). We were intrigued to find that the majority if not all of
Scheme 3
the feeding results for all of the amino acid precursors. In
addition to valine 2, only substrates 3, 5, and 12 resulted in
site-specific incorporation above background at 164.0 ppm.
Interestingly, incorporation was also observed at 168.7 ppm
corresponding to the epoxyamide (Table 1), a metabolite that
frequently accompanies production of the azinomycins.1b We
were gratified to find that L-γ-hydroxyvaline 3 was unam-
biguously incorporated, substantiating its involvement in
either forming the epoxide directly (Figure 2, path B) or
generating an olefin where subsequent oxygen insertion
would give the epoxide (Figure 2, path C). As expected, only
the L-isomer 3 served as a substrate over its corresponding
D-isomer 3*, confirming the stereospecific nature of these
reactions. The site-specific incorporation of R-keto hydroxy
acid 5 was also observed and is suggestive that hydroxylation
of valine (to 3) precedes transimination. Reconstitution of
the enzymes involved in these transformations will, however,
be needed to rigorously establish this notion. The most
advanced putative precursor shown to be processed by the
azinomycin biosynthetic machinery was 3-methyl-2-ox-
obutenoic acid 12 negating direct formation of the epoxide
from the alcohol (Figure 2, path B). In contrast, isodehy-
drovaline 10 failed to incorporate, further substantiating the
order of biosynthetic steps (favoring Figure 2, path C), where
dehydration of the γ-alcohol to the double bond is suggested
to follow transimination.
Interestingly, neither of the epoxides showed incorporation
into the natural product. This is likely attributed to their
instability in aqueous medium, which increased dramatically
over time (Figure 1 of Supporting Information), with ring-
opened products and considerable lactonization occurring
over a 24 h period at room temperature (data not shown).
Notwithstanding the instability of epoxides 8 and 9, the
lifetimes of the other amino acid derivatives in aqueous
media were sufficient, under the conditions of our feeding
regimen (two separate and equal aliquots fed 24 h apart pH
7.1-7.5, 30 °C), to yield reliable incorporation data.6
The azinomycins are a structurally unique class of soil-
derived antitumor antibiotics that have shown promising
activity against carcinomas, reticulosarcoma, and terablas-
tomas in clinical trials.17 While DNA modifying agents (e.g.,
mitomycin C, calicheamin)18 are often a first line of defense
Figure 3. Biosynthetic route to the epoxide moiety in the azino-
mycins where failure to incorporate 11 suggests that 3-methyl-2-
oxobutenoic acid 12 is epoxidized to 8 which is then reduced to 9.
the enzymatic steps required to generate the epoxide fragment
occur prior to loading onto the NRPS machinery (invalidating
Figure 2, path A).
With the recent discovery of the azinomycin biosynthetic
cluster,20 it will now be possible to assign specific genes to
these and other enzymatic activities of the pathway. Such
experiments will pave the way for future genetic engineering
and/or chemoenzymatic manipulation of the biosynthetic
operon in the design of more effective anticancer agents.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Chaomin Liu (former
postdoctoral researcher in the Watanabe laboratory) for
preliminary work on the synthesis and the American Cancer
Society and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (A-1587) for
financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details
and spectral data. This material is available free of charge
OL8018852
(18) (a) Nygren, P.; Larsson, R. J. Intern. Med. 2003, 253, 46. (b)
Bernold, D. M.; Sinicrope, F. A. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 4,
808. (c) van den Bent, M. J.; Hegi, M. E.; Stupp, R. Eur. J. Cancer 2006,
42, 582. (d) Molina, J. R.; Adjei, A. A.; Jett, J. R. Chest 2006, 130, 1211.
(19) (a) Coleman, R. S.; Tierney, M. T.; Cortright, S. B.; Carper, D. J.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7726–7735. (b) Coleman, R. S.; Woodward, R. L.;
Hayes, A. M.; Crane, E. A.; Artese, A.; Ortuso, F.; Alcaro, S. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 1891–1894. (c) LePla, R. C.; Landreau, C. A. S.; Shipman, M.;
Hartley, J. A.; Jones, G. D. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2861–
2864. (d) LePla, R. C.; Landreau, C. A. S.; Shipman, M.; Jones, G. D. D.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1174–1175. (e) Casely-Hayford, M. A.; Kerr,
N. O.; Smith, E.; Gibbons, S.; Searcey, M. Med. Chem. 2005, 1, 619–627.
(f) Casely-Hayford, M. A.; Pors, K.; James, C. H.; Patterson, L. H.; Hartley,
J. A.; Searcey, M. Org. Biomol Chem. 2005, 3, 3585–3589. (g) Hodgkinson,
T. J.; Kelland, L. R.; Shipman, M.; Suzenet, F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2000, 10, 239–241.
(20) Zhao, Q.; He, Q.; Ding, W.; Tang, M.; Kang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Deng,
W.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, J.; Tang, G.; Liu, W. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 693–
705.
(17) (a) Shimada, N.; Uekusa, M.; Denda, T.; Ishii, Y.; Iizuka, T.; Sato,
Y.; Hatori, T.; Fukui, M.; Sudo, M. J. Antibiot. 1955, 8, 67–76.
4818
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008