Organic Letters
Letter
a
a
Table 1. Condition Optimization
Scheme 2. Substrate Scope with Respect to Alkyl Bromides
Conv of 10
Yield
b
b
Entry
Catalyst
CoBr2
−
Solvent
Base
(%)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
THF
Toluene
MeOH
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
LiHMDS
NaHMDS
KHMDS
LiOtBu
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
<5
0
<5
90
0
91
trace
48
74
33
73
58
trace
<5
0
Fe(OTf)2
NiBr2·diglyme
CoCl2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
CoBr2
9
10
11
12
<5
28
0
a
Reactions were conducted on a 0.2 mmol scale using 1.2 equiv of
ketimine, 1.0 equiv of alkyl bromide, 0.05 equiv CoBr2, and 1.2 equiv
of LiHMDS at 0.1 M Et2O. Isolated yields after chromatographic
purification. Reactions were conducted on an 1 mmol scale
according to general procedure B (SI).
c
LDA
DBU
13
b
a
Reaction conditions: 10 (0.05 mmol) and 11 (0.06 mmol) according
b
to general procedure A (SI). The yield of 12a was determined by 1H
NMR spectroscopy using 1,3,5- trimethylbenzene as an internal
c
standard. Reaction conditions: 10 (0.05 mmol) and 11 (0.06 mmol)
according to general procedure B (SI).
bromides containing aromatic rings (25), tetrahydropyrans
(26), rigid frameworks such as 1-bromoadamantane (27), and
chlorine atoms (24) were also suitable substrates. Notably, an
alkyl chloride group is tolerated during the synthesis of 24.
This approach could also be applicable to produce α-branched
benzyl amines in good yields under the same conditions (29
and 30). Notably, hydrolyzation of the reaction products could
yield primary amines, which could then be isolated as the N-
Information (SI)). In addition, we found this reaction could
be conducted on a 1 mmol scale, to produce the desired
product 12 in slightly diminished yield.
This reaction displayed a decent scope with respect to the C-
aliphatic imines and C-aryl imines reaction partner as well
(Scheme 3). C-Aliphatic imines containing alkyl groups (31
and 32), aromatic rings (33), silyl esters (34), and a terminal
alkenyl group (35) could participate in this reaction. Notably,
imines originated from cinnamyl aldehyde (36) or 3-(2-
furyl)acrylaldehyde (37) underwent this transformation
smoothly. C-Aryl imines containing aromatic rings with
between 2-bromo-2-methylpropane 13 and N-fluorenyl imine
14 gave the α′ position product 16 exclusively in 70% yield,
with only a trace amount of 15 formed. These results indicated
that the cobalt catalyst played a pivotal part in the
regioselectivity control of this transformation. The use of
other catalysts such as Fe(OTf)2 and NiBr2·diglyme (entries 3
and 4) furnished 12 in lower yields. The identity of the cobalt
salt was also crucial to this reaction, as the use of CoCl2
diminished the yield of 12 significantly (entry 5). The above
observations underscored the essential roles of the catalyst
CoBr2. The use of THF instead of Et2O as solvent afforded 12
in 73% yield (entry 6), but employing MeOH led to no
observable product (entry 7). Of all the bases screened, we
found that the performance of LiHMDS was the best (entries
8−13; for other results, see Table S2). Nevertheless, the exact
reason for the unique utility of LiHMDS in this reaction is
unclear at this stage. We speculate this could be due to Li+
affecting the aggregation state of the 2-azaallyl anions.14
Having identified the optimal reaction conditions, we
continued to explore the scope of this transformation (Scheme
2). We noticed a wide array of unactivated alkyl bromides
could partake in this reaction. For instance, simple primary
alkyl bromides (28) and primary alkyl bromides containing
acetals (12), silyl esters (17), and double bonds (18) were well
tolerated. Secondary noncyclic and cyclic alkyl bromides (19−
23) could also be readily employed. We were concerned that
under the basic conditions tertiary alkyl bromides would
experience rapid E2 elimination. However, tertiary alkyl
Scheme 3. Substrate Scope with Respect to the Imines
a
Reactions were conducted on a 0.2 mmol scale using 1.2 equiv of
ketimine, 1.0 equiv of alkyl bromide, 0.05 equiv CoBr2, and 1.2 equiv
of LiHMDS at 0.1 M Et2O. Isolated yields after chromatographic
purification.
3819
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3818−3822