Organic Letters
Letter
(2) (a) Nakamura, I.; Yamamoto, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344,
111. (b) Brandi, A.; Cicchi, S.; Cordero, F. M.; Goti, A. Chem. Rev.
2003, 103, 1213. (c) Rubin, M.; Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 3117. (d) Masarwa, A.; Marek, I. Chem.Eur. J. 2010, 16,
9712. (e) Yu, L.; Guo, R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2011, 43, 209. (f) Shi,
M.; Lu, J.-M.; Wei, Y.; Shao, L.-X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 641.
(3) Laurie, V. W.; Stigliani, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 1485.
(4) Ma, S.; Zhang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 183.
(5) Scott, M. E.; Bethuel, Y.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
1482.
(6) Hu, B.; Xing, S.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5481.
(7) Fujino, D.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 9682.
(8) (a) Patil, D. V.; Phun, L. H.; France, S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5684.
(b) Phun, L. H.; Patil, D. V.; Cavitt, M. A.; France, S. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 1952. (c) Patil, D. V.; Cavitt, M. A.; Grzybowski, P.; France, S.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10278. (d) Phun, L. H.; Aponte-Guzman, J.;
France, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3198.
isopropenyl π-donor, similar reactivity trends were observed for
ACPs bearing either a cyclohexyl (21a)24 or a 4-methoxyphenyl
(21b) alkylidene substituent, as phenols 22a and 22b were
formed in 66% and 49% yield, respectively (entries 1 and 2).
For 21c, bearing the phenyl group, an unsurprising 2.7:1
mixture of phenols 22c and 22c′ was observed in 59% yield
(entry 3). With dihydropyran as the π-nucleophile, phenol 24b
was obtained in 26% yield (entry 4). The conformation and
steric impact of the pyranyl ring are implicated in the decreased
reaction efficiency. To examine that premise, the ACP 25b,
containing an ethoxy vinyl subtituent, was prepared. 25b, having
less destabilizing steric and conformational influences, should
perform more effectively. Indeed, 25b smoothly afforded phenol
26b in 51% yield (entry 5).
Finally, to understand the regioselectivity of the reaction
of ACPs derived from 1,3-disubstituted allenes, we prepared
21h from 3-methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)allene 3h. Under the
standard reaction conditions, 21h afforded the expected phenol
22h in 58% yield (eq 2).
(9) For a review on recent synthetic approaches to alkylidene
cyclopropanes, see: Audran, G.; Pellissier, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010,
352, 575.
(10) For representative examples of the formation of alkylidene
cyclopropanes from Rh(II)-catalyzed cyclopropanation of allenes and
α-diazocompounds, see: (a) Cheng, C.; Shimo, T.; Domekawa, K.;
Baba, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2031. (b) Huval, C. C.; Singleton, D.
A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2020. (c) Gregg, T. M.; Farrugia, M. K.;
Frost, J. R. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4434.
1
(11) Conversions were determined by both TLC and H NMR for
In conclusion, we have disclosed a Lewis acid catalyzed, formal
homo-Nazarov-type cyclization of alkylidene-1,1-ketoesters to
form functionalized arenes and heteroarenes in up to 98% yield.
Of the two possible regioisomeric outcomes, the major product
arises from intramolecular π-attack on the most energetically
favorable allylic cationic intermediate, unless steric constraints
prevent such an attack. The choice of the alkylidene substituent
also affects reaction outcomes. The reaction is amenable to
alkenyl, aryl, and heteroaryl intramolecular π-nucleophiles.
Application of the methodology in both natural product and
materials synthesis is underway, and the results will be reported
in due course.
the consumption of ACP 5a. See Supporting Information.
(12) Changing the solvent (i.e., CH3CN, 1,2-DCE, toluene) afforded
reduced yields or poor conversion. See Supporting Information.
(13) We also examined Al(OTf)3 as the catalyst (higher selectivity),
but it proved to be less effective for the substrate scope studies.
(14) Hanna, S. Y.; Khalil, S. M.; Shandala, M. Y. Z. Naturforsch., A
2004, 59, 971.
(15) Wang reported the formation of an alkylidene-2,3-dihydrofuran
that is similar to intermediate 8 from a benzylidene cyclopropane 1,1-
ketoester (see ref 6). For representative examples of the formation of
2,3-dihydrofurans from donor−acceptor cyclopropanes, see:
(a) Yadav, V. K.; Balamurugan, R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2717.
(b) Bowman, R. K.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 573.
(c) Schneider, T. F.; Kaschel, J.; Dittrich, B.; Werz, D. B. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2317.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
(16) Schotes, C.; Mezzetti, A. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 528.
(17) Duttwyler, S.; Zhang, Y.; Linden, A.; Reed, C. A.; Baldridge, K.
K.; Siegel, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3787.
Experimental procedures, spectral and analytical data for all
new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the
(18) For representative examples of Hiyama coupling reactions:
(a) Hiyama, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653, 58. (b) Hachiya, H.;
Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2202.
(19) For the seminal contribution by Fleming (Fleming oxidation),
see: Fleming, I.; Sanderson, P. E. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4229.
(20) For examples of heteroaryl π-nucleophiles in the formal homo-
Nazarov reaction, see: (a) Greiner-Bechert, L.; Sprang, T.; Otto, H.-H.
Monatsh. Chem. 2005, 136, 635. (b) Yadav, V. K.; Kumar, N. V. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 3774. (c) De Simone, F.; Andres, J.; Torosantucci, R.;
Waser, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1023.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(21) For formal homo-Nazarov literature using an aryl group as π-
nucleophiles: (a) Murphy, W. S.; Wattanasin, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1982, 271. (b) Yoshida, E.; Nishida, K.; Toriyabe, K.;
Taguchi, R.; Motoyoshiya, J.; Nishii, Y. Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 194.
(22) (a) Wheland, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 900.
(b) Dowdy, D.; Gore, P. H.; Waters, D. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 1991, 1149.
(23) For the seminal example of a formal homo-Nazarov cyclizations
using alkenyl π-nucleophiles, see: Tsuge, O.; Kanemasa, S.; Otsuka, T.;
Suzuki, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61, 2897.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
S.F. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the
National Science Foundation (CAREER Award CHE-
1056687) and Georgia Tech for a Blanchard Assistant Professor
Fellowship. J.A.-G. thanks the National Science Foundation for
a graduate research fellowship (DGE-1148903) and Georgia
Tech for a Presidential Fellowship. E.T. acknowledges Georgia
Tech and the National Science Foundation for a summer REU
(NSF REU 1156657).
(24) We observed that there is no measurable effect on reaction
efficiencies (i.e., yield, conversion, reaction time) by switching between
methyl or ethyl esters.
REFERENCES
(1) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 8341.
■
3791
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol501676q | Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3788−3791