of this important molecule, as far as we are aware, there has
been no successful, direct, asymmetric self-aldol reaction.
Wong and co-workers obtained a cyclized trimer overreaction
product of the aldol product via a double-aldol reaction when
acetaldehyde was treated with 2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate
aldolase.6 Barbas and co-workers reported that (S,E)-5-
hydroxy-2-hexenal, which was generated by the double-aldol
reaction followed by a dehydration reaction, was obtained
in a low yield with good enantioselectivity in the reaction
of acetaldehyde catalyzed by proline.7 Thus, it is difficult to
obtain the self-aldol product because of these overreactions
of the generated aldol product. Moreover, control of the
enantioselectivity is also difficult. Arylaldehydes were
employed as electrophiles in our previous cross-aldol reaction
of acetaldehyde, in which the discrimination of a large aryl
group and a small H atom was realized to generate excellent
enantioselectivity. When acetaldehyde is used as an elec-
trophile, both methyl group and H atom must be discrimi-
nated, and their sizes are similar, making this enantioselective
reaction very difficult. In this paper, we describe the first
successful realization of the direct, asymmetric self-aldol
reaction of acetaldehyde.
Table 1. Effects of Catalyst and Solvent in the Self-Aldol
Reaction of Acetaldehydea
entry
catalyst
solvent
time/day
yield (%)
eeb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
proline
neat
neat
1
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
<5c,d
61c
nd
64
65
60
65
51
76
82
70
nd
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
hexane
CH3CN
THF
CH2Cl2
DMF
NMP
NMP
NMP
68c
63c
59c
58c
55e
56e
46e
10
<5e,f
a The reaction was performed using acetaldehyde (3 mmol), catalyst
(0.2 mmol), and solvent (0.3 mL) at 4 °C for the indicated period of time,
and MeOH and NaBH4 were added to the reaction mixture at same
temperature. nd ) not determined. b The enantiomeric excess was deter-
mined by chiral HPLC analyses of bis-benzoate product. c Yield of the
isolated product 5 after column chromatography. d Crotonaldehyde was
formed in 85% yield. e Yield of the bis-benzoate (three steps) after the
treatment of diol 5 with benzoyl chloride and Et3N. f Crotonaldehyde was
formed in 20% yield.
proceeded in most solvents, such as hexane, CH3CN, THF,
CH2Cl2, DMF, and NMP, and the yields were similar, as
summarized in Table 1. However, the enantioselectivity was
different. The best results were obtained when NMP was
employed to afford the bis-benzoate in a 56% yield with
good enantioselectivity (82% ee, entry 8).
Figure 1. Organocatalysts examined in this study.
Next, different catalysts were investigated. When diphenyl-
prolinol 2 was employed, the reaction proceeded to afford the
product in a 46% yield with lower enantioselectivity (70% ee,
entry 9). The hydroxy group is essential, and the product was
obtained in less than a 5% yield with the formation of
crotonaldehyde in a 20% yield when diarylprolinol silyl ether
38 was employed, which is an effective catalyst in the Mannich
and Michael reactions of acetaldehyde (entry 10).4b,c
First, the self-aldol reaction of acetaldehyde was examined
using proline as a catalyst. Although the aldol reaction
proceeded, the successive dehydration reaction was fast,
generating crotonaldehyde as the major product in an 85%
yield (Table 1, entry 1). Trifluoromethyl-substituted diaryl-
prolinol, which gave an excellent result in the cross-aldol
reaction of acetaldehyde,4a was employed as a catalyst. The
aldol reaction was found to proceed, and the crude NMR of
the reaction mixture suggested that acetal 4 was the main
product (Table 1, eq 1); it was generated by the reaction of
the generated aldol product 8 with another acetaldehyde
molecule (Scheme 2). Acetal 4 is regarded as a synthetic
equivalent of the self-aldol product 8. We were able to isolate
acetal 4, and as acetal 4 is labile to acid, it was found to
decompose on silica gel. The aldol product 8 was isolated
as the corresponding diol 5 in a 61% yield after reduction
of the aldol product 8 after treatment with NaBH4 in MeOH.
The enantiomeric excess was determined to be 64% from
the chiral HPLC analysis of the bis-benzoate product (Table
1, entry 2). The reaction conditions were examined in detail
in order to increase the enantioselectivity. The reaction
(8) Diarylprolinol silyl ether was developed by our group and Jørgensen’s
group, independently. For our contribution of diphenylrpolinol silyl ether,
see: (a) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 4212. (b) Gotoh, H.; Masui, R.; Ogino, H.; Shoji, M.; Hayashi,
Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6853. (c) Hayashi, Y.; Okano, T.;
Aratake, S.; Hazelard, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4922. (d) Gotoh,
H.; Hayashi, Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2859. (e) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Masui,
R.; Ishikawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4012. (f) Hayashi, Y.;
Samanta, S.; Gotoh, H.; Ishikawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
6634. For the contribution of Jørgensen’s group, see: (g) Marigo, M.;
Wabnitz, T. C.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 794. (h) Marigo, M.; Fielenbach, D.; Braunton, A.; Kjasgaard,
A.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3703. For a recent
report of Jørgensen’s group, see: (i) Franke, P. T.; Johansen, R. L.; Bertelsen,
S.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Asian. J. 2008, 3, 216. For selected examples
of other groups’ application of diarylprolinol ether, see: (j) Enders, D.; Huttl,
M. R. M.; Grondal, C.; Raabe, G. Nature 2006, 441, 861. (k) Vesely, J.;
Ibrahem, I.; Zhao, G.-L.; Rios, R.; Cordova, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 778. (l) Xie, H.; Zu, L.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 10886. (m) Vo, N. T.; Pace, R. D. M.; O’Hara, F.; Gaunt,
M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 404. For a review, see: (n) Palomo, C.;
Mielgo, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7876. (o) Mielgo, A.; Palomo,
C. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 922.
(6) Gijsen, H. J. M.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8422.
(7) Cordova, A.; Notz, W., III J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 301.
5582
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 24, 2008