Communications
acid with LAH provided alcohol 14 in 86% yield (over 2
steps).
Advancement of alcohol 14 to 2 involved the cross-
metathesis of butene-1,4-diol derivative 16 catalyzed by the
second-generation Grubbs catalyst 15 to give 18 in 95% yield
(Scheme 4). Oxidation with Dess–Martin periodinane fol-
lowed by olefination with (iodomethylene)triphenylphos-
phorane under the conditions developed by Stork and
Zhao[10] provided vinyl iodide 19 in 82% yield. Conversion
of 19 into the stannane by treatment with tBuLi in the
presence of tributyltin chloride also resulted in removal of the
pivalate group to give alcohol 20 in 85% yield. Treatment of
this alcohol with Dess–Martin periodinane and a subsequent
Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction yielded stannyl diox-
enone 2 in 60% yield (over 2 steps).
The synthesis of the b-hydroxyornithine subunit 3 began
with the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation of a,b-unsa-
turated ester 21 to give diol 22 in 90% yield and > 98% ee
(Scheme 5). Introduction of the nitrogen functionality was
achieved by formation of the cyclic sulfite and ring-opening
with sodium azide. Subsequent silylation provided ether 23 in
80% yield (over 3 steps). Reduction of the azide and
nosylation[11] led to 24 in 94% yield, and subsequent
introduction of the methyl group by the Mitsunobu reaction
Scheme 4. Completion of the carbocyclic domain 2. Reagents and
conditions: a) 16, 10 mol% 15, CH2Cl2, 95%; b) 1. Dess–Martin per-
iodinane, CH2Cl2; 2. [Ph3P+CH2I]IÀ, NaHMDS, THF, 82% (over 2
steps); c) tBuLi, Bu3SnCl (internal quench), THF, 85%; d) 1. Dess–
Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2; 2. 17, KHMDS, THF, 60% (over 2 steps).
Piv=pivalate.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the b-hydroxyornithine subunit 3. Reagents and
conditions: a) AD-mix-a, 90%; b) 1. SOCl2, Et3N; 2. NaN3, DMF, 558C;
3. TBSOTf, 2-6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 80% (over 3 steps); c) 1. Pd/C, H2,
EtOAc; 2. NsCl, iPr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 94% (over 2 steps); d) MeOH, Ph3P,
DEAD, THF; e) PhSH, K2CO3, DMF, 82% (over 2 steps). DEAD=
diethyl azodicarboxylate, DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, Ns=o-nitro-
phenylsulfonyl.
gave 25; then removal of the nosyl group with thiophenoxide
provided amine 3 (82% from 24).
After exploring a number of unsuccessful end-game
strategies that paralleled those employed for the preparation
of the natural product cylindramide, we completed the
synthesis as shown in Scheme 6.[12] Coupling of the two
halves of the molecule was achieved by heating dioxenone 2
with amine 3 in toluene under reflux for 6 hours. The sensitive
b-ketoamide product was subjected to Stille coupling with
tert-butyl-b-iodoacrylate, and subsequent Lacey–Dieckmann
cyclization led to tetramic acid 26 in 50% yield (over 3 steps
from 2). Macrolactamization was achieved by simultaneous
removal of the Boc and tert-butyl ester groups with TFA, and
treatment of the resulting compound with DEPC and Et3N in
DMF for 12 hours.[13] Removal of the TBS group with HF
Scheme 3. Elaboration of the bicyclo[3.3.0]octene. Reagents and con-
ditions: a) 10% Pd/C (10 wt%), EtOAc, H2, 94%; b) 1. LDA,
NCCO2Me, THF/DMPU; then NaBH4, MeOH, 74% (over 2 steps);
2. MsCl, DMAP, Et3N, CH2Cl2; then NaH, MeOH/THF (5:1), 87%
(over 2 steps); c) allyltrimethylsilane, TBAF, DMF/DMPU, 78%,
d.r. 4:1; d) LDA, TMSCl, THF; then HCl (1n), d.r. 2:1; e) I2, MeCN, RT,
58% (over 2 steps); f) 1. Zn, AcOH, THF/H2O; 2. LAH, THF, 86%
(over 2 steps). DMAP=4-dimethylaminopyridine, DMPU=1,3-
dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone, LAH=lithium alumi-
num hydride, LDA=lithium diisopropylamide, Ms=methanesulfonyl,
TBAF=tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride.
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8499 –8501