2880
S. Born et al.
LETTER
OMe
Elliott, R.; Colombero, A.; Elliott, G.; Scully, S.; Hsu, H.;
Sullivan, J.; Hawkins, N.; Davy, E.; Capparelli, C.; Eli, A.;
Qian, Y. X.; Kaufman, S.; Sarosi, I.; Shalhoub, V.; Senaldi,
G.; Guo, J.; Delaney, J.; Boyle, W. J. Cell 1998, 93, 165.
(c) Hsu, H.; Lacey, D. L.; Dunstan, C. R.; Solovyev, I.;
Colombero, A.; Timms, E.; Tan, H.-L.; Elliott, G.; Kelley,
M. J.; Sarosi, I.; Wang, L.; Xia, X.-Z.; Elliott, R.; Chiu, L.;
Black, T.; Scully, S.; Capparelli, C.; Morony, S.;
Shimamoto, G.; Bass, M. B.; Boyle, W. J. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96, 3540.
OMe
BrMg
THF
OH
CHO
66%
OMe
OMe
13
7
EtOAc
IBX
reflux, 81%
H
(4) (a) Kita, M.; Uemura, D. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 454.
(b) Kita, M.; Ohishi, N.; Washida, K.; Kondo, M.; Koyama,
T.; Yamada, K.; Uemura, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13,
5253.
OMe
C
H
H
Ar
H9
O
H4
H9
C
(5) Reported total syntheses of symbioimine, see: (a) Varseev,
G. N.; Maier, M. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4767.
(b) Zou, Y.; Che, Q.; Snider, B. B. Org. Lett. 2006, 24,
5605. (c) Kim, J.; Thomson, R. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 3104. For other synthetic studies, see: (d) Snider,
B. B.; Che, Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 932.
(e) Sakai, E.; Araki, K.; Takamura, H.; Uemura, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6343. For our own efforts along
with 2,3-dihydropyridine strategy, see: (f) Born, S.;
Kobayashi, Y. Synlett 2008, 2479.
(6) (a) Gras, J.-L.; Bertrand, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 4549.
(b) Gras, J.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3738. (c) Taber,
D. F.; Kong, S.; Malcolm, S. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
7953. (d) Coe, J. W.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
915. (e) Frankowski, K. J.; Golden, J. E.; Zeng, Y.; Lei, Y.;
Aubé, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6018.
(7) Sammakia showed an interesting method to prepare an
octalone core structure of dihydrocompactin, see:
Sammakia, T.; Johns, D. M.; Kim, G.; Berliner, M. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6504.
(8) Preparation of (E)-6-iodohex-5-en-1-ol: (a) Lipshutz, B. H.;
Kell, R.; Ellsworth, E. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7257.
(b) Nishida, A.; Shirato, F.; Nakagawa, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3789.
(9) Synthesis of pinacolboronate: Shirakawa, K.; Arase, A.;
Hoshi, M. Synthesis 2004, 1814.
(10) (a) More, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001.
(b) Frigerio, M.; Santagostino, M.; Sputore, S. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 4537.
(11) Preparation of b-ketophosphonate: Hosokawa, S.; Seki, M.;
Fukuda, H.; Tatsuta, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2439.
(12) Attempted Diels–Alder reaction of 11 under conventional
conditions: (a) xylene, reflux, 2 d, and (b) MeAlCl2,
CH2Cl2, –78 °C.
H4
OMe
H
2.70 ppm
(ddd, J = 13.2, 5.2, 3.2 Hz)
14
Scheme 7 Intramolecular Diels–Alder reaction of vinyl ketone
As Uemura suggested in his proposed biosynthesis of
symbioimine, the intramolecular Diels–Alder reaction of
the trans-enone linear precursor is possible. In our hands,
the reaction proceeded very cleanly under microwave-
heating conditions (MeOH, 160 °C, 4 h), although the
endo/exo selectivity was moderate (3:1). The stereochem-
istry of each adduct was unambiguously determined by
NMR analysis. We anticipated the steric interaction in the
transition state of the Diels–Alder reaction to be signifi-
cant between the substituents at the termini of the diene
and the dienophile and make the reaction rate slow. There-
fore, most likely, the exo-selective Diels–Alder reaction is
catalyzed by an enzyme if it is the biosynthetic route. In-
stallation of a protected amino group in trans-enone 11
might increase the steric hindrance and influence the reac-
tion rate and the endo/exo selectivity. The results will be
reported in due course.
Acknowledgment
We greatly acknowledge the University of California for financial
support, and UCSD undergraduate students, Oren Berger, Janice
Sindac, Karina Chan, Kathy Yue, Wei-Hao Zheng, Brian Nguyen,
and Jin Kim for preliminary studies. We also thank Dr. Yongxuan
Su (UCSD) for Mass Spectroscopy, Dr. Anthony Mrse (UCSD) for
help with NOESY experiments, and Professor Tadeusz Molinski
(UCSD) for a microwave instrument.
(13) Microwave instrument: CEM Discovery Labmate
microwave system.
(14) Microwave-assisted heating of 11 in ethanol provided the
Diels–Alder adducts 12a and 12b in 69% with exo/endo =
1:2.
(15) The minor diastereomer was assumed to be the exo-adduct.
We do not exclude the possibility of epimerization of the
major kinetic endo-adduct 14 to the minor exo-adduct under
the reaction conditions.
References and Notes
(1) Kita, M.; Kondo, M.; Koyama, T.; Yamada, K.; Matsumoto,
T.; Lee, K. H.; Woo, J. T.; Uemura, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 4794.
(2) Rowan, R.; Powers, D. A. Science 1991, 251, 1348.
(3) RANKL induces osteoclast-like multinucleated cell
formation in cultures of bone marrow cells. See:
(16) As expected, the bulky dienophile below did not afford any
Diels–Alder adduct even under the microwave-assisted
heating conditions. The starting material was recovered
quantitatively (Scheme 8).
(17) 1H NMR and 13C NMR Data for Compounds 11, 12a,b,
and 14
(a) Yasuda, H.; Shima, N.; Nakagawa, N.; Yamaguchi, K.;
Kiosaki, M.; Mochizuki, S.-i.; Tomoyasu, A.; Yano, K.;
Goto, M.; Murakami, A.; Tsuda, E.; Morinaga, T.; Higashio,
K.; Udagawa, N.; Takahashi, N.; Suda, T. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 3597. (b) Lancey, D. L.; Timms, E.;
Tan, H. L.; Kelley, M. J.; Dunstan, C. R.; Burgess, T.;
Compound 11: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 6.78 (q,
J = 11.2, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.70 (dd, J = 11.2, 16.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.51
(d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.35 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.32 (t,
J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.18 (dd, J = 15.6, 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.02 (dd,
Synlett 2008, No. 18, 2877–2881 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York