inositol compounds using chiral auxiliaries,19 intramolecular
olefin metathesis of the 1,7-octadiene derivatives followed
by dihydroxylation,20 and desymmetrization of myo-inositol
employing peptide-based catalysts.21 We recently found that
sugars were useful chiral agents for desymmetrization in
natural product synthesis.16k,22 Conceptually, two D-mannosyl
units could be simultaneously installed at the 2-O and 6-O
positions of the meso myo-inositol-derived 2,4,6-triol. This
desymmetrized approach would straightforwardly afford the
chiral pseudotrisaccharide core. Scheme 1 illustrates our
retrosynthetic design for the triacylated PIM2 1. The target
molecule 1 could be obtained by coupling of the H-
phosphonate 2 with the 1-alcohol 3 followed by global
deprotection of all benzyl groups. Due to the steric effect
created by the bulkiness of two adjacent 2-O- and 6-O-linked
D-mannosyl rings, the environment of the 1-C-hydroxyl
group in the myo-inositol ring of 1,3-diol 4 is more hindered
than the hydroxyl at the 3-C position. The stearyl group could
be regioselectively introduced at the 3-C-hydroxyl of 4 to
get the 1-alcohol 3. In addition, the 2-O-attached mannosyl
ring and the 3-C-hydroxyl orient toward the same ꢀ-face and
the 4-C- and 5-C-hydroxyls are more reactive because of
the steric effect. Regioselective 4,5-di-O-benzylation of
1,3,4,5-tetraol 5 would yield the desired diol 4. The prepara-
tion of tetraol 5 could be carried out via hydrolysis of the
orthoformate group in the 4-alcohol 6 under mild acidic
conditions. Regioselective and stereoselective coupling of
the D-mannosyl trichloroacetimidate 723 with commercially
available myo-inositol 1,3,5-orthoformate 8 would furnish
the pseudotrisaccharide 6 in a one-pot manner. Theoretically,
the first D-mannosyl unit could be assembled at the 2-C-
equatorial hydroxyl followed by desymmetric installation of
the second D-mannosyl ring at the 6-C-axial hydroxyl.
Although the strategy for direct glycosidation of 2,4,6-
triol 8 is promising,24 its low solubility in most common
organic solvents, e.g., dichloromethane, ethyl ether, aceto-
nitrile, toluene, and nitromethane, is a big concern. Com-
Scheme 2. Desymmetrization of the Meso Triol 8
pound 8 is slightly soluble in THF and completely dissolves
in 1,4-dioxane. Since the melting point of dioxane is 11 °C
and the temperature for most sugar coupling reactions is
below -20 °C, a mixed solvent of dioxane with dichlo-
romethane or tetrahydrofuran was selected for further
investigation. As outlined in Scheme 2, BF3·OEt2-activated
coupling of 8 with 1.2 equiv of the D-mannosyl donor 7 in
a 1:1 ratio of 1,4-dioxane and dichloromethane at -40 °C
for 1 h gave the 2-O-mannosylated 4,6-diol 9, the 2,6-di-
O-mannosylated 4-alcohol 6, and its diastereoisomer 10 in
67%, 5%, and 3% isolated yields, respectively. This fact has
revealed that the 2-C-equatorial hydroxy group of 8 is more
reactive than the others at 4-C and 6-C. When 2 equiv of
the donor 7 was used in the reaction, the yield of 6 slightly
increased, but the mono-D-mannosylated compound 9 was
acquired as the major adduct. To realize the lower reactivity
of the axial hydroxyls, excess donor and higher reaction
temperature were employed to improve the results. The
optimized 64% yield of 6, having identical spectral data with
a previous report,16k was obtained by treatment of 8 with 8
equiv of the donor 7 in the presence of BF3·OEt2 as the
promoter at -40 °C and then warming to -20 °C. Under
these conditions, 9 and 10 were isolated in 5% and 19%
yields, respectively. Different promoters (AgOTf and TM-
SOTf), D-mannosyl donors (thioglycoside, glycosyl phos-
phate, and glycosyl chloride), and mixed solvent combina-
tions (1,4-dioxane/tetrahydrofuran and pure tetrahydrofuran)
were also examined, but the yields of the expected 2,6-di-
O-mannosylated product 6 were not satisfactory. With the
4-alcohol 6 in hand, removal of the 1,3,5-orthoformate group
was further investigated. p-Toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA)-
catalyzed methanolysis of 6 was carried out at room
temperature, and the corresponding 1,3,4,5-tetraol 5 was
afforded in excellent yield (99%).
(17) (a) Potter, B. V. L.; Lampe, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34,
1933–1972. (b) Conway, S. J.; Miller, G. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 687–
707.
(18) Estevez, V. A.; Prestwich, G. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
9885–9887.
(19) (a) Murakata, C.; Ogawa, T. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 235, 95–114.
(b) Bruzik, K. S.; Tsai, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6361–6374.
(c) Painter, G. F.; Grove, S. J. A.; Gilbert, I. H.; Holmes, A. B.; Raithby,
P. R.; Hill, M. L.; Hawkins, P. T.; Stephens, L. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 923–935. (d) Stadelmaier, A.; Schmidt, R. R. Carbohydr.
Res. 2003, 338, 2557–2569. (e) Conway, S. J.; Gardiner, J.; Grove, S. J. A.;
Johns, M. K.; Lim, Z. Y.; Painter, G. F.; Robinson, D.; Schieber, C.;
Thuring, J. W.; Wong, L. S. M.; Yin, M. X.; Burgess, A. W.; Catimel, B.;
Hawkins, P. T.; Ktistakis, N. T.; Stephens, L. R.; Holmes, A. B. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 66–76.
(20) Conrad, R. M.; Grogan, M. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
1359–1361.
(21) (a) Wang, Y. L. K.; Chen, W.; Blair, D.; Pu, M. M.; Xu, Y. J.;
Miller, S. J.; Redfield, A. G.; Chiles, T. C.; Roberts, M. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 7746–7755. (b) Sculimbrene, B. R.; Xu, Y. J.; Miller, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13182–13183. (c) Morgan, A. J.; Wang, Y. K.;
Roberts, M. F.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15370–15371.
(d) Sculimbrene, B. R.; Morgan, A. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 11653–11656. (e) Sculimbrene, B. R.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10125–10126.
(22) Luo, S. -Y.; Jang, Y.-J.; Liu, J.-Y.; Chu, C.-S.; Liao, C.-C.; Hung,
S.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8082–8085
(23) Zhu, X.; Schimidt, R. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1900–
1934.
.
(24) (a) Uhlmann, P.; Vasella, A. HelV. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 1979–
1994. (b) Uriel, C.; Go´mez, A. M.; Lo´pez, J. C.; Fraser-Reid, B. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 403–411.
2620
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010