Bartoccini et al.
JOCNote
have been reported in a few cross-coupling reactions.14 Gratify-
ingly, when commercially available tri-n-butylborane with 2 mol
% Pd(dppf)Cl2, Cs2CO3 (2 equiv), and chloropurine 1 was used,
satisfactory conversion and yield of the desired product 2a was
obtained (entry 11). Optimization of the reaction conditions in
terms of catalyst loading, base, and solvent (data not shown)
achieved complete conversion and very good yield (entry 12).
Variation of the organoborane was also carried out, using
tri-n-ethylborane, which gave the desired product 2b in com-
parable yield (entry 13). Thus, this procedure can replace the
Stille coupling in the synthesis of ST1535 that can be obtained
by using the sequence already reported.5a The existing synthe-
sis of ST1535 presents some limitations other than the C-C
bond formation, however, such as the use of very expensive
2,6-dichloropurine as the starting material, the need to first
introduce the protected amino group in the more reactive C6
position, and, consequently, the problematic final deprotection
with triflic acid.
To further improve the overall efficiency of the synthesis of
ST1535 and explore the scope and limitations of this B-alkyl
Suzuki coupling with trialkylborane, the more challenging and
readily available substrate 6-chloro-2-iodo-9-methylpurine
was chosen, since regioselectivity in the alkylation step had to
be taken into account.15 According to the literature,16 the C2
position should be the most reactive position in palladium-
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, whereas the C6 position
should be the most reactive position in nucleophilic substitu-
tion reactions. Thus, the C-C coupling must be carried out
first, which opens the possibility of further derivatization of
such compounds at the 6-position to give biologically relevant
compounds. As expected by using the optimal conditions
reported above, the reaction proceeded with high regioselec-
tivity and afforded 2-butyl-6-chloro-9-methylpurine in good
yield (Table 2, entry 1). Only trace amounts of bis-alkylated
product (<3%) were found. Decreasing the catalyst loading or
the amount of organoborane led to lower conversion and poor
yields (entries 2 and 3). As expected, variation of the nucleo-
phile with tri-n-ethylborane gave coupling product 4b in
excellent yield (entry 13). Notably, B-alkyl Suzuki coupling
also on this substrate with use of conventional butylboronic
acid and butyltrifluoroborate provided very low yields under
different conditions (entries 4-7). No highly toxic thallium
compounds (TlOH or Tl2CO3) or other additives were utilized
for the reaction. The Negishi cross-coupling with BuZnBr did
not proceed in a satisfactory manner and low conversions in
different experimental conditions were found (entries 10-12).
However, the use of highly reactive alkylzinc reagents with aryl
or heteroaryl halides has been reported.17 Thus, we cannot
exclude that further optimization of the reaction conditions
and/or in situ generation of the air- and moisture-sensitive zinc
reagents could improve the yield of the cross-coupling product.
On the contrary, the Stille coupling with a toxic stannane
FIGURE 1. General structure of A2A antagonist and ST1535.
has been used to introduce different alkyl chains.5a Despite the
fact that the Stille reaction was very useful to introduce alkyl
chains in the less reactive 2-position of the purine, it had
several drawbacks, including toxicity of the reagents and
byproduct, low turnover number (TON) and turnover fre-
quency (TOF), harsh reaction conditions, and problematic
final purification. Herein, we report on the scope and limita-
tions of the utilization of different butyl metal reagents in the
synthesis of 2-butyl-substituted purines as an alternative
synthetic methodology to the Stille reaction and its application
in the synthesis of ST1535.10 First, we tried to optimize the
catalytic system and reaction conditions of 6-dibenzylamino-
2-chloro-9-methylpurine, previously reported by us, with dif-
ferent butyl metal species. Results of the cross-coupling reac-
tions are reported in Table 1.
Although there are several reports of Negishi couplings on
2-halopurines11 and it is probably the most convenient way to
introduce alkyl groups onto N-alkylated purines, no reaction
occurred on 1 using commercially available 1 M BuZnBr in
THF under standard reaction conditions (entry 2). Butyl zinc
bromide generated from BuLi or BuMgBr and ZnBr2 with
Pd(dppf)Cl2 also did not afford the coupling reaction (entry 3).
We then turned our attention to stable and commercially
available alkyl boron derivates such as butyl boronic acid and
butyl trifluoroborates.12 Because of their unique reactivity and
benign features, both of these seemed to be promising reagents
for the direct introduction of alkyl groups to the C2 position of
purines. Unfortunately, only trace amounts of product were
found with both reagents (entries 4-9). Only in the case of tri-
fluoroborate using the best conditions reported by Molander13
was 11% of the product obtained (entry 10). The small success
of the B-alkyl Suzuki-Miyaura reactions with potassium alkyl-
trifluoroborates and alkyl boronic acids did not discourage us to
test other alkyl metal reagents based on boron. Normally,
B-alkyl-9BBNs are used but must be prepared and used in situ.
Moreover, the preparation of B-alkyl-9BBNs bearing lower
alkyl groups is inconvenient as it involves hydroboration of
volatile alkenes (in our case butene) or other tedious operations.
On the other hand, some tri-n-alkylboranes are commercially
available or conveniently prepared from Grignard reagents and
(10) For reviews on the syntheses of purines based on transition metal-
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, see: (a) Hocek, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 245–254. (b) Agrofoglio, L. A.; Gillaizeau, I.; Saito, Y. Chem. Rev.
2003, 103, 1875–1891. (c) Lakshman, M. K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653,
234–251.
(11) (a) Wang, Y.; Shakespeare, W. C.; Huang, W.-S.; Sundaramoorthi,
R.; Lentini, S.; Das, S.; Liu, S.; Banda, G.; Wen, D.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Q.; Keats,
J.; Wang, F.; Wardwell, S.; Ning, Y.; Snodgrass, J. T.; Broudy, M. I.;
Russian, K.; Dalgarno, D.; Clackson, T.; Sawyer, T. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2008, 18, 4907–4912. (b) Braendvang, M.; Gundersen, L.-L. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2007, 22, 7144–7165.
(15) (a) Norman, T. C.; Gray, N. S.; Koh, J. T.; Schultz, P. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 7430–7431. (b) Matsuda, A.; Shinozaki, M.; Yamaguchi, T.;
Homma, H.; Nomoto, R.; Miyasaka, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Abiru, T. J. Med.
Chem. 1992, 35, 241–252. (c) Legraverend, M.; Ludwig, O.; Bisagni, E.; Leclerc,
S.; Meijer, L.; Giocanti, N.; Sadri, R.; Favaudon, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999,
7, 1281–1293.
(16) Piguel, S.; Legraverend, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7026–7029.
(17) (a) Huo, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 423–425. (b) Chacko, A. M.; Qu, W.;
Kung, H. F. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4874–4881. (c) Thaler, T.; Haag, B.;
Gavryushin, A.; Schober, K.; Hartmann, E.; Gschwind, R. M.; Zipse, H.;
Mayer, P.; Knochel, P. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 125–130.
(12) Doucet, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2013–2030.
(13) (a) Molander, G. A.; Yun, C.-S.; Ribagorda, M.; Biolatto, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 5534–5539. (b) Dreher, S. D.; Lim, S.-E.; Sandrock, D. L.;
Molander, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3626–3631.
(14) (a) Chemler, S. R.; Trauner, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4544–4568. (b) Sun, H. X.; Sun, Z. H.; Wang, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1596–1599.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 15, 2010 5399